Direct Assessment of Wall Shear Stress by Signal Intensity Gradient from Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Kap-Soo Han, Sang Hyuk Lee, Han Uk Ryu, Se-Hyoung Park, Gyung-Ho Chung, Young I Cho, Seul-Ki Jeong, Kap-Soo Han, Sang Hyuk Lee, Han Uk Ryu, Se-Hyoung Park, Gyung-Ho Chung, Young I Cho, Seul-Ki Jeong

Abstract

The aim of the study was to calculate the arterial wall signal intensity gradient (SIG) from time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) and represent arterial wall shear stress. We developed a new algorithm that uses signal intensity (SI) of a TOF-MRA to directly calculate the signal intensity gradient (SIG). The results from our phantom study showed that the TOF-MRA SIG could be used to distinguish the magnitude of blood flow rate as high (mean SIG ± SD, 2.2 ± 0.4 SI/mm for 12.5 ± 2.3 L/min) and low (0.9 ± 0.3 SI/mm for 8.5 ± 2.6 L/min) in vessels (p < 0.001). Additionally, we found that the TOF-MRA SIG values were highly correlated with various flow rates (β = 0.96, p < 0.001). Remarkably, the correlation coefficient between the WSS obtained from the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and the TOF-MRA SIG was greater than 0.8 in each section at the carotid artery (p < 0.001 for all β values). This new technique using TOF-MRA could enable the rapid calculation of the TOF-MRA SIG and thereby the WSS. Thus, the TOF-MRA SIG can provide clinicians with an accurate and efficient screening method for making rapid decisions on the risk of vascular disease for a patient in clinical practice.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calculation of TOF-MRA signal intensity gradient (SIG). (a) TOF-MRA axial source image. (b) 3-dimensional gradient vector (red arrow) of the maximum intensity change. (c) Positioning of points (A and B): point A is a reference point on the artery wall (contour line) and point B is 0.03 mm distant from point A.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visualization and TOF-MRA signal intensity gradient (SIG). (a) The reference coordinate settings on TOF-MRA axial source images and the selected (left carotid) arterial color display. (b) 3D reconstruction of arterial geometry using the arterial threshold value. (c) A gradient vector setting: from the reference point on the artery wall (contour line), the position of inner point is identified with both a specific distance (0.03 mm in the present study) and the direction having the maximum gradient of the signal intensity. For the drawing, the gradient vector is lengthened to 0.3 mm. (d) 3D mapping of the carotid arterial TOF-MRA SIG.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A phantom experiment: flow-rate dependency of TOF-MRA SIG. (a) Two tubes (80 mm length) of high flow rate (H, 12.5 ± 2.3 L/min of mean flow rate) and low flow rate (L, 8.5 ± 2.6 L/min). In the middle, a MR phantom was observed. (b) Axial view of TOF-MRA SIG in the H and L tubes. (c) 3D reconstructed tubes depicting TOF-MRA SIG: TOF-MRA SIG values were significantly higher in the H tube (mean ± SD, 2.2 ± 0.4, SI/mm) than in the L tube (0.9 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). TOF-MRA SIG values were measured at three levels at 20 mm intervals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
TOF-MRA axial source image for the right internal carotid (ICA) and external carotid artery (ECA). (a) At the arterial periphery, the signal was darker near the outer wall of ICA than near the inner wall because of the difference in intraluminal saturation. (b) Color displays of the arterial signal intensity showed a clear gradation in the color scale from the arterial center region to the periphery. (c) TOF-MRA SIG showed the regions with high or low SIG values.
Figure 5
Figure 5
3D (a) and cross-sectional (b) views of wall shear stress (WSS) from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and TOF-MRA SIG in carotid artery. A comparison (c) of TOF-MRA SIG with wall shear stress from CFD. Labels indicate the levels where CFD WSS and TOF-MRA SIG were obtained and compared. In each section, TOF-MRA SIG values were significantly correlated with CFD WSS (all β > 0.8, p < 0.001).

References

    1. MacMahon S., Peto R., Cutler J., et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease—part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. The Lancet. 1990;335(8692):765–774. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90878-9.
    1. Malek A. M., Alper S. L., Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282(21):2035–2042. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.21.2035.
    1. Nesbitt W. S., Westein E., Tovar-Lopez F. J., et al. A shear gradient-dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nature Medicine. 2009;15(6):665–673. doi: 10.1038/nm.1955.
    1. Gnasso A., Carallo C., Irace C., et al. Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects. Circulation. 1996;94(12):3257–3262. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.12.3257.
    1. Steinman D. A. Image-based computational fluid dynamics modeling in realistic arterial geometries. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2002;30(4):483–497. doi: 10.1114/1.1467679.
    1. Khler U., Marshall I., Robertson M. B., Long Q., Xu X. Y., Hoskins P. R. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2001;14(5):563–573. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1220.
    1. Thomas J. B., Milner J. S., Rutt B. K., Steinman D. A. Reproducibility of image-based computational fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2003;31(2):132–141. doi: 10.1114/1.1540102.
    1. Markl M., Wegent F., Zech T., et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery effect of bifurcation eometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(6):647–655. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.958504.
    1. Boussel L., Rayz V., Martin A., et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: Comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009;61(2):409–417. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21861.
    1. Jeong S., Lee S., Park S., Han K., Chung G. Direct assessment of wall shear stress by signal intensity gradient from time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2015;357, article e63 doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.237.
    1. Haacke E. M., Masaryk T. J., Wielopolski P. A., et al. Optimizing blood vessel contrast in fast three‐dimensional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1990;14(2):202–221. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910140207.
    1. Jeong S.-K., Rosenson R. S. Shear rate specific blood viscosity and shear stress of carotid artery duplex ultrasonography in patients with lacunar infarction. BMC Neurology. 2013;13, article 36 doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-36.
    1. Lee S. H., Kang S., Hur N., Jeong S.-K. A fluid-structure interaction analysis on hemodynamics in carotid artery based on patient-specific clinical data. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2012;26(12):3821–3831. doi: 10.1007/s12206-012-1008-0.
    1. Axel L., Ann Shimakawa B. S. E. E., MacFall J. A time-of-flight method of measuring flow velocity by magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1986;4(3):199–205. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(86)91059-3.
    1. Matsuda T., Shimizu K., Sakurai T., et al. Measurement of aortic blood flow with MR imaging: comparative study with Doppler US. Radiology. 1987;162(3):857–861. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.3.3544040.
    1. Edelman R. R., Mattle H. P., Kleefield J., Silver M. S. Quantification of blood flow with dynamic MR imaging and presaturation bolus tracking. Radiology. 1989;171(2):551–556. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704823.
    1. Mattle H., Edelman R. R., Wentz K. U., Reis M. A., Atkinson D. J., Ellert T. Middle cerebral artery: Determination of flow velocities with MR angiography. Radiology. 1991;181(2):527–530. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924799.
    1. Kim S. E., Parker D. L. Time-of-flight angiography. In: Carr J. C., Carroll T. J., editors. Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Principles and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag; 2012. pp. 39–50.
    1. Hoogeveen R. M., Bakker C. J. G., Viergever M. A. Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1998;8(6):1228–1235. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880080608.
    1. Parker D. L., Yuan C., Blatter D. D. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1991;17(2):434–451. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910170215.
    1. Atkinson D., Brant-Zawadzki M., Gillan G., Purdy D., Laub G. Improved MR angiography: magnetization transfer suppression with variable flip angle excitation and increased resolution. Radiology. 1994;190(3):892–894. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115646.
    1. Cecchi E., Giglioli C., Valente S., et al. Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2011;214(2):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.09.008.
    1. Harloff A., Nußbaumer A., Bauer S., et al. In vivo assessment of wall shear stress in the atherosclerotic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;63(6):1529–1536. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22383.
    1. Stalder A. F., Russe M. F., Frydrychowicz A., Bock J., Hennig J., Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2008;60(5):1218–1231. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21778.
    1. Gu T., Korosec F. R., Block W. F., et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2005;26:743–749.
    1. Yamashita S., Isoda H., Hirano M., et al. Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2007;25(3):473–478. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20828.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner