Delivering transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) to improve symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal: results from a prospective clinical trial

Carlos F Tirado, Stephanie N Washburn, Alejandro Covalin, Caroline Hedenberg, Heather Vanderpool, Caroline Benner, Daniel P Powell, Melanie A McWade, Navid Khodaparast, Carlos F Tirado, Stephanie N Washburn, Alejandro Covalin, Caroline Hedenberg, Heather Vanderpool, Caroline Benner, Daniel P Powell, Melanie A McWade, Navid Khodaparast

Abstract

Background: As pharmacological treatments are the primary option for opioid use disorder, neuromodulation has recently demonstrated efficacy in managing opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS). This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) for managing OWS.

Methods: This prospective inpatient trial included a 30-minute randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind period followed by a 5-day open-label period. Adults with physical dependence on opioids were randomized to receive active or sham tAN following abrupt opioid discontinuation. The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) was used to determine withdrawal level, and participants were required to have a baseline COWS score ≥ 13 before enrollment. The double-blind period of the study occurred during the first 30-minutes to assess the acute effects of tAN therapy compared to a sham control. Group 1 received active tAN during both the 30-minute double-blind period and the 5-day open-label period. Group 2 received passive sham tAN (no stimulation) during the double-blind period, followed by active tAN during the 5-day open-label period. The primary outcome was change in COWS from baseline to 60-minutes of active tAN (pooled across groups, accounting for 30-minute delay). Secondary outcomes included difference in change in COWS scores between groups after 30-minutes of active or sham tAN, change in COWS scores after 120-minutes of active tAN, and change in COWS scores on Days 2-5. Non-opioid comfort medications were administered during the trial.

Results: Across all thirty-one participants, the mean (SD) COWS scores relative to baseline were reduced by 7.0 (4.7) points after 60-minutes of active tAN across both groups (p < 0.0001; Cohen's d = 2.0), demonstrating a significant and clinically meaningful reduction of 45.9%. After 30-minutes of active tAN (Group 1) or sham tAN (Group 2), the active tAN group demonstrated a significantly greater COWS score reduction than the sham tAN group (41.7% vs. 24.1%; p = 0.036). Participants across both groups achieved an average COWS reduction up to 74.7% on Days 2-5.

Conclusion: Results demonstrate tAN is a safe and effective non-opioid approach for reducing symptoms of OWS. This study supported an FDA clearance.

Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04075214 , Identifier: NCT04075214, Release Date: August 28, 2019.

Keywords: Addiction; Non-opioid treatment; Opioid withdrawal symptoms; Transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation; Trigeminal nerve stimulation; Vagus nerve stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

NK, SW, DP, CB, HV, MM and AC are employees and have private equity (stock options or other ownership interest) in Spark Biomedical. CT has private equity in and is a paid consultant of Spark Biomedical.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical Study Design Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Form and Fit of tAN Device Around the Ear Neural Structures
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CONSORT Flow Diagram
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
COWS Scores Across Time in the Pooled Population Without Data Imputation. Legend: *** denotes p < 0.0001. Timepoints denote the number of minutes from the start of active tAN, which is either at the start or end of the double-blind period, depending on group assignment. Dark blue line indicates the mean COWS score of study participants at each timepoint. Orange lines indicate individual participant COWS score at each timepoint
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of COWS Scores: Active and Sham tAN at the end of the double-blind period. Legend: P-value; Two-sided independent Welch’s t-test; Data representing the intent-to-treat population. Group 1 received active tAN and Group 2 received sham tAN (no stimulation) during this period. Colored dots indicate individual COWS score percent reductions for the respective treatment groups

References

    1. Ahmad FB, Rossen LM, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics, 12. 2021. Available at: .
    1. Amiri S, McDonell MG, Denney JT, Buchwald D, Amram O. Disparities in access to opioid treatment programs and office-based buprenorphine treatment across the rural-urban and area deprivation continua: a US Nationwide small area analysis. Value Health. 2021;24(2):188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.08.2098.
    1. Baumgartner JC and Radley C. “The Drug Overdose Mortality Toll in 2020 and Near-Term Actions for Addressing It,” To the Point (blog), July 15, 2021.​ 10.26099/gb4y-r129.
    1. Chiluwal A, et al. Neuroprotective effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation in severe traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07219-3.
    1. Cicco V, Fantozzi M, Cataldo E, Barresi M, Bruschini L, Faraguna U, Manzoni D. Trigeminal, visceral and vestibular inputs may improve cognitive functions by acting through the locus Coeruleus and the ascending reticular activating system: a new hypothesis. Front Neuroanat. 2018;11:130. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00130.
    1. Comer SD, Sullivan MA, Yu E, et al. Injectable, sustained-release naltrexone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(2):210–218. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.210.
    1. Dunn KE, Tompkins DA, Bigelow GE, Strain EC. Efficacy of tramadol extended-release for opioid withdrawal: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(9):885–893. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1838.
    1. DyAnsys. Drug Relief. Available from: . Accessed 1 Aug 2022.
    1. Ellison F, Ellison W, Daulouede JP, et al. Opiate withdrawal and electro-stimulation. Double blind experiments. Encephale. 1987;13(4):225–229.
    1. Evers S. Non-invasive Neurostimulation methods for acute and preventive migraine treatment—a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3302. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153302.
    1. Fanselow EE. Central mechanisms of cranial nerve stimulation for epilepsy. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 4):S247. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.103014.
    1. Fishman M, Tirado C, Alam D, et al. Safety and efficacy of Lofexidine for medically managed opioid withdrawal: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Addict Med. 2019;13(3):169–176. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000474.
    1. Gil-López F, et al. External trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug resistant epilepsy: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimulation. 2020;13(5):1245–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.005.
    1. Han JS, Wang Q. Mobilization of specific neuropeptides by peripheral stimulation of identified frequencies. Physiology. 1992;7(4):176–180. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1992.7.4.176.
    1. Ibrahim RB, Wilson JG, Thorsby ME, Edwards DJ. Effect of buprenorphine on CYP3A activity in rat and human liver microsomes. Life Sci. 2000;66(14):1293–1298. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(00)00436-7.
    1. Janis JE, Hatef DA, Ducic I, et al. Anatomy of the auriculotemporal nerve: variations in its relationship to the superficial temporal artery and implications for the treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(5):1422–1428. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb05.
    1. Jenkins DD, Khodaparast N, O'Leary GH, Washburn SN, Covalin A, Badran BW. Transcutaneous auricular Neurostimulation (tAN): a novel adjuvant treatment in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:648556. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.648556.
    1. Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, Walsh SL, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(18):1290–1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011023431802.
    1. Kolodny A, Courtwright DT, Hwang CS, et al. The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:559–574. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957.
    1. Koob GF. Neurobiology of opioid addiction: opponent process, Hyperkatifeia, and negative reinforcement. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(1):44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.023.
    1. Meade CS, Lukas SE, McDonald LJ, et al. A randomized trial of transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation as adjunctive treatment for opioid detoxification. J Subst Abus Treat. 2010;38(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.05.010.
    1. Mercante B, Ginatempo F, Manca A, Melis F, Enrico P, Deriu F. Anatomo-physiologic basis for auricular stimulation. Med Acupunct. 2018;30(3):141–150. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1254.
    1. Miranda A, Taca A. Neuromodulation with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation is associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal: a multisite, retrospective assessment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44(1):56–63. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1295459.
    1. Neren D, Johnson MD, Legon W, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation and other Neuromodulation methods for treatment of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:308–319. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0203-0.
    1. O'Reardon JP, Cristancho P, Peshek AD. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and treatment of depression: to the brainstem and beyond. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2006;3(5):54.
    1. Pantazis CB, Gonzalez LA, Tunstall BJ, Carmack SA, Koob GF, Vendruscolo LF. Cues conditioned to withdrawal and negative reinforcement: neglected but key motivational elements driving opioid addiction. Sci Adv. 2021;7(15):eabf0364. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf0364.
    1. Park-Lee E, Lipari RN, Hedden SL, Kroutil LA, Porter JD. Receipt of services for substance use and mental health issues among adults: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health; 2018.
    1. Peuker ET, Filler TJ. The nerve supply of the human auricle. Clin Anat. 2002;15(1):35–37. doi: 10.1002/ca.1089.
    1. Qureshi IS, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Tracey KJ, Pavlov VA, Chen ACH. Auricular neural stimulation as a new non-invasive treatment for opioid detoxification. Bioelectron Med. 2020;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s42234-020-00044-6.
    1. Rosenthal SH. Electrosleep: a double-blind clinical study. Biol Psychiatry. 1972;4(2):179–185.
    1. Shiozawa P, et al. Effect of a 10-day trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) protocol for treating major depressive disorder: a phase II, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;44:23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.024.
    1. Sims-Williams H, Matthews JC, Talbot PS, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the periaqueductal gray releases endogenous opioids in humans. Neuroimage. 2017;146:833–842. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.038.
    1. Srivastava AB, Mariani JJ, Levin FR. New directions in the treatment of opioid withdrawal. Lancet. 2020;395(10241):1938–1948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30852-7.
    1. Stanak M, et al. The impact of external trigeminal nerve stimulator (e-TNS) on prevention and acute treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020;412:116725. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116725.
    1. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41. Elsevier; 2015.
    1. Stotts AL, Dodrill CL, Kosten TR. Opioid dependence treatment: options in pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10(11):1727–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.029.
    1. Tompkins DA, Bigelow GE, Harrison JA, Johnson RE, Fudala PJ, Strain EC. Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2009;105(1-2):154–9.
    1. Wesson DR, Ling W. The clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35(2):253–9.
    1. Wheless JW, Gienapp AJ, Ryvlin P. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy update. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;88:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.032.
    1. Yang HM, Yoo YB. Anatomy of the facial nerve at the condylar area: measurement study and clinical implications. Sci World J. 2014;2014:473568. doi: 10.1155/2014/473568.
    1. Young JR, Smani SA, Mischel NA, Kritzer MD, Appelbaum LG, Patkar AA. Non-invasive brain stimulation modalities for the treatment and prevention of opioid use disorder: a systematic review of the literature. J Addict Dis. 2020;38(2):186–199. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1736756.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner