Subjective health complaints and self-rated health: are expectancies more important than socioeconomic status and workload?

Eline Ree, Magnus Odeen, Hege R Eriksen, Aage Indahl, Camilla Ihlebæk, Jørn Hetland, Anette Harris, Eline Ree, Magnus Odeen, Hege R Eriksen, Aage Indahl, Camilla Ihlebæk, Jørn Hetland, Anette Harris

Abstract

Background: The associations between socioeconomic status (SES), physical and psychosocial workload and health are well documented. According to The Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress (CATS), learned response outcome expectancies (coping, helplessness, and hopelessness) are also important contributors to health. This is in part as independent factors for health, but coping may also function as a buffer against the impact different demands have on health.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative effect of SES (as measured by level of education), physical workload, and response outcome expectancies on subjective health complaints (SHC) and self-rated health, and if response outcome expectancies mediate the effects of education and physical workload on SHC and self-rated health.

Methods: A survey was carried out among 1,746 Norwegian municipal employees (mean age 44.2, 81 % females). Structural Equation Models with SHC and self-rated health as outcomes were conducted. Education, physical workload, and response outcome expectancies, were the independent 28 variables in the model.

Results: Helplessness/hopelessness had a stronger direct effect on self-rated health and SHC than education and physical workload, for both men and women. Helplessness/hopelessness fully mediated the effect of physical workload on SHC for men (0.121), and mediated 30 % of a total effect of 0.247 for women. For women, education had a small but significant indirect effect through helplessness/hopelessness on self-rated health (0.040) and SHC (-0.040), but no direct effects were found. For men, there was no effect of education on SHC, and only a direct effect on self-rated health (0.134).

Conclusions: The results indicated that helplessness/hopelessness is more important for SHC and health than well-established measures on SES such as years of education and perceived physical workload in this sample. Helplessness/hopelessness seems to function as a mechanism between physical workload and health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Parameter estimates for final model in women. The circles represent latent variables. The squares represent observed variables. All path coefficients are significant at p < 0.01
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Parameter estimates for final model in men. The circles represent latent variables. The squares represent observed variables. All path coefficients are significant at p < 0.01

References

    1. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, et al. Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol. 1994;49(1):15–24. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15.
    1. Torgersen TP, Giæver Ø, Stigen OT. Developing an intersectoral national strategy to reduce social inequalities in health. The Norwegian Case. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Affairs; 2007.
    1. Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, Bartley M, Lissau I, Regidor AM, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. 34. 2005:295–305.
    1. Van Lenthe FJ, Schrijvers CTM, Droomers M, Joung IMA, Louwman MJ, Mackenbach JP. Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health. The Dutch GLOBE study. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14:63–70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.1.63.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ihlebæk C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC) Scand J Public Health. 1999;1:63–72. doi: 10.1177/14034948990270010401.
    1. Indregard A-M, Ihlebæk C, Eriksen H. Modern Health worries, subjective health complaints, health care utilization, and sick leave in the Norwegian working population. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2012:1–7.
    1. Ihlebæk C, Eriksen HR. Occupational and social variation in subjective health complaints. Occup Med. 2003;53:270–278. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqg060.
    1. Ihlebæk C, Brage S, Eriksen HR. Health Complaints and Sickness absence in Norway, 1996–2003. Occup Med. 2007;57:43–49. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql107.
    1. NAV. Sykefraværstilfeller 2. kv 2001–2010. Diagnose og kjønn. Antall og prosent Oslo2010 [updated 21.09; cited 2010 07.11]. Available from: .
    1. Tellnes G, Svendsen K, Bruusgaard D, Bjerkedal T. Incidence of sickness certification. Proposal for use as a health status indicator. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989;7(2):111–117. doi: 10.3109/02813438909088657.
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO; 2006
    1. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x.
    1. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M, Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(5):517–528. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00045-0.
    1. Heistaro S, Jousilahti P, Lahelma E, Vartiainen E, Puska P. Self rated health and mortality: a long term prospective study in eastern Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:227–232. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.4.227.
    1. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Heal Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21–37. doi: 10.2307/2955359.
    1. Odéen M, Westerlund H, Theorell T, Leineweber C, Eriksen H, Ursin H. Expectancies, socioeconomic status, and self-rated health: use of the simplified TOMCATS questionnaire. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2012:1–10.
    1. Huisman M, van Lenthe F, Mackenbach J. The predictive ability of self-assessed health for mortality in different educational groups. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(6):1207–1213. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym095.
    1. Brekke M, Hjortdahl P, Kvien TK. Severity of musculoskeletal pain: relations to socioeconomic inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(2):221–228. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00018-1.
    1. Borg V, Kristensen TS. Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1019–1030. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00011-3.
    1. Adler NE, Snibbe AC. The role of psychosocial processes in explaining the gradient between socioeconomic status and health. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12(4):119–123. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01245.
    1. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic; 1990.
    1. Kaikkonen R, Rahkonen O, Lallukka T, Lahelma E. Physical and psychosocial working conditions as explanations for occupational class inequalities in self-rated health. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(5):458–463. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp095.
    1. Bauer GF, Huber CA, Jenny GJ, Muller F, Hammig O. Socioeconomic status, working conditions and self-rated health in Switzerland: explaining the gradient in men and women. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(1):23–30. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7077-2.
    1. Mehlum IS, Kristensen P, Kjuus H, Wergeland E. Are occupational factors important determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in musculoskeletal pain? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34(4):250–259. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1269.
    1. Siegrist J, Marmot MG. Health inequalities and the psychosocial environment—two scientific challenges. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1463–1473. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00349-6.
    1. Gillen M, Yen IH, Trupin L, Swig L, Rugulies R, Mullen K, et al. The association of socioeconomic status and psychosocial and physical workplace factors with musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(4):245–260. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20429.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Subjective health complaints: is coping more important than control? Work Stress. 1999;13(3):238–252. doi: 10.1080/026783799296048.
    1. Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
    1. Ursin H, Eriksen HR. The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29:567–592. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00091-X.
    1. Christie AM, Barling J. Disentangling the indirect links between socioeconomic status and health: the dynamic roles of work stressors and personal control. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(6):1466–1478. doi: 10.1037/a0016847.
    1. Kristenson M, Eriksen HR, Sluiter JK, Starke D, Ursin H. Psychobiological mechanisms of socioeconomic differences in health. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1511–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00353-8.
    1. Kristenson M. Socio-economic position and health: the role of coping. In: Siegrist J, Marmot M, editors. Social inequalities in health new evidence and policy implications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 127–151.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Social inequalities in health: biological, cognitive and learning theory perspectives. Norsk Epidemiol. 2002;12(1):33–38.
    1. Olff M, Brosschot JF, Godaert G. Coping styles and health. Personal Individ Differ. 1993;15(1):81–90. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90044-4.
    1. Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1998;74(3):763–773. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763.
    1. Ruchkin VV, Eisemann M, Hägglöf B. Coping styles and psychosomatic problems: are they related? Psychopathology. 2000;33(5):235–239. doi: 10.1159/000029151.
    1. Eriksen HR, Olff M, Ursin H. The CODE: a revised battery of coping and defense and its relations to subjective health. Scand J Psychol. 1997;38:175–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00025.
    1. Kristenson M, Olsson AG, Kucinskiene Z. Good self-rated health is related to psychosocial resources and a strong cortisol response to acute stress: The LiVicordia study of middle-aged men. Int J Behav Med. 2005;12(3):153–160. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1203_4.
    1. Valkonen T. Adult mortality and level of education: a comparison of six countries. In: Fox J, editor. Health inequalities in European countries. Aldershot: Gower; 1989. pp. 142–160.
    1. Ihlebæk C, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Prevalence of subjective health complaints (SHC) in Norway. Scand J Public Health. 2002;30:20–29. doi: 10.1177/14034948020300010701.
    1. . Ibedrift—a trial comparing a new approach to musculoskeletal pain consisting of education and peer involvement to treatment as usual: ; 2008 [cited 2008 25]. Available from: .
    1. Selig JP, K.J. P. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: an interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects 2008 [cited 2012 12.04.13]. Available from: .
    1. Brown MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. pp. 445–455.
    1. Bentler PM. EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software; 1992.
    1. Roth PL. Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology. 1994;47:537–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x.
    1. Schreuder JAH, Roelen CAM, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJL, Mageroy N, Pallesen S, et al. Coping styles relate to health and work environment of Norwegian and Dutch hospital nurses: a comparative study. Nurs Outlook. 2012;60(1):37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.05.005.
    1. Karademas EC, Hondronikola I. The impact of illness acceptance and helplessness to subjective health, and their stability over time: a prospective study in a sample of cardiac patients. Psychol Health Med. 2010;15(3):336–346. doi: 10.1080/13548501003668265.
    1. Kinzl JF, Traweger C, Trefalt E, Riccabona U, Lederer W. Work stress and gender-dependent coping strategies in anesthesiologists at a university hospital. J Clin Anesth. 2006;19:334–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.08.014.
    1. Davis KG, Heaney CA. The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: underlying methodological issues. Clin Biomech. 2000;15(6):389–406. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00101-1.
    1. Veenhoven R. Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Assess Qual Life Living Cond Guide Natl Policy. 2002;11:33–45. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3.
    1. Barne- likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet. Meld. St. 6 (2010–2011). Melding til Stortinget: Likestilling for likelønn. In: Barne- l-oi, editor. Oslo: Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet; 2010.
    1. Aarø LE. Fra spørreskjemakonstruksjon til multivariat analyse av data: En innføring i survey-metoden. 2. Bergen: Universitetet i Bergen; 2007.
    1. Rappaport J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol. 1987;15(2):121–148. doi: 10.1007/BF00919275.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner