Validity of Newborn Clinical Assessment to Determine Gestational Age in Bangladesh

Anne Cc Lee, Luke C Mullany, Karima Ladhani, Jamal Uddin, Dipak Mitra, Parvez Ahmed, Parul Christian, Alain Labrique, Sushil K DasGupta, R Peter Lokken, Mohammed Quaiyum, Abdullah H Baqui, Projahnmo Study Group, Anne Cc Lee, Luke C Mullany, Karima Ladhani, Jamal Uddin, Dipak Mitra, Parvez Ahmed, Parul Christian, Alain Labrique, Sushil K DasGupta, R Peter Lokken, Mohammed Quaiyum, Abdullah H Baqui, Projahnmo Study Group

Abstract

Background: Gestational age (GA) is frequently unknown or inaccurate in pregnancies in low-income countries. Early identification of preterm infants may help link them to potentially life-saving interventions.

Methods: We conducted a validation study in a community-based birth cohort in rural Bangladesh. GA was determined by pregnancy ultrasound (<20 weeks). Community health workers conducted home visits (<72 hours) to assess physical/neuromuscular signs and measure anthropometrics. The distribution, agreement, and diagnostic accuracy of different clinical methods of GA assessment were determined compared with early ultrasound dating.

Results: In the live-born cohort (n = 1066), the mean ultrasound GA was 39.1 weeks (SD 2.0) and prevalence of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was 11.4%. Among assessed newborns (n = 710), the mean ultrasound GA was 39.3 weeks (SD 1.6) (8.3% preterm) and by Ballard scoring the mean GA was 38.9 weeks (SD 1.7) (12.9% preterm). The average bias of the Ballard was -0.4 weeks; however, 95% limits of agreement were wide (-4.7 to 4.0 weeks) and the accuracy for identifying preterm infants was low (sensitivity 16%, specificity 87%). Simplified methods for GA assessment had poor diagnostic accuracy for identifying preterm births (community health worker prematurity scorecard [sensitivity/specificity: 70%/27%]; Capurro [5%/96%]; Eregie [75%/58%]; Bhagwat [18%/87%], foot length <75 mm [64%/35%]; birth weight <2500 g [54%/82%]). Neonatal anthropometrics had poor to fair performance for classifying preterm infants (areas under the receiver operating curve 0.52-0.80).

Conclusions: Newborn clinical assessment of GA is challenging at the community level in low-resource settings. Anthropometrics are also inaccurate surrogate markers for GA in settings with high rates of fetal growth restriction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01572532.

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Projahnmo Saving Lives at Birth Gestational Age Validation Flowchart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of GA by early ultrasound versus original Ballard score.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Bland-Altman plots of Ballard versus early ultrasound for GA dating. A, All infants, no significant trend. B, AGA infants, no significant trend. C, SGA infants, significant trend line of difference (P < .01), bias = 0.7146235* (average Ballard_US) – 29.00176.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Diagnostic accuracy of physical anthropometrics to identify preterm (

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner