Family planning knowledge, experiences and reproductive desires among women who had experienced a poor obstetric outcome in Lilongwe Malawi: a qualitative study

Agatha Bula, Dawn M Kopp, Suzanne Maman, Lameck Chinula, Mercy Tsidya, Jennifer H Tang, Agatha Bula, Dawn M Kopp, Suzanne Maman, Lameck Chinula, Mercy Tsidya, Jennifer H Tang

Abstract

Background: Perinatal mortality is unacceptably high in low-income countries, including Malawi. Use of family planning to encourage birth spacing may optimize outcomes for subsequent pregnancies. However, the reproductive desires and family planning knowledge of women who have experienced a stillbirth or neonatal death in resource-poor settings are not well understood.

Methods: We examined family planning knowledge, contraceptive practices and barrier to contraceptive use among women who had experienced a poor obstetric outcome at Bwaila Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We performed individual in-depth interviews or through focus group discussion with women who had experienced a stillbirth or early neonatal death, 4-8 weeks after their delivery. NVivo software was used to analyze data for recurrent patterns and themes, and central ideas were extracted to identify the data's core meanings.

Results: We interviewed 46 women who had experienced a poor obstetric outcome. Overall, women were aware of both modern and traditional family planning methods, and the majority were in favour of modern versus traditional methods. They also had knowledge about risks for future complications if they have a short inter-pregnancy interval. However, they faced conflict about whether to use family planning methods for their health, as suggested by their relatives and friends, or to have another child to fulfil their husband's desire, especially among those with no living child. Some had fear about side effects, while others were concerned that use of family planning methods without involving the husband could bring misunderstandings within the family. A number of women had misconceptions about family planning methods, which also served as a barrier to their use.

Conclusion: Although women with a poor obstetric outcome are aware of modern family planning and its health benefits after their delivery, their decision to use a method is complicated by their own desire to protect their own health and the husband's desire for a child, particularly among those women with no living children coupled with fear of side effects and misconceptions. These findings suggest the importance of counselling both the affected woman and her husband about the benefits of family planning use, even after a poor obstetric outcome, to jointly choose the method they feel comfortable to use and dispel any misconceptions.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02674542.

Keywords: Family planning; Malawi; Misconceptions; Neonatal death; Poor obstetric outcome; Reproductive desire; Stillbirth.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Sciences Research Committee of Malawi (Protocol #1354) and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (#14-2677). Women gave written informed consent at the time of enrolment in the language of their choice (Chichewa or English).Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. WHO. Neonatal and perinatal mortality. Internet 2006; 1–75. Available at: . Accessed 15 Aug 2017, 99.
    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.
    1. Sankar MJ, Natarajan CK, Das RR, Agarwal R, Chandrasekaran A, Paul VK. When do newborns die? A systematic review of timing of overall and cause-specific neonatal deaths in developing countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36 Suppl 1:S1–S11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.27.
    1. Rutstein S, Winter R. Contraception needed to avoid high-fertility -risk births, and maternal and child deaths that would be averted. DHS analytical studies. 2015;50. . Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
    1. National Statistical Office (NSO) [Malawi] I . Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–16. Zomba, and Rockville: NSO and ICF; 2017.
    1. Hill K, You D, Inoue M, Oestergaard MZ, Technical Advisory Group of United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality E Child mortality estimation: accelerated progress in reducing global child mortality, 1990–2010. PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001303.
    1. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:152–174. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxq012.
    1. United Nations DoeaSAP. Trends in contraceptive use Worldwide 2015. Contraception 2015; . Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
    1. Sebastian MP, Khan ME, Roychowdhury S. Promoting healthy spacing between pregnancies in India: need for differential education campaigns. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(3):395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.019.
    1. Turner-Bowker DM, Lamoureux RE, Stokes J, et al. Informing a priori sample size estimation in qualitative concept elicitation interview studies for clinical outcome assessment instrument development. Value Health. 2018;21(7):839–842. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.014.
    1. Kabagenyi A, Jennings L, Reid A, Nalwadda G, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women’s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-21.
    1. Chipeta EK, Chimwaza W, Kalilani-Phiri L. Contraceptive knowledge, beliefs and attitudes in rural Malawi: misinformation, misbeliefs and misperceptions. Malawi Med J. 2010;22(2):38–41. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v22i2.58790.
    1. Nansseu JR, Nchinda EC, Katte JC, Nchagnouot FM, Nguetsa GD. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning among women living in the Mbouda health district, Cameroon. Reprod Health. 2015;12:92. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0085-9.
    1. Olugbenga-Bello AI, Adeyemi A, Adeoye O, Salawu M, Aderinoye A, Agbaje M. Contraceptive prevalence and determinants among women of reproductive age group in Ogbomoso, Oyo State. Nigeria. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:33–41. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S94826.
    1. ICPD Hltff . Policy-recommendations-for-the-ICPD-beyond-2014. 2013.
    1. Mboane R, Bhatta MP. Influence of a husband’s healthcare decision making role on a woman’s intention to use contraceptives among Mozambican women. Reprod Health. 2015;12:36. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0010-2.
    1. Shattuck D, Kerner B, Gilles K, Hartmann M, Ng’ombe T, Guest G. Encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: the Malawi Male Motivator project. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(6):1089–1095. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300091.
    1. Olugbenga-Bello AIA-OE, Adewole AO, Adeomi AA, Olarewaju SO. Perceptions, attitude and involvement of men in maternal health care in a Nigerian community. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2013;5:262–270.
    1. Jalang’o R, Thuita F, Barasa SO, Njoroge P. Determinants of contraceptive use among postpartum women in a county hospital in rural KENYA. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4510-6.
    1. Apanga PA, Adam MA. Factors influencing the uptake of family planning services in the Talensi District, Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.10.5301.
    1. Jara D, Dejene T, Taha M. Determinants of high fertility status among married women in Gilgel Gibe Field Research Centre of Jima University, Oromia, Ethiopia: a case control study. Public Health Res. 2013;3(2):9–17.
    1. Singh S, Darroch J, Ashford L, VIassoff M. Adding it up: the cost and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn health: Popline Org. New York: Guttmacher Institute and UN Population Fund; 2009.
    1. Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):151–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x.
    1. DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahman M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG. 2007;114(9):1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01338.x.
    1. Gueye A, Speizer IS, Corroon M, Okigbo CC. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41(4):191–199. doi: 10.1363/intsexrephea.41.4.0191.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner