The pilot, proof of concept REMOTE-COVID trial: remote monitoring use in suspected cases of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV 2)

Fahad Mujtaba Iqbal, Meera Joshi, Gary Davies, Sadia Khan, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Fahad Mujtaba Iqbal, Meera Joshi, Gary Davies, Sadia Khan, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 has ever-increasing attributed deaths. Vital sign trends are routinely used to monitor patients with changes in these parameters preceding an adverse event. Wearable sensors can measure vital signs continuously and remotely, outside of hospital facilities, recognising early clinical deterioration. We aim to determine the feasibility & acceptability of remote monitoring systems for quarantined individuals in a hotel suspected of COVID-19.

Methods: A pilot, proof-of-concept, feasibility trial was conducted in engineered hotels near London airports (May-June 2020). Individuals arriving to London with mild suspected COVID-19 symptoms requiring quarantine, as recommended by Public Health England, or healthcare professionals with COVID-19 symptoms unable to isolate at home were eligible. The SensiumVitals™ patch, measuring temperature, heart & respiratory rates, was applied on arrival for the duration of their stay. Alerts were generated when pre-established thresholds were breeched; trained nursing staff could consequently intervene.

Results: Fourteen individuals (M = 7, F = 7) were recruited; the mean age was 34.9 (SD 11) years. Mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1.8) days. In total, 10 vital alerts were generated across 4 participants, resulting in telephone contact, reassurance, or adjustment of the sensor. No individuals required hospitalisation or virtual general practitioner review.

Discussion: This proof-of-concept trial demonstrated the feasibility of a rapidly implemented model of healthcare delivery through remote monitoring during a pandemic at a hotel, acting as an extension to a healthcare trust. Benefits included reduced viral exposure to healthcare staff, with recognition of clinical deterioration through ambulatory, continuous, remote monitoring using a discrete wearable sensor.

Conclusion: Remote monitoring systems can be applied to hotels to deliver healthcare safely in individuals suspected of COVID-19. Further work is required to evaluate this model on a larger scale.

Trial registration: Clinical trials registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04337489 (07/04/2020).

Keywords: Clinical trial; Monitoring, ambulatory; Patient deterioration; Remote sensing technology.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SensiumVitals monitoring system; permission granted to use image by SensiumVitals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
frequency distribution of participant questionnaire responses
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
frequency distribution of healthcare questionnaire responses

References

    1. Department of Health and Social Care; Public Health England. Coronavirus (COVID-19): latest information and advice - . . Accessed 6 Mar 2020
    1. Public Health England. Stay at home: guidance for households with possible coronavirus (COVID-19) infection - . 2020.. Accessed 6 May 2020
    1. Kenzaka T, Okayama M, Kuroki S, Fukui M, Yahata S, Hayashi H, Kitao A, Sugiyama D, Kajii E, Hashimoto M. Importance of vital signs to the early diagnosis and severity of sepsis: association between vital signs and sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis. Intern Med. 2012;51(8):871–876. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6951.
    1. Smith GB. In-hospital cardiac arrest: is it time for an in-hospital ‘chain of prevention’? Resuscitation. 2010;81(9):1209–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.017.
    1. DeVita MA, Smith GB, Adam SK, et al. “Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis”—a consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid response systems. Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.008.
    1. National Institutes of Clinical Excellence. Acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2007.
    1. Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2. 2017.. Accessed 6 Mar 2020
    1. De Farias FACD, Dagostini CM, Bicca YDA, et al. Remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. Telemed e-Health. 2020;26(5):576–583. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0066.
    1. Bombaci A, Abbadessa G, Trojsi F, et al. Telemedicine for management of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through COVID-19 tail. Neurol Sci. 2020;42(1):9–13. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04783-x.
    1. Martirosyan M, Caliskan K, Theuns DAMJ, Szili-Torok T. Remote monitoring of heart failure: benefits for therapeutic decision making. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15(7):503–515. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1348229.
    1. Iqbal FM, Joshi M, Davies G, Khan S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Design of the pilot, proof of concept REMOTE-COVID trial: remote monitoring use in suspected cases of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00804-4.
    1. Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind. 1996;189:196.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, Frémont P, Gagnon J, Tremblay N, Légaré F. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):241–277. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.
    1. Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, Desmartis M. M-health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2016;23(1):212–220. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv052.
    1. Downey CL, Brown JM, Jayne DG, Randell R. Patient attitudes towards remote continuous vital signs monitoring on general surgery wards: an interview study. Int J Med Inform. 2018;114:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.014.
    1. Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, Phinney D, Curtis S, Roman M, Poon EG, Ferranti J, Katz JN, Tcheng J. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
    1. Downey C, Randell R, Brown ; Julia, et al. Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2018;20. doi:10.2196/10802, 20, 12.
    1. Weenk M, Bredie SJ, Koeneman M, Hesselink G, van Goor H, van de Belt TH. Continuous monitoring of vital signs in the general Ward using wearable devices: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e15471. doi: 10.2196/15471.
    1. Royal College Of Physicians, Royal College Of General Practitioners. Patient care: a unified approach. 2016;20. .
    1. High-Value Care. . Accessed 16 Mar 2021
    1. High Value Care. .Accessed 16 Mar 2021

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner