Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation

Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian, Anayda Portela, Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian, Anayda Portela

Abstract

Background: Two recent recommendations made by the World Health Organization confirm the benefits of companion of choice at birth on labour outcomes; however institutional practices and policies do not always support its implementation in different settings around the world. We conducted a review to determine factors that affect implementation of this intervention considering the perspectives and experiences of different stakeholders and other institutional, systemic barriers and facilitators.

Methods: Forty one published studies were included in this review. Thirty one publications were identified from a 2013 Cochrane review on the effectiveness of companion of choice at birth. We also reviewed 10 qualitative studies conducted alongside the trials or other interventions on labour and birth companionship identified through electronic searches. The SURE (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence) framework was used to guide the thematic analysis of implementation factors.

Results: Women and their families expressed appreciation for the continuous presence of a person to provide support during childbirth. Health care providers were concerned about the role of the companion and possible interference with activities in the labour ward. Allocation of resources, organization of care, facility-related constraints and cultural inclinations were identified as implementation barriers.

Conclusion: Prior to introducing companion of choice at birth, understanding providers' attitudes and sensitizing them to the evidence is necessary. The commitment of the management of health care facilities is also required to change policies, including allocation of appropriate physical space that respects women's privacy. Implementation research to develop models for different contexts which could be scaled up would be useful, including documentation of factors that affected implementation and how they were addressed. Future research should also focus on documenting the costs related to implementation, and on measuring the impact of companion of choice at birth on care-seeking behavior for subsequent births.

Keywords: Companion of choice at birth; Continuous support during childbirth; Doula; Implementation; Labour companionship; Lay companion.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyer GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003766.
    1. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. ().
    1. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. ().
    1. Tuncalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Bahl R, Daelmans B, Mathai M, Say L, Kristensen F, Temmerman M, Bustreo F. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122:1045–1049. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451.
    1. Kopplin E, Torres-Pereyra J, Pena V, Salinas R. Impact of psychosocial supports during childbirth: the decrease of caesarean and bonuses of the process. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:834.
    1. Dickinson J, Paech M, McDonald SJ, Evans SF. The impact of intrapartum analgesia on labor and delivery outcomes in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42:65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00065.x.
    1. Dickinson J, Paech M, McDonald SJ, Evans SF. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and intrapartum analgesia in nulliparous labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43:463–468. doi: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00152.x.
    1. Gagnon AJ, Waghon K, Covell C. A randomized trial of one-to-one nurse support of women in labor. Birth. 1997;24:71–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00344.x.
    1. Gagnon AJ, Waghorn K. One-to-one nurse labor support of nulliparous women stimulated with oxytocin. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1999;28:371–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb02005.x.
    1. Breart G, Mlika-Cabane N, Thornton J, Trakas D, Alexander S. European trials on artificial rupture of membranes and professional support during labour. J Perinat Med. 1992;20:37.
    1. Hodnett ED, Osborn RW. Effects of continuous intrapartum professional support on childbirth outcomes. Res Nurs Health. 1989;12:289–297. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770120504.
    1. Klaus MH, Kennell JH, Robertson SS, Sosa R. Effects of social support during parturition on maternal and infant morbidity. Br Med J. 1986;293:585–587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585.
    1. Hemminki E, Virta A, Koponen P, Malin M, Kojo-Austin H, Tuimala R. A trial on continuous human support during labor: feasibility, interventions and mothers’ satisfaction. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;11:239–250. doi: 10.3109/01674829009084420.
    1. McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008;35(2):92–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x.
    1. Hodnett ED, Lowe NK, Hannah ME, Willan AR, Stevens B, Weston JA, et al. Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in north American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:1373–1381. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1373.
    1. Madi BC, Sandall J, Bennett R, MacLeod C. Effects of female relative support in labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 1999;26:4–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00004.x.
    1. Hofmeyr JG, Nikodem VC, Wolman WL, Chalmers BE, Kramer T. Companionship to modify the clinical birth environment: effects on progress and perceptions of labour, and breastfeeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:756–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13479.x.
    1. Kennell J, Klaus M, McGrath S, Robertson S, Hinkley C. Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1991;265:2197–2201. doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03460170051032.
    1. Morhason-Bello IO, Adedokun BO, Ojengbede OA, Olayemi O, Oladokun A, Fabamwo AO. Assessment of the effect of psychosocial support during childbirth in Ibadan, south-west Nigeria: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:145–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00983.x.
    1. Cogan R, Spinnato JA. Social support during premature labor: effects on labor and the newborn. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;8:209–216. doi: 10.3109/01674828809016789.
    1. Bruggemann OM, Parpinelli MA, Osis MJ, Cecatti JG, Neto ASC. Support to woman by a companion of her choice during childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2007;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-4-5.
    1. Campbell DA, Lake MF, Falk M, Backstrand JR. A randomized control trial of continuous support in labor by a lay doula. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:456–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00067.x.
    1. Campbell D, Scott K, Klaus M, Falk M. Female relatives or friends trained as labor doulas: outcomes at 6 to 8 weeks postpartum. Birth. 2007;34:220–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00174.x.
    1. Langer A, Campero L, Garcia C, Reynoso S. Effects of psychosocial support during labor and childbirth on breastfeeding, medical intervention, and mothers’ wellbeing in a Mexican public hospital;: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:1056–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09936.x.
    1. Yuenyong S, O'Brien B, Jirapeet V. Effects of labor support from close female relative on labor and maternal satisfaction in a Thai setting. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41:45–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01311.x.
    1. Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi MM. Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;109:198–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028.
    1. Brown H, Hofmeyr GJ, Nikodem VC, Smith H, Garner P. Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study. BMC Med. 2007;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-7.
    1. Gordon NP, Walton D, McAdam E, Derman J, Gallitero G, Garrett L. Effects of providing hospital-based doulas in health maintenance organization hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:422–426.
    1. Lindow SW, Hendricks MW, Thompson JW, van der Spuy ZM. The effect of emotional support on maternal oxytocin levels in laboring women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;79:127–129. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00073-6.
    1. McGrath S, Kennell J, Suresh M, Moise K, Hinkley C. Doula support vs epidural analgesia: impact on cesarean rates. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:16A. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199904020-00101.
    1. Manning OG. A birth intervention: the therapeutic effects of doula support versus Lamaze preparation on first-time mothers’ working models of caregiving. Alternative Therapies in Medicine. 1998;4:73–81. doi: 10.1089/act.1998.4.73.
    1. Scott KD, Klaus PH, Klaus MH. The obstetrical and postpartum benefits of continuous support during childbirth. J Women’s Health Gen based Med. 1999;8:1257–1264. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.1257.
    1. Sosa R, Kennell JH, Klaus MH, Robertson S, Urrutia J. The effect of a supportive companion on perinatal problems, length of labor and mother-infant interaction. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:597–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198009113031101.
    1. Trueba G, Contreras C, Velazo MT, Lara EG, Martinez HB. Alternative strategy to decrease cesarean section: support by doulas during labor. J Perinat Educ. 2000;9:8–13. doi: 10.1624/105812400X87608.
    1. Tryon PA. Use of comfort measures as support during labor. Nurs Res. 1966;15:109–118. doi: 10.1097/00006199-196601520-00003.
    1. Thomassen P, Lundwall M, Wiger E, Wollin L, Uvnas-Moberg K. Doula- a new concept in obstetrics. Lakartidningen. 2003;100:4268–4271.
    1. El-Nemer A, Down S, Small N. “she would help me form the hear”: an ethnography of Egyptian women in labour. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.016.
    1. Kumbani L, Biune G, Chirwa E, Malata A, Oyvind OJ. Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: a qualitative study of women’s perceptions of perinatal care from rural southern Malawi. Reprod Health. 2013;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-9.
    1. Maimbolwa MC, Sikazwe N, Yamba B. Views on involving a social support person during labor in Zambian maternities. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2001;46:226–234. doi: 10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00134-9.
    1. Mosallam M, Rizk D, Thomas L, Eximakhai M. Women’s attitudes towards psychosocial support in labour in United Arab Emirates. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;269:181–187. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0448-7.
    1. Campero L, Garcia C, Diaz C, Ortiz O, Reynoso S, Langer A. “alone, I wouldn’t have known what to do”: a qualitative study on social support during labor and delivery in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:395–403. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00077-X.
    1. Al-Mandeel HM, Almufleh AS, Al Damri AJ, Al-Bassam DA, Hajr EA, Bedawaiwi NA, Alshehri SM. Saudi women’s acceptance and attitudes towards companion support during labor: should we implement an antenatal awareness program? Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33:28–33. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.28.
    1. Kabakian-Khasholian T, El Nemer A, Bashour H. Perceptions about labor companionship at public teaching hospitals in three Arab countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;129:223–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.12.005.
    1. Qian X, Smith H, Zhou L, Liang J, Garner P. Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: an observational study to explore clinical practice, women’s preferences and provider’s views. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2001;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-1-1.
    1. Alexander A, Mustafa A, Emil SAV, Amekah E, Engmann C, Adanu R, Moyer CA. Social support during delivery in rural central Ghana: a mixed methods study of women’s preferences for and against inclusion of a lay companion in the delivery room. J Biosoc Sci. 2014;46:669–685. doi: 10.1017/S0021932013000412.
    1. Banda G, Kafulafula G, Nyirenda E, Taulo F, Kalilani L. Acceptability and experience of supportive companionship during childbirth in Malawi. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;117:937–945. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02574.x.
    1. The SURE Collaboration. SURE guides for preparing and using evidence-based policy briefs: identifying and addressing barriers to implementing policy options. 2011. Version 2.1. ().
    1. Davis Harte J, Sheehan A, Stewart S, Foureur M. Childbirth supporters’ experiences in a built hospital birth environment: exploring inhibiting and facilitating factors in negotiating the supporter role. Health Environment Research & Design Journal. 2016;9:135–161. doi: 10.1177/1937586715622006.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner