A first-in-human study of AMG 208, an oral MET inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

David S Hong, Peter Rosen, A Craig Lockhart, Siqing Fu, Filip Janku, Razelle Kurzrock, Rabia Khan, Benny Amore, Isaac Caudillo, Hongjie Deng, Yuying C Hwang, Robert Loberg, Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith, Darrin M Beaupre, Peter Lee, David S Hong, Peter Rosen, A Craig Lockhart, Siqing Fu, Filip Janku, Razelle Kurzrock, Rabia Khan, Benny Amore, Isaac Caudillo, Hongjie Deng, Yuying C Hwang, Robert Loberg, Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith, Darrin M Beaupre, Peter Lee

Abstract

Background: This first-in-human study evaluated AMG 208, a small-molecule MET inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: Three to nine patients were enrolled into one of seven AMG 208 dose cohorts (25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg). Patients received AMG 208 orally on days 1 and days 4-28 once daily. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AMG 208.

Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Six dose-limiting toxicities were observed: grade 3 increased aspartate aminotransferase (200 mg), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (200 mg), grade 4 acute myocardial infarction (300 mg), grade 3 prolonged QT (300 mg), and two cases of grade 3 hypertension (400 mg). The MTD was not reached. The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was anemia (n = 3) followed by hypertension, prolonged QT, and thrombocytopenia (two patients each). AMG 208 exposure increased linearly with dose; mean plasma half-life estimates were 21.4-68.7 hours. One complete response (prostate cancer) and three partial responses (two in prostate cancer, one in kidney cancer) were observed.

Conclusions: In this study, AMG 208 had manageable toxicities and showed evidence of antitumor activity, particularly in prostate cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00813384.

Keywords: MET; first-in-human; prostate cancer; small molecule; solid tumors.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Benny Amore, Hongjie Deng, Robert Loberg, and Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith are employees of and own stock in Amgen Inc. Darrin M. Beaupre, Yuying C. Hwang, and Isaac Caudillo are former employees of and own stock in Amgen Inc. David S. Hong is a paid consultant for and received honoraria and research funding from Amgen Inc. Razelle Kurzrock received honoraria and research funding from Amgen Inc. A. Craig Lockhart received research funding from Allos, Amgen Inc., Bayer, Teva, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Millennium, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Zenyaku. Filip Janku received research funding from Novartis, Biocartis, and Transgenomic. Peter Rosen, Siqing Fu, Rabia Khan, and Peter Lee have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1. Schematic overview of the dose…
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the dose escalation cohorts
Three to nine patients were enrolled into one of the following seven AMG 208 dose cohorts: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg. A standard 3+3 design was followed in cohorts 1–3, and a modified 3+3+3 design was followed in cohorts 4–7. The protocol was amended to evaluate an intermediate dose level of 150 mg after two DLTs (out of six patients) were observed with 200 mg AMG 208 (red arrow); re-escalation to 200 mg occurred after the 150-mg dose cohort was considered well tolerated (red arrow).
Figure 2. Plasma concentration time profiles of…
Figure 2. Plasma concentration time profiles of AMG 208 on days 1 and 28 following oral administration on days 1 and 4 to 28 once daily
Data points represent means ± standard deviations.
Figure 3. PlGF mean ratio to baseline…
Figure 3. PlGF mean ratio to baseline by treatment arm
Patients who received ≥1 dose of AMG 208 and had a measurable baseline concentration of PlGF were analyzed. The mean log ratio to baseline and standard error were computed, and the results were anti-logged and presented as mean ratio to baseline. Results from day 64 were excluded due to small sample size.
Figure 4. Antitumor activity of AMG 208
Figure 4. Antitumor activity of AMG 208
A. The percent change in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) for the best postdose response is shown. Patients with baseline and ≥1 post-baseline SLD for the target lesion were analyzed. Thirty-seven patients are shown, and 17 were not included because of the following reasons: five patients were evaluated with nontarget lesions only (four prostate and one NSCLC), one patient with NSCLC had progressive disease due to a new lesion, and 11 patients did not have baseline and/or post-baseline scans. B. The percent change in the sum of 18F-FLT SUVmax (1 cm spot) at week 5 day 29. Only patients with both baseline and week 5 day 29 SUVmax (1 cm spot) are shown. *Prostate cancer. †Carcinoma of unknown origin. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A. Complete response in a 66-year-old patient with prostate cancer treated with 300 mg AMG 208 (bone scans). At baseline, bone metastasis was present at T4 and L1. At week 18, evidence of bone metastasis was not observed. B. Partial response in a 63-year-old patient with prostate cancer treated with 400 mg AMG 208 (18F-FLT-PET and CT scans).

References

    1. Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:915–925.
    1. Ma PC, Maulik G, Christensen J, Salgia R. c-Met: structure, functions and potential for therapeutic inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:309–325.
    1. Gherardi E, Birchmeier W, Birchmeier C, Vande Woude G. Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:89–103.
    1. Tanyi J, Tory K, Rigo J, Jr, Nagy B, Papp Z. Evaluation of the tyrosine kinase domain of the Met proto-oncogene in sporadic ovarian carcinomas. Pathol Oncol Res. 1999;5:187–191.
    1. Tjin EP, Groen RW, Vogelzang I, Derksen PW, Klok MD, Meijer HP, van Eeden S, Pals ST, Spaargaren M. Functional analysis of HGF/MET signaling and aberrant HGF-activator expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2006;107:760–768.
    1. Moore SR, Persons DL, Sosman JA, Bobadilla D, Bedell V, Smith DD, Wolman SR, Tuthill RJ, Moon J, Sondak VK, Slovak ML. Detection of copy number alterations in metastatic melanoma by a DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization probe panel and array comparative genomic hybridization: a Southwest Oncology Group study (S9431) Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2927–2935.
    1. Nakajima M, Sawada H, Yamada Y, Watanabe A, Tatsumi M, Yamashita J, Matsuda M, Sakaguchi T, Hirao T, Nakano H. The prognostic significance of amplification and overexpression of c-met and c-erb B-2 in human gastric carcinomas. Cancer. 1999;85:1894–1902.
    1. Ma PC, Jagadeeswaran R, Jagadeesh S, Tretiakova MS, Nallasura V, Fox EA, Hansen M, Schaefer E, Naoki K, Lader A, Richards W, Sugarbaker D, Husain AN, et al. Functional expression and mutations of c-Met and its therapeutic inhibition with SU11274 and small interfering RNA in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1479–1488.
    1. Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Giacomini A, Porte H, Chastre E, Mirossay L, Nordlinger B, Bretti S, Bottardi S, Giordano S. Overexpression and amplification of the met/HGF receptor gene during the progression of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:147–154.
    1. Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Martone T, Maffe A, Maggiora P, Stefani AD, Valente G, Giordano S, Cortesina G, Comoglio PM. Somatic mutations of the MET oncogene are selected during metastatic spread of human HNSC carcinomas. Oncogene. 2000;19:1547–1555.
    1. Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Srinivasan R, Merino M, Choyke P, Choyke L, Coleman J, Toro J, Glenn G, Vocke C, Zbar B, Schmidt LS, Bottaro D, et al. Identification of the genes for kidney cancer: opportunity for disease-specific targeted therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:671s–679s.
    1. Bean J, Brennan C, Shih JY, Riely G, Viale A, Wang L, Chitale D, Motoi N, Szoke J, Broderick S, Balak M, Chang WC, Yu CJ, et al. MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20932–20937.
    1. Engelman J, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Park JO, Lindeman N, Gale CM, Zhao X, Christensen J, Kosaka T, Holmes AJ, Rogers AM, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science. 2007;316:1039–1043.
    1. Sennino B, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Wei Y, Naylor RM, Williamson CW, Bhagwandin V, Tabruyn SP, You W-K, Chapman HA, Christensen JG, Aftab DT, McDonald DM. Suppression of tumor invasion and metastasis by concurrent inhibition of c-Met and VEGF signaling in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Discovery. 2012;2:270–287.
    1. Smith DC, Smith MR, Sweeney C, Elfiky AA, Logothetis C, Corn PG, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Harzstark AL, Gordon MS, Vaishampayan UN, Haas NB, Spira AI, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced prostate cancer: results of a phase II randomized discontinuation trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:412–419.
    1. Elisei R, Schlumberger MJ, Müller SP, Schöffski P, Brose MS, Shah MH, Licitra L, Jarzab B, Medvedev V, Kreissl MC, Niederle B, Cohen EE, Wirth LJ, et al. Cabozantinib in progressive medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3639–3646.
    1. Choueiri TK, Vaishampayan U, Rosenberg JE, Logan TF, Harzstark AL, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Srinivas S, Stein MN, Adams LM, Ottesen LH, Laubscher KH, Sherman L, et al. Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:181–186.
    1. Exelixis. Exelixis Announces Results from the COMET-1 Phase 3 Pivotal Trial of Cabozantinib in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. News Release, September 2, 2014. Available at: . Accessed April 10, 2015.
    1. Liu T, Mendes DE, Berkman CE. From AR to c-Met: Androgen deprivation leads to a signaling pathway switch in prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:1125–1130.
    1. Lennerz JK, Kwak EL, Ackerman A, Michael M, Fox SB, Bergethon K, Lauwers GY, Christensen JG, Wilner KD, Haber DA, Salgia R, Bang YJ, Clark JW, et al. MET amplification identifies a small and aggressive subgroup of esophagogastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of responsiveness to crizotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4803–4810.
    1. Forde PM, Kelly RJ. Genomic alterations in advanced esophageal cancer may lead to subtype-specific therapies. Oncologist. 2013;18:823–832.
    1. Salgia R, Patel P, Bothos J, Yu W, Eppler S, Hegde P, Bai S, Kaur S, Nijem I, Catenacci DV, Peterson A, Ratain MJ, Polite B, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of onartuzumab as a single agent and in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1666–1675.
    1. Gomez-Martin C, Plaza JC, Pazo-Cid R, Salud A, Pons F, Fonseca P, Leon A, Alsina M, Visa L, Rivera F, Galan MC, Del Valle E, Vilardell F, et al. Level of HER2 gene amplification predicts response and overall survival in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4445–4452.
    1. Burtness B, Bauman JE, Galloway T. Novel targets in HPV-negative head and neck cancer: overcoming resistance to EGFR inhibition. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e302–e309.
    1. Katayama R, Aoyama A, Yamori T, Qi J, Oh-hara T, Song Y, Engelman JA, Fujita N. Cytotoxic activity of tivantinib (ARQ 197) is not due solely to c-MET inhibition. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3087–3096.
    1. Goldman JW, Laux I, Chai F, Savage RE, Ferrari D, Garmey EG, Just RG, Rosen LS. Phase 1 dose-escalation trial evaluating the combination of the selective MET (mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor) inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) plus erlotinib. Cancer. 2012;118:5903–5911.
    1. Strickler JH, LoRusso P, Yen C-J, Lin C-C, Kang Y-K, Kaminker P, Ansell P, Bhathena A, Wong S, Dudley MW, Naumovski L, Ramanathan RK. Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, and expansion study of ABT-700, an anti-C-met antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 2507.
    1. Hong DS, LoRusso P, Hamid O, Beaupre DM, Janku F, Khan R, Kittaneh M, Loberg RD, Amore B, Caudillo I, Hwang YC, Tang R, Ngarmchamnanrith G, et al. First-in-human study of AMG 337, a highly selective oral inhibitor of MET, in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 2508)
    1. Bang Y-J, Su W-C, Nam D-H, Lim W-T, Bauer TM, Brana I, Poon RT-P, Hong DS, Lin C-C, Peng B, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Kumar A, et al. Phase I study of the safety and efficacy of INC280 in patients with advanced MET-dependent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 2520^)
    1. Falchook GS, Hong DS, Amin HM, Fu S, Piha-Paul SA, Janku F, Granda JG, Zheng H, Klevesath MB, Köhler K, Bladt F, Johne A, Kurzrock R. Results of the first-in-human phase I trial assessing MSC2156119J (EMD 1214063), an oral selective c-Met inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 2521^)
    1. Angevin E, Spitaleri G, Hollebecque A, De Pas T, Soria J-C, Harnois M, Mazuir F, Assadourian S, De Marinis F. A first-in-human (FIH) phase I study of SAR125844, a novel selective MET kinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation results. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 2506)
    1. Gan HK, Lickliter J, Millward M, Gu Y, SU W, Frigault M, Qi C, MU H. First-in-human phase I study of a selective c-Met inhibitor volitinib (HMP504/AZD6094) in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5s. (suppl; abstr 11111)
    1. Schmidt Slørdahl T, Denayer T, Helen Moen S, Standal T, Børset M, Ververken C, Baade Rø T. Anti-c-MET nanobody - a new potential drug in multiple myeloma treatment. Eur J Haematol. 2013;91:399–410.
    1. Ye L, Ou X, Tian Y, Yu B, Luo Y, Feng B, Lin H, Zhang J, Wu S. Indazoles as potential c-Met inhibitors: design, synthesis and molecular docking studies. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;65:112–118.
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216.
    1. Mita AC, Takimoto CH, Mita M, Tolcher A, Sankhala K, Sarantopoulos J, Valdivieso M, Wood L, Rasmussen E, Sun YN, Zhong ZD, Bass MB, Le N, et al. Phase 1 study of AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin 1/2-neutralizing peptibody, in combination with chemotherapy in adults with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3044–3056.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner