Cost-effectiveness and economies of scale of a mass radio campaign to promote household life-saving practices in Burkina Faso

Frida Kasteng, Joanna Murray, Simon Cousens, Sophie Sarrassat, Jennifer Steel, Nicolas Meda, Moctar Ouedraogo, Roy Head, Josephine Borghi, Frida Kasteng, Joanna Murray, Simon Cousens, Sophie Sarrassat, Jennifer Steel, Nicolas Meda, Moctar Ouedraogo, Roy Head, Josephine Borghi

Abstract

Introduction: Child health promotion through mass media has not been rigorously evaluated for cost-effectiveness in low-income and middle-income countries. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a mass radio campaign on health-seeking behaviours for child survival within a trial in Burkina Faso and at national scale.

Methods: We collected provider cost data prospectively alongside a 35-month cluster randomised trial in rural Burkina Faso in 2012-2015. Out-of-pocket costs of care-seeking were estimated through a household survey. We modelled intervention effects on child survival based on increased care-seeking and estimated the intervention's incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted versus current practice. Model uncertainty was gauged using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We projected the ICER of national-scale implementation in five sub-Saharan countries with differing media structures. All costs are in 2015 USD.

Results: The provider cost of the campaign was $7 749 128 ($9 146 101 including household costs). The campaign broadcast radio spots 74 480 times and 4610 2-hour shows through seven local radio stations, reaching approximately 2.4 million people including 620 000 direct beneficiaries (pregnant women and children under five). It resulted in an average estimated 24% increase in care-seeking for children under five and a 7% reduction in child mortality per year. The ICER was estimated at $94 ($111 including household costs (95% CI -38 to 320)). The projected provider cost per DALY averted of a national level campaign in Burkina Faso, Burundi, Malawi, Mozambique and Niger in 2018-2020, varied between $7 in Malawi to $27 in Burundi.

Conclusion: This study suggests that mass-media campaigns can be very cost-effective in improving child survival in areas with high media penetration and can potentially benefit from considerable economies of scale.

Trial registration number: NCT01517230; Results.

Keywords: child health; cluster randomized trial; health economics; health education and promotion.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RH is the CEO of DMI. JM is an employee of DMI and JS is a former employee of DMI. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tornado diagram of the percentage change in the base case ICER from one-way sensitivity analyses of key input variables. Light blue bars indicate that the input variable was at its minimum plausible value, whereas dark blue bars indicate that the input variable was at its maximum plausible value. The relative impact on the ICER is illustrated through the magnitude of the bars and the indicated percentages. ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Acceptability curve. In our PSA, the within-trial analysis of the mass media campaign in Burkina Faso had a less than 1% probability of being ‘highly attractive’ but an 93% probability of being ‘attractive’ as per the generic low-income country thresholds suggested by the World Bank in 1993, updated to 2015 USD. It had a >99% probability of being ‘highly cost-effective’ in Burkina Faso based on the WHO-CHOICE suggested threshold of the country’s GDP per capita. DALY, disability-adjusted life year; GDP, gross domestic product; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; PSA, probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

References

    1. Victora CG, Requejo JH, Barros AJ, et al. . Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2016;387:2049–59. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00519-X
    1. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan 2004;19:69–79. 10.1093/heapol/czh009
    1. Mugisha F, Bocar K, Dong H, et al. . The two faces of enhancing utilization of health-care services: determinants of patient initiation and retention in rural Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:572–9.
    1. Hutchinson P, Wheeler J. The cost-effectiveness of health communication programs: what do we know? J Health Commun 2006;11(Suppl 2):7–45. 10.1080/10810730600973862
    1. Naugle DA, Hornik RC. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mass media interventions for child survival in low- and middle-income countries. J Health Commun 2014;19(Suppl 1):190–215. 10.1080/10810730.2014.918217
    1. Borghi J, Guinness L, Ouedraogo J, et al. . Is hygiene promotion cost-effective? A case study in Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health 2002;7:960–9. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00954.x
    1. Bowen HL. Impact of a mass media campaign on bed net use in Cameroon. Malar J 2013;12:36 10.1186/1475-2875-12-36
    1. Hutchinson P, Lance P, Guilkey DK, et al. . Measuring the cost-effectiveness of a national health communication program in rural Bangladesh. J Health Commun 2006;11(Suppl 2):91–121. 10.1080/10810730600974647
    1. Head R, Murray J, Sarrassat S, et al. . Can mass media interventions reduce child mortality? Lancet 2015;386:97–100. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61649-4
    1. Sarrassat S, Meda N, Badolo H, et al. . Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e330–41. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30004-4
    1. Murray J, Head R, Sarrassat S, et al. . Modelling the effect of a mass radio campaign on child mortality using facility utilisation data and the Lives Saved Tool (LiST): findings from a cluster randomised trial in Burkina Faso. BMJ Global Health 2018. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000808 [Epub ahead of print 2018].
    1. Liu L, Black RE, Cousens S, et al. . Causes of child death: comparison of MCEE and GBD 2013 estimates. Lancet 2015;385:2461–2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61132-1
    1. WHO. Global Health Observatory. 2016.
    1. Annuaire Statistique. Burkina Faso Ministere de la Sante, secretariate general, direction general de l’information et des statistiques sanitaires. 2011.
    1. World_Bank. World bank open data. 2016.
    1. Rapport sur les subventions publiques dans le secteur de la sante. Commission_d’Enquête_Parlementaire_sur_les_Subventions_Publiques_dans_le_Secteur_de_la_Santé, editor. Ouagadougou: Assemblee Nationale Burkina Faso. 2012.
    1. Point de presse du gouvernement du 17 mars 2016: la déclaration liminaire du ministre de la Santé. 2016.
    1. Sarrassat S, Meda N, Ouedraogo M, et al. . Behavior change after 20 months of a radio campaign addressing key lifesaving family behaviors for child survival: midline results from a cluster randomized trial in rural Burkina Faso. Glob Health Sci Pract 2015;3:557–76. 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00153
    1. Murray J, Remes P, Ilboudo R, et al. . The saturation+ approach to behavior change: case study of a child survival radio campaign in Burkina Faso. Glob Health Sci Pract 2015;3:544–56. 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00049
    1. Belaid L, Ridde V. Contextual factors as a key to understanding the heterogeneity of effects of a maternal health policy in Burkina Faso? Health Policy Plan 2015;30:309–21. 10.1093/heapol/czu012
    1. Marschall P, Flessa S. Expanding access to primary care without additional budgets? A case study from Burkina Faso. Eur J Health Econ 2008;9:393–403. 10.1007/s10198-007-0095-9
    1. Marschall P, Flessa S. Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis. Health Econ Rev 2011;1:5 10.1186/2191-1991-1-5
    1. Kumaranayake L. The real and the nominal? Making inflationary adjustments to cost and other economic data. Health Policy Plan 2000;15:230–4. 10.1093/heapol/15.2.230
    1. Oanda. Oanda average exchange rate tables Mar 2012-Jan 2015. 2016.
    1. Stover J, McKinnon R, Winfrey B. Spectrum: a model platform for linking maternal and child survival interventions with AIDS, family planning and demographic projections. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39(Suppl 1):i7–i10. 10.1093/ije/dyq016
    1. WHO. World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2016.
    1. Briggs AH, Weinstein MC, Fenwick EA, et al. . Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-6. Med Decis Making 2012;32:722–32. 10.1177/0272989X12458348
    1. Polsky D, Glick HA, Willke R, et al. . Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. Health Econ 1997;6:243–52. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<243::AID-HEC269>;2-Z
    1. Shillcutt SD, Walker DG, Goodman CA, et al. . Cost effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the debates surrounding decision rules. Pharmacoeconomics 2009;27:903–17. 10.2165/10899580-000000000-00000
    1. Mangham-Jefferies L, Pitt C, Cousens S, et al. . Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:243 10.1186/1471-2393-14-243
    1. Horton S, Levin C. Cost-effectiveness of Interventions for Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health : Black RE, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M, Walker N, Disease control priorites: maternal, newborn, and child health. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank, 2016.
    1. Borghi J, Thapa B, Osrin D, et al. . Economic assessment of a women’s group intervention to improve birth outcomes in rural Nepal. Lancet 2005;366:1882–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67758-6
    1. Laxminarayan R, Chow J, Shahid-Salles SA. Intervention Cost-Effectiveness: Overview of Main Messages : Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd edn Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2006:35–86.
    1. Ory MG, Lee Smith M, Mier N, et al. . The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium. Am J Health Behav 2010;34:647–59. 10.5993/AJHB.34.6.2
    1. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010;376:1261–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner