Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the 2- and 3-direct-acting antiviral combination of AL-335, odalasvir, and simeprevir in healthy subjects

Thomas N Kakuda, Matthew W McClure, Christopher Westland, Jennifer Vuong, Marie-Claude Homery, Gwendoline Poizat, Laure Viguerie, Caroline Denot, Alain Patat, Qingling Zhang, James Hui, David Apelian, David B Smith, Sushmita M Chanda, John Fry, Thomas N Kakuda, Matthew W McClure, Christopher Westland, Jennifer Vuong, Marie-Claude Homery, Gwendoline Poizat, Laure Viguerie, Caroline Denot, Alain Patat, Qingling Zhang, James Hui, David Apelian, David B Smith, Sushmita M Chanda, John Fry

Abstract

This Phase I, open-label, two-group, fixed-sequence study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of AL-335, odalasvir, and simeprevir in healthy subjects. Group 1 (n=16) received AL-335 800 mg once daily (QD) (days 1-3, 11-13, and 21-23), simeprevir 150 mg QD (days 4-23), and odalasvir 150 mg (day 14) followed by 50 mg QD (days 15-23). Group 2 (n=16) received the same AL-335 regimen as in Group 1 plus odalasvir 150 mg (day 4) followed by 50 mg QD (days 5-23) and simeprevir 150 mg QD (days 14-23). Blood samples were collected to determine plasma concentrations of AL-335 (prodrug) and its metabolites, ALS-022399 (monophosphate precursor) and ALS-022227 (parent nucleoside), odalasvir, and simeprevir. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled. Odalasvir and simeprevir given alone, or in combination, increased AL-335 area under plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC 0-24 h) 3-, 4-, and 7- to 8-fold, respectively; ALS-022399 AUC 0-24 h increased 2-, 2-, and 3-fold, respectively. Simeprevir had no effect on ALS-022227 AUC 0-24 h, whereas odalasvir with/without simeprevir increased ALS-022227 AUC 0-24 h 1.5-fold. AL-335 had no effect on odalasvir or simeprevir pharmacokinetics. Odalasvir and simeprevir AUC 0-24 h increased 1.5- to 2-fold for both drugs when coadministered irrespective of AL-335 coadministration. Study medications were well tolerated with no serious adverse events. One subject prematurely discontinued study drugs (unrelated event). This study defined the preliminary pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of the combination of AL-335, odalasvir, and simeprevir in healthy subjects. These data support the further evaluation of this combination for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02512562.

Keywords: AL‐335; drug safety; drug‐drug interactions; hepatitis C virus; odalasvir; pharmacokinetics; simeprevir.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. PK pharmacokinetics
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subject disposition. PK pharmacokinetic; QD once daily; TEAE treatment‐emergent adverse event. aRisk of interaction between treatment for tooth abscess and study drugs. bThe subject that withdrew from the study on day 2, for reasons not related to the study, received two QD administrations of AL‐335 800 mg alone (day 1 and day 2) before any PK samples were taken and was therefore excluded from the PK analysis
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (±SD ) plasma concentration‐time curve of (A) AL‐335; (B) ALS‐022399; (C) ALS‐022227; (D) simeprevir; and (E) odalasvir by groupa. ODV, odalasvir; QD, once daily; SMV, simeprevir. aGroup 1 received SMV 150 mg QD on days 4‐23, ODV 150 mg (loading dose) on day 14, ODV 50 mg QD on days 15‐23, and AL‐335 800 mg QD on days 1‐3, 11‐13, and 21‐23. Group 2 received ODV 150 mg (loading dose) on day 4, ODV 50 mg QD on days 5‐23, SMV 150 mg QD on days 14‐23, and AL‐335 800 mg QD on days 1‐3, 11‐13, and 21‐23

References

    1. World Health Organization . Hepatitis C fact sheet. 2017. . (accessed 10 October 2017).
    1. Burstow NJ, Mohamed Z, Gomaa AI, et al. Hepatitis C treatment: Where are we now? Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:39‐52.
    1. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases . HCV Guidance: Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating Hepatitis C. 2017. . (Accessed 9 October 2017)
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver . EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2016. J Hepatol. 2017;66:153‐194.
    1. Gane EJ, Pianko S, Roberts SK, et al. Safety and efficacy of an 8‐week regimen of grazoprevir plus ruzasvir plus uprifosbuvir compared with grazoprevir plus elbasvir plus uprifosbuvir in participants without cirrhosis infected with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1, 2, or 3 (C‐CREST‐1 and C‐CREST‐2, part A): Two randomised, phase 2, open‐label trials. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:805‐813.
    1. Bourlière M, Gordon SC, Flamm SL, et al. Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir for previously treated HCV infection. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2134‐2146.
    1. Jacobson IM, Lawitz E, Gane EJ, et al. Efficacy of 8 weeks of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir in patients with chronic HCV infection: 2 phase 3 randomized trials. Gastroenterol. 2017;153:113‐122.
    1. Kohli A, Osinusi A, Sims Z, et al. Virological response after 6 week triple‐drug regimens for hepatitis C: A proof‐of‐concept phase 2A cohort study. Lancet. 2015;385:1107‐1113.
    1. Lawitz E, Poordad F, Gutierrez JA, et al. Short‐duration treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C: A randomized trial. Hepatology. 2017;65:439‐450.
    1. Wyles D, Wedemeyer H, Ben‐Ari Z, et al. Grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir for HCV after NS5A treatment failure. Hepatology. 2017;66:1794‐1804.
    1. Welzel TM, Asselah T, Dumas EO, et al. Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir plus dasabuvir for 8 weeks in previously untreated patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection without cirrhosis (GARNET): A single‐arm, open‐label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:494‐500.
    1. Zeuzem S, Foster GR, Wang S, et al. Glecaprevir‐Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in HCV Genotype 1 or 3 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:354‐369.
    1. Petersen T, Townsend K, Gordon LA, et al. High adherence to all‐oral directly acting antiviral HCV therapy among an inner‐city patient population in a phase 2a study. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:310‐319.
    1. Sbarigia U, Wirth D, Van Nuys K, et al. Economic study of the value of expanding HCV treatment capacity in Germany. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017;4:e000130.
    1. Ouwerkerk‐Mahadevan S, Snoeys J, Peeters M, Beumont‐Mauviel M, Simion A. Drug‐drug interactions with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor simeprevir. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:197‐208.
    1. Berliba E, Tsertsvadze T, Ghicavii N, et al. AL‐335, a once‐daily pangenotypic nucleotide HCV polymerase inhibitor, demonstrates potent antiviral activity over 7 days in treatment‐naïve genotype 1‐4 patients. J Hepatol. 2016;64(Suppl 2):S404‐S405.
    1. Chan J, Chung RT. Perspectives on HCV: Current therapeutic regimens and drug–drug interactions. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6:147‐163.
    1. Talavera PS, Boyer A, Lamblin G, et al. Managing drug‐drug interactions with new direct‐acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:269‐293.
    1. Alexander SP, Fabbro D, Kelly E, et al. The Concise Guide to Pharmacology 2017/18: Enzymes. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(Suppl 1):S272‐S359.
    1. Gane E, Schwabe C, Mader M, et al. Sustained virologic response after ACH‐3102 and sofosbuvir treatment for 8 or 6 weeks: A phase 2 “proxy” study. J Hepatol. 2015;62(Suppl 2):S266.
    1. Thakkar N, Slizgi JR, Brouwer KLR. Effect of liver disease on hepatic transporter expression and function. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:2282‐2294.
    1. Gane E, Stedman C, McClure M, et al. Short duration treatment with AL‐335 and odalasvir, with or without simeprevir, in treatment naïve patients with hepatitis C infection with or without cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2017;66(Suppl 1):S82.
    1. Zeuzem S, Bourgeois S, Greenbloom S, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of JNJ‐4178 (AL‐335, odalasvir, and simeprevir) in hepatitis C virus‐infected patients without cirrhosis: The Phase IIb OMEGA‐1 study. Hepatology. 2017;66(Suppl 1):38A.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner