Point-of-care testing of coagulation in patients treated with edoxaban

Florian Härtig, Ingvild Birschmann, Andreas Peter, Sebastian Hörber, Matthias Ebner, Matthias Sonnleitner, Charlotte Spencer, Paula Bombach, Maria-Ioanna Stefanou, Joachim Kuhn, Annerose Mengel, Ulf Ziemann, Sven Poli, Florian Härtig, Ingvild Birschmann, Andreas Peter, Sebastian Hörber, Matthias Ebner, Matthias Sonnleitner, Charlotte Spencer, Paula Bombach, Maria-Ioanna Stefanou, Joachim Kuhn, Annerose Mengel, Ulf Ziemann, Sven Poli

Abstract

Edoxaban, alongside other direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), is increasingly used for prevention of thromboembolism, including stroke. Despite DOAC therapy, however, annual stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation remains 1-2%. Rapid exclusion of relevant anticoagulation is necessary to guide thrombolysis or reversal therapy but, so far, no data exists on the effect of edoxaban on available point-of-care test systems (POCT). To complete our previous investigation on global coagulation-POCT for the detection of DOAC, we evaluated whether CoaguChek®-INR (CC-INR) is capable of safely ruling out edoxaban concentrations above the current treatment thresholds of 30/50 ng/mL in a blood sample. We studied patients receiving a first dose of edoxaban; excluding subjects receiving other anticoagulants. Six blood samples were collected from each patient: before drug intake, 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 h after intake, and at trough (24 h). CC-INR and mass spectrometry for edoxaban concentrations were performed for each time-point. One hundred and twenty blood samples from 20 patients contained 0-302 ng/mL of edoxaban. CC-INR ranged from 0.9 to 2.3. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed strong correlation between CC-INR and edoxaban concentrations (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Edoxaban concentrations > 30 and > 50 ng/mL were ruled out by CC-INR ≤ 1.0 and ≤ 1.1, respectively, with high specificity (> 95%), and a sensitivity of 44% (95%-confidence interval: 30-59%) and 86% (74-93%), respectively. Our study represents the first evaluation of coagulation-POCT in edoxaban-treated patients. CC-POCT is suitable to safely exclude clinically relevant edoxaban concentrations prior to thrombolysis, or guide reversal therapy in stroke patients.

Keywords: Anticoagulation reversal; CoaguChek; DOAC; Point-of-care; Stroke; Thrombolysis.

Conflict of interest statement

F. Härtig and M. Ebner received reimbursement for congress traveling from Bayer. I. Birschmann received speaker’s honoraria from Aspen Germany, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Siemens Healthcare, and CSL Behring, and reimbursement for congress traveling from aspen and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and performed contract research for Siemens Healthcare. Ingvild Birschmann is a member of the advisory board of LFB biomedicaments. U. Ziemann received grants from German Research Foundation, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, European Research Council, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Servier, and Biogen Idec, and consulting honoraria from Pfizer, Bayer Vital, and CorTec (all outside of the present work). S. Poli received speaker’s/consulting honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Werfen, reimbursement for congress traveling from Bayer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim, and research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Helena Laboratories (all outside of the present work). The other authors (A. Peter, S. Hörber, M. Sonnleitner, C. Spencer, P. Bombach, M.-I. Stefanou, J. Kuhn, and A. Mengel) report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Correlation of CoaguChek®-international normalized ratio (CC-INR) values and edoxaban plasma concentrations (dashed line: regression line), b changes in edoxaban plasma concentrations and CC-INR results over the course of the study period (displayed as mean ± one standard deviation), c percentage of edoxaban plasma concentrations below and above the treatment-relevant thresholds of 30 and 50 ng/mL found at different CC-INR levels, and d receiver operating characteristics curve found for CC-INR when testing for detection of samples containing edoxaban plasma concentrations ≤ 30 and ≤ 50  ng/mL
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Percentage of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations below and above the treatment-relevant thresholds of 30 and 50 ng/mL found at different level of CoaguChek®-international normalized ratio (CC-INR), and b receiver operating characteristics curve found for CC-INR when testing for detection of samples containing rivaroxaban plasma concentrations ≤ 30 and ≤ 50 ng/mL
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proposed algorithm for emergency coagulation assessment using the CoaguChek® point-of-care test system (POCT) for rapid decision making in edoxaban and rivaroxaban-treated patients. CC-INR CoaguChek®-international normalized ratio, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant, ICH intracranial hemorrhage

References

    1. Camm AJ, Accetta G, Ambrosio G, Atar D, Bassand JP, Berge E, et al. Evolving antithrombotic treatment patterns for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2017;103:307–314. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309832.
    1. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–2104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907.
    1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
    1. Ahmed N, Steiner T, Caso V, Wahlgren N. Recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 13–15 November 2016. European Stroke Journal. 2017;2:95–102. doi: 10.1177/2396987317699144.
    1. Seiffge DJ, Traenka C, Polymeris A, Hert L, Fisch U, Peters N, et al. Feasibility of rapid measurement of Rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients with acute stroke. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017;43:112–116. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1431-7.
    1. Ebner M, Peter A, Spencer C, Hartig F, Birschmann I, Kuhn J, et al. Point-of-care testing of coagulation in patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Stroke. 2015;46:2741–2747. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010148.
    1. Kuhn J, Gripp T, Flieder T, Hammerschmidt A, Hendig D, Faust I, et al. Measurement of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in human plasma using automated online solid-phase extraction combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its comparison with coagulation assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:347–356. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.017.
    1. Touze E, Gruel Y, Gouin-Thibault I, De Maistre E, Susen S, Sie P, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:747–752. doi: 10.1111/ene.13582.
    1. Levy JH, Ageno W, Chan NC, Crowther M, Verhamme P, Weitz JI, et al. When and how to use antidotes for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:623–627. doi: 10.1111/jth.13227.
    1. Hawes EM, Deal AM, Funk-Adcock D, Gosselin R, Jeanneret C, Cook AM, et al. Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of dabigatran: a cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:1493–1502. doi: 10.1111/jth.12308.
    1. Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–872. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>;2-E.
    1. Steiner T, Freiberger A, Griebe M, Husing J, Ivandic B, Kollmar R, et al. International normalised ratio normalisation in patients with coumarin-related intracranial haemorrhages–the INCH trial: a randomised controlled multicentre trial to compare safety and preliminary efficacy of fresh frozen plasma and prothrombin complex–study design and protocol. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:271–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00560.x.
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
    1. Morishima Y, Kamisato C. Laboratory measurements of the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban: comparison of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and thrombin generation assay. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143:241–247. doi: 10.1309/AJCPQ2NJD3PXFTUG.
    1. Ebner M, Birschmann I, Peter A, Härtig F, Spencer C, Kuhn J, et al. Emergency coagulation assessment during treatment with direct oral anticoagulants: limitations and solutions. Stroke. 2017;48:2457–2463. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017981.
    1. Ebner M, Birschmann I, Peter A, Spencer C, Hartig F, Kuhn J, et al. Point-of-care testing for emergency assessment of coagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Crit Care. 2017;21:32. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1619-z.
    1. Ebner M, Birschmann I, Peter A, Hartig F, Spencer C, Kuhn J, et al. Limitations of specific coagulation tests for direct oral anticoagulants: a critical analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009807. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009807.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner