Influenza symptoms and their impact on elderly adults: randomised trial of AS03-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines

Gerrit A van Essen, Jiri Beran, Jeanne-Marie Devaster, Christelle Durand, Xavier Duval, Meral Esen, Ann R Falsey, Gregory Feldman, Pierre Gervais, Bruce L Innis, Martina Kovac, Odile Launay, Geert Leroux-Roels, Janet E McElhaney, Shelly McNeil, Mohammed Oujaa, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios, Richard H Osborne, Lidia Oostvogels, Gerrit A van Essen, Jiri Beran, Jeanne-Marie Devaster, Christelle Durand, Xavier Duval, Meral Esen, Ann R Falsey, Gregory Feldman, Pierre Gervais, Bruce L Innis, Martina Kovac, Odile Launay, Geert Leroux-Roels, Janet E McElhaney, Shelly McNeil, Mohammed Oujaa, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios, Richard H Osborne, Lidia Oostvogels

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are particularly relevant in influenza vaccine trials in the elderly where reduction in symptom severity could prevent illness-related functional impairment.

Objectives: To evaluate PROs in people aged ≥ 65 years receiving two different vaccines.

Methods: This was a phase III, randomised, observer-blind study (NCT00753272) of the AS03-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent split-virion influenza vaccine (AS03-TIV) versus non-adjuvanted vaccine (TIV). Using the FluiiQ questionnaire, symptom (systemic, respiratory, total) and life impact (activities, emotions, relationships) scores were computed as exploratory endpoints, with minimal important difference (MID) in influenza severity between vaccines considered post-hoc as >7%. Vaccine efficacy of AS03-TIV relative to TIV in severe influenza (hospitalisation, complication, most severe one-third of episodes based on the area under the curve for systemic symptom score) was calculated post-hoc. The main analyses (descriptive) were conducted in the according-to-protocol cohort (n = 280 AS03-TIV, n = 315 TIV) for influenza confirmed by culture or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Results: Mean systemic symptom, total symptom and impact on activities scores were lower with AS03-TIV versus TIV. Mean respiratory symptom, impact on emotions and impact on relationships scores were similar. Influenza tended to be less severe with AS03-TIV, but the MID was reached only for impact on activities (mean 9.0%). Relative vaccine efficacy in severe influenza was 29.38% (95% CI: 7.60-46.02).

Conclusions: AS03-TIV had advantages over TIV in impact on systemic symptoms and activities as measured by the FluiiQ in elderly people. Higher efficacy of AS03-TIV relative to TIV was shown for prevention of severe illness.

Keywords: AS03-adjuvanted vaccine; FluiiQ; elderly; influenza; patient-reported outcomes.

© 2014 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total symptom, systemic symptom and respiratory symptom scores in the influenza-confirmed subcohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact on daily activities, emotions and relationships scores in the influenza-confirmed subcohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Vaccine efficacy of the AS03-TIV relative to the TIV for severe influenza-confirmed episodes and severe ILI episodes (based on systemic symptom score). Severe illness was defined as resulting in hospitalisation or complication (death, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure), or illness with an AUC (Day 0–Day 7) for the systemic symptom score in the top one-third of all episodes.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza – United States, 1976-2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1057–1062.
    1. Pitman RJ, Melegaro A, Gelb D, Siddiqui MR, Gay NJ, Edmunds WJ. Assessing the burden of influenza and other respiratory infections in England and Wales. J Infect. 2007;54:530–538.
    1. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004;292:1333–1340.
    1. Osterholm MT, Kelley NS, Sommer A, Belongia EA. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:36–44.
    1. Jefferson T, Di Pietrantonj C, Al-Ansary LA, Ferroni E, Thorning S, Thomas RE. Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2:CD004876.
    1. Langley JM, Risi G, Caldwell M, et al. Dose-sparing H5N1 A/Indonesia/05/2005 pre-pandemic influenza vaccine in adults and elderly adults: a phase III, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1729–1738.
    1. Leroux-Roels I, Borkowski A, Vanwolleghem T, et al. Antigen sparing and cross-reactive immunity with an adjuvanted rH5N1 prototype pandemic influenza vaccine: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:580–589.
    1. Heijmans S, De Meulemeester M, Reynders P, et al. Immunogenicity profile of a 3.75-μg hemagglutinin pandemic rH5N1 split virion AS03A-adjuvanted vaccine in elderly persons: a randomized trial. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1054–1062.
    1. Lasko B, Reich D, Madan A, Roman F, Li P, Vaughn D. Rapid immunization against H5N1: a randomized trial evaluating homologous and cross-reactive immune responses to AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccination in adults. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:574–581.
    1. Nicholson KG, Abrams KR, Batham S, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose schedule of whole-virion and AS03A-adjuvanted 2009 influenza A (H1N1) vaccines: a randomised, multicentre, age-stratified, head-to-head trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:91–101.
    1. Van Buynder PG, Konrad S, Van Buynder JL, et al. The comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the elderly. Vaccine. 2013;31:6122–6128.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available at (Accessed 7 February 2013)
    1. Osborne RH, Norquist JM, Elsworth GR, et al. Development and validation of the Influenza Intensity and Impact Questionnaire (FluiiQ™) Value Health. 2011;14:687–699.
    1. McElhaney JE, Beran J, Devaster J-M, et al. AS03-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine against seasonal influenza in elderly people: a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:485–496.
    1. Vesikari T, Beran J, Durviaux S, et al. Use of real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) as a diagnostic tool for influenza infection in a vaccine efficacy trial. J Clin Virol. 2012;53:22–28.
    1. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1977;39:1–38.
    1. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 72. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
    1. Wyrwich KW, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Acaster S. Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:475–483.
    1. Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, Sloan JA, Lenderking WR, Aaronson NK. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:70.
    1. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–383.
    1. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) The compelling need for game-changing influenza vaccines. An analysis of the influenza vaccine enterprise and recommendations for the future. October 2012. Available at (Accessed 20 November 2012)
    1. Gill TM, Allore HG, Holford TR, Guo Z. Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older persons. JAMA. 2004;292:2115–2124.
    1. McElhaney JE, Xie D, Hager WD, et al. T cell responses are better correlates of vaccine protection in the elderly. J Immunol. 2006;176:6333–6339.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner