Perception, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding Sedation Practices among Palliative Care Nurses and Physicians: A Qualitative Study

Margaux Vieille, Lionel Dany, Pierre Le Coz, Sophie Avon, Charlotte Keraval, Sébastien Salas, Cécile Bernard, Margaux Vieille, Lionel Dany, Pierre Le Coz, Sophie Avon, Charlotte Keraval, Sébastien Salas, Cécile Bernard

Abstract

Background: Palliative care teams face complex medical situations on a daily basis. These situations require joint reflection and decision making to propose appropriate patient care. Sometimes, sedation is one of the options to be considered. In addition to medical and technical criteria justifying the use of sedation, multiple psychosocial criteria impact the decision making of palliative care teams and guide, give sense to, and legitimize professional practices. Objective: The main goal of this study was to explore perceptions, experiences, and beliefs of palliative care teams about sedation practices in a legislative context (Claeys-Leonetti law, 2016; France), which authorizes continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death. Methods: This is a qualitative study using 28 semistructured interviews with physicians and nurses working in a palliative care team in France (PACA region). All verbal productions produced during interviews were fully transcribed and the contents analyzed. Findings: Content analysis revealed four themes: (1) sedation as a "good death," (2) emotional experiences of sedations, (3) the practice of CDS, and (4) the ambiguous relationship with the Claeys-Leonetti law. Conclusions: This qualitative study provides evidence of a form of "naturalization" of the practice of sedation. However, the Claeys-Leonetti law exacerbates differences of opinion between palliative caregivers on sedation and questions the interest of this law for society and palliative care practices. clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04016038.

Keywords: interviews; palliative care; professionals; qualitative study; sedation.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

© Margaux Vieille et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

References

    1. Cherny NI, Portenoy RK: Sedation in the management of refractory symptoms: Guidelines for evaluation and treatment. J Palliat Care 1994;10:31–38
    1. van Dooren S, vanVeluw HT, van Zuylen L, et al. :. Exploration of concerns of relatives during continuous palliative sedation of their family members with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:452–459
    1. Quill TE, Byock IR: Responding to intractable terminal suffering: The role of terminal sedation and voluntary refusal of food and fluids. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:408–414
    1. Sedation for terminal distress and in specific and complex situations: Recommendations in adults and specificities at home and in geriatrics. Société française d'accompagnement et de soins palliatifs (SFAP). 2014. (Last accessed September5, 2020)
    1. Booker R, Bruce A: Palliative sedation and medical assistance in dying: Distinctly different or simply semantics? Nurs Inq 2020;27:e12321.
    1. Maeda I, Morita T, Yamaguchi T, et al. :. Effect of continuous deep sedation on survival in patients with advanced cancer (J-Proval): A propensity score-weighted analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:115–122
    1. Raus K, Chambaere K, Sterckx S: Controversies surrounding continuous deep sedation at the end of life: The parliamentary and societal debates in France. BMC Med Ethics 2016;17:36.
    1. Seymour J, Rietjens J, Bruinsma S, et al. : UNBIASED consortium: Using continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: A qualitative interview study of physicians' and nurses' practice in three European countries. Palliat Med 2015;29:48–59
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL: Time for Dying. Chicago: Aldine, 1980
    1. Robijn L, Chambaere K, Raus K, et al. : Reasons for continuous sedation until death in cancer patients: A qualitative interview study. Eur J Cancer Care 2017;26:e12405
    1. Blondeau D, Dumont S, Roy L, Martineau I: Attitudes of Quebec doctors toward sedation at the end of life: An exploratory study. Palliat Support Care 2009;7:331–337
    1. De Vries K, Plaskota M: Ethical dilemmas faced by hospice nurses when administering palliative sedation to patients with terminal cancer. Palliat Support Care 2017;15:148–157
    1. Sercu M, Pype P, Christiaens T, et al. :. Belgian general practitioners' perspectives on the use of palliative sedation in end-of-life home care: A qualitative study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;47:1054–1063
    1. Leboul D: Sedation in palliative care. Opportunity to think about the ethics of a clinic of uncertainty? In: Jacquemin D (ed): Sedation, Euthanasia: Ethics and Spirituality for Thinking. Namur, Paris: Lumen vitae, Collection Trajectoires n°30, éditions jésuites, 2017, pp. 199–217
    1. Dany L, Baumstarck K, Dudoit E, et al. : Determinants of favourable opinions about euthanasia in a sample of French physicians. BMC Palliat Care 2015;14:59.
    1. Peretti-Watel P, Bendiane MK, Moatti JP: Attitudes toward palliative care, conceptions of euthanasia and opinions about its legalization among French physicians. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1781–1793
    1. Swart SJ, van der Heide A, van Zuylen L, et al. :. Continuous palliative sedation: Not only a response to physical suffering. J Palliat Med 2014;17:27–36
    1. Claessens P, Menten J, Schotsmans P, Broeckaert B: Palliative sedation: A review of the research literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 2008;36:310–333
    1. Loi n° 2005-370 du 22 avril 2005 relative aux droits des malades et à la fin de vie. (Last accessed April15, 2019)
    1. Loi n° 2016-87 du 2 février 2016 créant de nouveaux droits en faveur des malades et des personnes en fin de vie. (Last accessed April15, 2019)
    1. Horn R: The “French exception”: The right to continuous deep sedation at the end of life. J Med Ethics 2018;44:204–205
    1. Ziegler S, Merker H, Schmid M, Puhan MA: The impact of the inpatient practice of continuous deep sedation until death on health care professionals' emotional well-being: A systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2017;16:30.
    1. Raus K, Brown J, Seale C, et al. : Continuous sedation until death: The everyday moral reasoning of physicians, nurses and family caregivers in the UK, The Netherlands and Belgium. BMC Med Ethics 2014;15:14.
    1. Swart SJ, van der Heide A, van Zuylen L, et al. :. Considerations of physicians about the depth of palliative sedation at the end of life. CMAJ 2012;184:E360–E366
    1. Abarshi EA, Papavasiliou ES, Preston N, et al. :. The complexity of nurses' attitudes and practice of sedation at the end of life: A systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;47:915–925.e11
    1. Bauer MW: Classical content analysis: A review. In: Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A pratical Handbook. London: SAGE, 2000, pp. 131–151.
    1. Flick U: Thematic coding and content analysis. In: An Introduction to Qualiative Research. London: SAGE, 2014, pp. 420–438.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–357
    1. Castra M: Dying Well: Sociology of Palliative Care. Paris: PUF, 2003

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner