Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal

Christopher G Fairburn, Emily R Rothwell, Christopher G Fairburn, Emily R Rothwell

Abstract

Objective: Smartphone applications (apps) are proliferating and health-related apps are particularly popular. The aim of this study was to identify, characterize, and evaluate the clinical utility of apps designed either for people with eating disorders or for eating disorder professionals.

Method: A search of the major app stores identified 805 potentially relevant apps, of which 39 were primarily designed for people with eating disorders and five for professionals.

Results: The apps for people with eating disorders had four main functions. Most common was the provision of advice, the quality of which ranged from sound to potentially harmful. Five apps included self-assessment tools but only two used methods that would generally be viewed as reliable. Four apps had the self-monitoring of eating habits as a major feature. Entering information into these apps could be accomplished with varying degrees of ease, but viewing it was more difficult. One app allowed the transfer of information between patients and clinicians.

Discussion: The enthusiasm for apps outstrips the evidence supporting their use. Given their popularity, it is suggested that clinicians evaluate app use as part of routine assessment. The clinical utility of the existing apps is not clear. Some are capable of tracking key features over time, but none has the functions required for analytic self-monitoring as in cognitive behavioral treatments. The full potential of apps has yet to be realized. Specialized apps could be designed to augment various forms of treatment, and there is the possibility that they could deliver an entire personalized intervention.

Keywords: Apps; assessment; cognitive behavior therapy; eating disorders; mobile technology; recording; self-monitoring; smartphones; treatment.

© 2015 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References

    1. Statista. Number of apps available in leading app stores 2014. July 2014. [online]. Available at: . Accessed on July 31, 2014.
    1. Xu Q, Erman J, Gerber A, Mao Z, Pang J, Venkataraman S. Identifying diverse usage behaviors of smartphone apps. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, 2011, ACM, New York, pp. 329–344.
    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Mobile Health 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project; 2012. [online]. Available at: . Accessed on July 31, 2014
    1. research2guidance . Mobile Health Market Report 2013–2017: The Commercialization of mHealth Applications, Vol. 3 Berlin: research2 guidance, 2013.
    1. Aitken M, Gauntlett C. Patient Apps for Improved Healthcare from Novelty to Mainstream. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics, 2013.
    1. Luxton DD, McCann RA, Bush NE, Mishkind MC, Reger GM. mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychol Res Pract 2011;42:505–512.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
    1. Fairburn CG. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
    1. Waller G, Cordery H, Costorphine E, Hinrichsen H, Lawson R, Mountford V, et al. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders: A Comprehensive Treatment Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    1. Juarascio AS, Manasse SM, Goldstein SP, Forman EM, Butryn ML. Review of smartphone applications for the treatment of eating disorders. Eur Eating Disord Rev 2015;23:1–11.
    1. Loucas CE, Fairburn CG, Whittington C, Pennant ME, Stockton S, Kendall T. E‐therapy in the treatment and prevention of eating disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Behav Res Ther 2014;63:122–131.
    1. Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, Clarke J, Birch MR, Christensen H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e247.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner