Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Alters the Expression of Fibrosis-Related Molecules in Fibroblast Derived from Human Hypertrophic Scar

Hui Song Cui, A Ram Hong, June-Bum Kim, Joo Hyang Yu, Yoon Soo Cho, So Young Joo, Cheong Hoon Seo, Hui Song Cui, A Ram Hong, June-Bum Kim, Joo Hyang Yu, Yoon Soo Cho, So Young Joo, Cheong Hoon Seo

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) considerably improves the appearance and symptoms of post-burn hypertrophic scars (HTS). However, the mechanism underlying the observed beneficial effects is not well understood. The objective of this study was to elucidate the mechanism underlying changes in cellular and molecular biology that is induced by ESWT of fibroblasts derived from scar tissue (HTSFs). We cultured primary dermal fibroblasts derived from human HTS and exposed these cells to 1000 impulses of 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mJ/mm². At 24 h and 72 h after treatment, real-time PCR and western blotting were used to detect mRNA and protein expression, respectively, and cell viability and mobility were assessed. While HTSF viability was not affected, migration was decreased by ESWT. Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) expression was reduced and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), collagen-I, fibronectin, and twist-1 were reduced significantly after ESWT. Expression of E-cadherin was increased, while that of N-cadherin was reduced. Expression of inhibitor of DNA binding 1 and 2 was increased. In conclusion, suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition might be responsible for the anti-scarring effect of ESWT, and has potential as a therapeutic target in the management of post-burn scars.

Keywords: burn hypertrophic scar; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; extracorporeal shock wave therapy; hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblast; inhibitor of DNA binding protein.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The characteristics of fibroblasts derived from scar tissue (HTSFs). Matched human normal fibroblasts (HNF) and HTSF were cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. Protein expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), COL-Ι (collagen type Ι), COL-III (collagen type III), FN (fibronectin), Vimentin, fibroblast specific protein 1 (FSP-1), Twist-1 and N-cad (N-cadherin) was significantly higher in HTSFs compared with HNF from skin dermis. The protein expression of E-cad (E-cadherin), inhibitor of DNA binding protein 1 (ID-1) and inhibitor of DNA binding protein 2 (ID-2) were lower in HTSFs when compared with HNF from skin dermis. That expression of those proteins was measured by western blotting against specific antibody. The intensity of band was normalized with that of loading control, β-actin or lamin B1, respectively; HNF, Human normal skin derived fibroblast; HTSF, human hypertrophic scar derived fibroblast. * p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding HNF.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental schematic diagrams and viability of HTSFs. The dermis was separated from human hypertrophic scar tissue by dispase, and then digested with collagenase type IV. HTSF was released, collected, suspended in medium, and continue cultured. After detachment, HTSFs were suspended in to a 17 mL conical tube. ESWT is performed with 1000 impulse/cm2 at 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mJ/mm2 of energy flux densities. Then, HTSFs were seeded on 96 well cell culture plates for viability assays, μ-dish for migration assays, and T75 culture plates for RT-PCR and western blot (0 h). After 24 h, the viability of HTSF was measured. Once removes insert of μ-dish, the HTSF begins to move, and then analyzed after migration 24 and 48 h (48 and 72 h after ESWT). Real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot were performed 24 h and 72 h after plating, respectively (A). ESWT no influence on viability of HTSFs (B). Cell viability was determined using an Cell Titer-Glo® Luminescent cell viability assay kit 24 h after ESWT. Each group was assayed in sextuplicate, and the experiments were performed at three times independently. HTSF viability was expressed as a percentage value of untreated cells. Un: untreated cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) decreases the expression of TGF-β1 and alpha smooth muscle actin (α–SMA) in HTSFs. HTSF was cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. The mRNA expression of TGF-β1 (A) and α–SMA (C) were measured 24 h and 72 h after ESWT using a Light Cycler real-time PCR system. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, and experiments were performed least three times independently. The mRNA expression was normalized as ratio = 2−∆∆Ct, and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 and † p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Protein expression of TGF-β1 (B) and α–SMA (D) were measured with western blot analysis 24 and 72 h after ESWT, respectively. The protein expression was normalized with β-actin, respectively; and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Un: Untreated cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ESWT decreases the expression of extracellular matrix protein in HTSFs. HTSF was cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. The mRNA expression of collagen-I (A) and fibronectin (B) were measured 24 and 72 h after ESWT using a Light Cycler real-time PCR system. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, and experiments were performed least three times independently. The mRNA expression was normalized as ratio = 2−∆∆Ct, and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 and † p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Protein expression of collagen-Ι (C) and fibronectin (D) were measured with western blot analysis 24 and 72 h after ESWT, respectively. The protein expression was normalized with β-actin, respectively; and data are the mean ± SE. * p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Un: Untreated cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effects of ESWT on the expression of N-cadherin and E-cadherin in HTSFs. HTSFs were cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. The ESWT decreased the mRNA expression of N-cadherin (A), and increased the mRNA expression of E-cadherin (B). The mRNA expression was measured 24 h and 72 h after ESWT using a Light Cycler real-time PCR system. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, and experiments were performed least three times independently. The mRNA expression was normalized as ratio = 2−∆∆Ct, and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 and † p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. ESWT decreased the protein expression of N-cadherin (C), and increased protein expression of E-cadherin (D). Protein expression of N-cadherin and E-cadherin were measured with western blot analysis 24 h and 72 h after ESWT, respectively. The protein expression was normalized with β-actin, respectively, and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Un: Untreated cells.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ESWT regulates the expression of ID-1, ID-2, and twist-1 in HTSFs. HTSF was cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. The Protein expression of ID-1 (A), ID-2 (B) and (C) were measured with western blot analysis 24 h and 72 h after ESWT, respectively. The protein expression was normalized with lamin B1, and data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Un: Untreated cells.
Figure 7
Figure 7
ESWT decreases migration of HTSFs. HTSFs were cultured from four patients with post burn hypertrophic scar tissue. (A) The HTSF cells seeded in a culture insert in a 35 mm µ-dish after ESWT, and then after 24 h, the culture insert was removed, made a cell-free gap, allow cells to migrate for 24 h and 48 h. The images were photographed under a light microscopy (scale bar, 500 µm). (B) Quantitative analysis of the migration assay was expressed as a percentage relative to untreated cells. The untreated cells were used as control, set to 100%. Data are the mean ± S.E. * p < 0.05 and † p < 0.01 vs. the corresponding untreated control group. Un: Untreated cells.

References

    1. Gauglitz G.G., Korting H.C., Pavicic T., Ruzicka T., Jeschke M.G. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: Pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol. Med. 2011;17:113–125. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153.
    1. Aarabi S., Longaker M.T., Gurtner G.C. Hypertrophic scar formation following burns and trauma: New approaches to treatment. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040234.
    1. Armour A., Scott P.G., Tredget E.E. Cellular and molecular pathology of HTS: Basis for treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(Suppl. 1):S6–S17. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00219.x.
    1. Wynn T.A. Fibrotic disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 paradigm. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:583–594. doi: 10.1038/nri1412.
    1. Tredget E., Shankowsky H., Pannu R., Nedelec B., Iwashina T., Ghahary A., Taerum T., Scott P. Transforming growth factor-β in thermally injured patients with hypertrophic scars: Effects of interferon α2b. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998;102:1317–1328. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00001.
    1. Schmid P., Itin P., Cherry G., Bi C., Cox D.A. Enhanced expression of transforming growth factor-β type I and type II receptors in wound granulation tissue and hypertrophic scar. Am. J. Pathol. 1998;152:485–493.
    1. Yan C., Grimm W.A., Garner W.L., Qin L., Travis T., Tan N., Han Y.P. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human skin wound healing is induced by tumor necrosis factor-α through bone morphogenic protein-2. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:2247–2258. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090048.
    1. Wang R., Ghahary A., Shen Q., Scott P.G., Roy K., Tredget E.E. Hypertrophic scar tissues and fibroblasts produce more transforming growth factor-β1 mRNA and protein than normal skin and cells. Wound Repair. Regen. 2000;8:128–137. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00128.x.
    1. Nedelec B., Shankowsky H., Scott P.G., Ghahary A., Tredget E.E. Myofibroblasts and apoptosis in human hypertrophic scars: The effect of interferon-α2b. Surgery. 2001;130:798–808. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.116453.
    1. Garner W.L., Karmiol S., Rodriguez J.L., Smith D.J., Jr., Phan S.H. Phenotypic differences in cytokine responsiveness of hypertrophic scar versus normal dermal fibroblasts. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1993;101:875–879. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12371710.
    1. Honardoust D., Ding J., Varkey M., Shankowsky H.A., Tredget E.E. Deep dermal fibroblasts refractory to migration and decorin-induced apoptosis contribute to hypertrophic scarring. J. Burn Care Res. 2012;33:668–677. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31824088e3.
    1. Notarnicola A., Moretti B. The biological effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on tendon tissue. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;2:33–37.
    1. Wang C.J. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2012;20:11. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-11.
    1. Mariotto S., Cavalieri E., Amelio E., Ciampa A.R., de Prati A.C., Marlinghaus E., Russo S., Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock waves: From lithotripsy to anti-inflammatory action by NO production. Nitric Oxide. 2005;12:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2004.12.005.
    1. Zins S.R., Amare M.F., Tadaki D.K., Elster E.A., Davis T.A. Comparative analysis of angiogenic gene expression in normal and impaired wound healing in diabetic mice: Effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Angiogenesis. 2010;13:293–304. doi: 10.1007/s10456-010-9186-9.
    1. Wang C.J., Huang H.Y., Pai C.H. Shock wave enhances neovascularization at the tendon-bone junction. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2002;41:16–22. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80005-9.
    1. Wang C.J., Yang K.D., Wang F.S., Huang C.C., Yang L.J. Shock wave induces neovascularization at the tendon-bone junction. A study in rabbits. J. Orthop. Res. 2003;21:984–989. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00104-9.
    1. Schaden W., Thiele R., Kolpl C., Pusch M., Nissan A., Attinger C.E., Maniscalco-Theberge M.E., Peoples G.E., Elster E.A., Stojadinovic A. Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: A feasibility study. J. Surg. Res. 2007;143:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.009.
    1. Fioramonti P., Cigna E., Onesti M.G., Fino P., Fallico N., Scuderi N. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the management of burn scars. Dermatol. Surg. 2012;38:778–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02355.x.
    1. Cho Y.S., Joo S.Y., Cui H., Cho S.R., Yim H., Seo C.H. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on scar pain in burn patients: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Medicine. 2016;95:e4575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004575.
    1. Joo S.Y., Cho Y.S., Seo C.H. The clinical utility of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for burn pruritus: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Burns. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.014.
    1. Je Y.J., Choi D.K., Sohn K.C., Kim H.R., Im M., Lee Y., Lee J.H., Kim C.D., Seo Y.J. Inhibitory role of Id1 on TGF-β-induced collagen expression in human dermal fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;444:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.010.
    1. Yang J., Velikoff M., Agarwal M., Disayabutr S., Wolters P.J., Kim K.K. Overexpression of inhibitor of DNA-binding 2 attenuates pulmonary fibrosis through regulation of c-Abl and Twist. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:1001–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.12.008.
    1. Barriere G., Fici P., Gallerani G., Fabbri F., Rigaud M. Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition: A double-edged sword. Clin. Transl. Med. 2015;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s40169-015-0055-4.
    1. Weber C.E., Li N.Y., Wai P.Y., Kuo P.C. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, TGF-β, and osteopontin in wound healing and tissue remodeling after injury. J. Burn. Care Res. 2012;33:311–318. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318240541e.
    1. Kalluri R., Neilson E.G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2003;112:1776–1784. doi: 10.1172/JCI200320530.
    1. Song R., Bian H.N., Lai W., Chen H.D., Zhao K.S. Normal skin and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts differentially regulate collagen and fibronectin expression as well as mitochondrial membrane potential in response to basic fibroblast growth factor. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2011;44:402–410. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2011000500004.
    1. Penn J.W., Grobbelaar A.O., Rolfe K.J. The role of the TGF-β family in wound healing, burns and scarring: A review. Int. J. Burns Trauma. 2012;2:18–28.
    1. Vetrano M., d’Alessandro F., Torrisi M.R., Ferretti A., Vulpiani M.C., Visco V. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of primary cultured human tenocytes. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011;19:2159–2168. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1534-9.
    1. Hofmann A., Ritz U., Hessmann M.H., Alini M., Rommens P.M., Rompe J.D. Extracorporeal shock wave-mediated changes in proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression of human osteoblasts. J. Trauma. 2008;65:1402–1410. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318173e7c2.
    1. Saggini R., Saggini A., Spagnoli A.M., Dodaj I., Cigna E., Maruccia M., Soda G., Bellomo R.G., Scuderi N. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: An Emerging Treatment Modality for Retracting Scars of the Hands. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2016;42:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.07.028.
    1. Arnó A., García O., Hernán I., Sancho J., Acosta A., Barret J.P. Extracorporeal shock waves, a new non-surgical method to treat severe burns. Burns. 2010;36:844–849. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.11.012.
    1. Linge C., Richardson J., Vigor C., Clayton E., Hardas B., Rolfe K. Hypertrophic scar cells fail to undergo a form of apoptosis specific to contractile collagen-the role of tissue transglutaminase. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005;125:72–82. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23771.x.
    1. Albanna M., Homes J.H., IV . Skin Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 1st ed. Academic Press; London, UK: 2016. pp. 23–32.
    1. Lee C.G., Homer R.J., Zhu Z., Lanone S., Wang X., Koteliansky V., Shipley J.M., Gotwals P., Noble P., Chen Q., et al. Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor β1. J. Exp. Med. 2001;194:809–821. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.809.
    1. Zeisberg M., Neilson E.G. Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. J. Clin. Investig. 2009;119:1429–1437. doi: 10.1172/JCI36183.
    1. Derycke L.D., Bracke M.E. N-Cadherin in the spotlight of cell–cell adhesion, differentiation, embryogenesis, invasion and signalling. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2004;48:463–476. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041793ld.
    1. Bhowmick N.A., Ghiassi M., Bakin A., Aakre M., Lundquist C.A., Engel M.E., Arteaga C.L., Moses H.L. Transforming growth factor-β1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:27–36. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.1.27.
    1. Hwang S., Zimmerman N.P., Agle K.A., Turner J.R., Kumar S.N., Dwinell M.B. E-Cadherin is critical for collective sheet migration and is regulated by the chemokine CXCL12 protein during restitution. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:22227–22240. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.367979.
    1. Benezra R., Davis R.L., Lockshon D., Turner D.L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: A negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990;6:49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-Y.
    1. Lasorella A., Benezra R., Iavarone A. The ID proteins: Master regulators of cancer stem cells and tumour aggressiveness. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:77–91. doi: 10.1038/nrc3638.
    1. Hecker L., Jagirdar R., Jin T., Thannickal V.J. Reversible differentiation of myofibroblasts by MyoD. Exp. Cell Res. 2011;317:1914–1921. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.03.016.
    1. Garamszegi N., Garamszegi S.P., Samavarchi-Tehrani P., Walford E., Schneiderbauer M.M., Wrana J.L., Scully S.P. Extracellular matrix-induced transforming growth factor-β receptor signaling dynamics. Oncogene. 2010;29:2368–2380. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.514.
    1. Cui H.S., Joo S.Y., Lee D.H., Yu J.H., Jeong J.H., Kim J.B., Seo C.H. Low temperature plasma induces angiogenic growth factor via up-regulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in human dermal fibroblasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2017;630:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.07.012.
    1. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆Ct Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner