Reassessment of the risk of birth defects due to Zika virus in Guadeloupe, 2016

Anna L Funk, Bruno Hoen, Ingrid Vingdassalom, Catherine Ryan, Philippe Kadhel, Kinda Schepers, Stanie Gaete, Benoit Tressières, Arnaud Fontanet, Anna L Funk, Bruno Hoen, Ingrid Vingdassalom, Catherine Ryan, Philippe Kadhel, Kinda Schepers, Stanie Gaete, Benoit Tressières, Arnaud Fontanet

Abstract

Background: In the French Territories in the Americas (FTA), the risk of birth defects possibly associated with Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was 7.0% (95%CI: 5.0 to 9.5) among foetuses/infants of 546 women with symptomatic RT-PCR confirmed ZIKV infection during pregnancy. Many of these defects were isolated measurement-based microcephaly (i.e. without any detected brain or clinical abnormalities) or mild neurological conditions. We wanted to estimate the proportion of such minor findings among live births of women who were pregnant in the same region during the outbreak period but who were not infected with ZIKV.

Methods: In Guadeloupe, pregnant women were recruited at the time of delivery and tested for ZIKV infection. The outcomes of live born infants of ZIKV non-infected women were compared to those of ZIKV-exposed live born infants in Guadeloupe, extracted from the FTA prospective cohort.

Results: Of 490 live born infants without exposure to ZIKV, 42 infants (8.6%, 95%CI: 6.2-11.4) had mild abnormalities that have been described as 'potentially linked to ZIKV infection'; all but one of these was isolated measurement-based microcephaly. Among the 241 live born infants with ZIKV exposure, the proportion of such abnormalities, using the same definition, was similar (6.6%, 95%CI: 3.8-10.6).

Conclusions: Isolated anthropometric abnormalities and mild neurological conditions were as prevalent among infants with and without in-utero ZIKV exposure. If such abnormalities had not been considered as 'potentially linked to ZIKV' in the original prospective cohort in Guadeloupe, the overall estimate of the risk of birth defects considered due to the virus would have been significantly lower, at approximately 1.6% (95% CI: 0.4-4.1).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02916732).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow chart of inclusion of…
Fig 1. Flow chart of inclusion of ZIKV un-exposed and exposed pregnant women for inclusion of live births in this analysis, Guadeloupe, 2016.

References

    1. Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo ASO, Sampaio SA, de Filippis I, Fabri A, et al.. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16(6):653–60. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00095-5
    1. Cordeiro MT, Pena LJ, Brito CA, Gil LH, Marques ET. Positive IgM for Zika virus in the cerebrospinal fluid of 30 neonates with microcephaly in Brazil. Lancet 2016; 387(10030): 1811–2.
    1. de Araujo TVB, de Alencar Ximenes RA, de Barros Miranda-Filho D, Valongueiro S, de Albuquerque MFPM, Braga C, et al.. Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18(3): 328–36. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30727-2
    1. Krow-Lucal ER, de Andrade MR, Cananéa JNA, Moore CA, Leite PL, Biggerstaff BJ, et al.. Association and birth prevalence of microcephaly attributable to Zika virus infection among infants in Paraíba, Brazil, in 2015–16: a case-control study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2(3): 205–13 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30020-8
    1. Santa Rita TH, Barra RB, Peixoto GP, Mesquita PG, Barra GB. Association between suspected Zika virus disease during pregnancy and giving birth to a newborn with congenital microcephaly: a matched case-control study. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10(1): 457. 10.1186/s13104-017-2796-1
    1. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, da Fonseca EB, et al.. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171(3): 288–95 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982
    1. Dias JRO, Ventura CV, Freitas BP, Prazeres J, Ventura LO, Bravo-Filho V et al.. Ocular abnormalities in congenital Zika syndrome: are the ophthalmoscopic findings "the top of the iceberg"? Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.004
    1. Oliveira-Filho J, Felzemburgh R, Costa F, Nery N, Mattos A, Henriques DF, et al.. Seizures as a Complication of Congenital Zika Syndrome in Early Infancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018; 98(6): 1860–62 10.4269/ajtmh.17-1020
    1. Wheeler AC. Development of Infants With Congenital Zika Syndrome: What Do We Know and What Can We Expect? Pediatrics 2018; 141(Suppl 2): S154–S60. 10.1542/peds.2017-2038D
    1. Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Nogueira RMR, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al.. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(24):2321–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412
    1. Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Rice ME, Galang RR, Fulton AC, VanMaldeghem K, Prado MV, et al.. Pregnancy Outcomes After Maternal Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy—U.S. Territories, January 1, 2016-April 25, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017; 66(23): 615–21. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6623e1
    1. Hoen B, Schaub B, Funk AL, Ardillon V, Boullard M, Cabié A, et al.. Pregnancy Outcomes after ZIKV Infection in French Territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(11): 985–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709481
    1. Pomar L, Vouga M, Lambert V, Pomar C, Hcini N, Jolivet A et al.. Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana. BMJ 2018; 363:k4431 10.1136/bmj.k4431
    1. Pomar L, Malinger G, Benoist G, Carles G, Ville Y, Rousset D, et al.. Association between Zika virus and fetopathy: a prospective cohort study in French Guiana. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49(6): 729–36. 10.1002/uog.17404
    1. Adhikari EH, Nelson DB, Johnson KA, Jacobs S, Rogers VL, Roberts SW, et al.. Infant outcomes among women with Zika virus infection during pregnancy: results of a large prenatal Zika screening program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216(3): 292.e1–292.e8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.018
    1. Villar J, Papageorghiou AT, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Ismail LC, Barros FC, et al.. The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2(10): 781–92. 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70121-4
    1. Rice ME, Galang RR, Roth NM, Ellington SR, Moore CA, Valencia-Prado M, et al.. Vital Signs: Zika-Associated Birth Defects and Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities Possibly Associated with Congenital Zika Virus Infection—U.S. Territories and Freely Associated States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(31):858–67. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6731e1
    1. Delaney A, Mai C, Smoots A, Cragan J, Ellington S, Langlois P, et al.. Population-Based Surveillance of Birth Defects Potentially Related to Zika Virus Infection—15 States and U.S. Territories, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(3):91–6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6703a2
    1. Orioli IM, Dolk H, Lopez-Camelo JS, Mattos D, Poletta FA, Dutra MG, et al.. Prevalence and clinical profile of microcephaly in South America pre-Zika, 2005–14: prevalence and case-control study. BMJ 2017; 359: j5018. 10.1136/bmj.j5018
    1. Morris JK, Rankin J, Garne E, Loane M, Greenlees R, Addor MC, et al.. Prevalence of microcephaly in Europe: population based study. BMJ 2016; 354: i4721. 10.1136/bmj.i4721
    1. Pasquier C, Joguet G, Mengelle C, Chapuy-Regaud S, Pavili L, Prisant N, et al.. Kinetics of anti-ZIKV antibodies after Zika infection using two commercial enzyme-linked immunoassays. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 90(1): 26–30 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.09.001
    1. Barzon L, Percivalle E, Pacenti M, Rovida F, Zavattoni M, Del Bravo P, et al.. Virus and Antibody Dynamics in Travelers With Acute Zika Virus Infection. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66(8): 1173–80. 10.1093/cid/cix967
    1. Matheus S, Tall C, Labeau B, de Laval F, Briolant S, Berthelot L, et al.., Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25 (6): 1153–1160 10.3201/eid2506.180361
    1. Hoen B, Carpentier M, Gaete S, Tressières B, Herrmann-Storck C, Vingadassalom I, et al.. Kinetics of anti-Zika virus antibodies after acute infection in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57(11):e01151–19. 10.1128/JCM.01151-19
    1. Euroimmun. Euroimmun test systems for the diagnosis of Zika virus infections. Available online at:
    1. Dommergues M, Mandelbrot L, Mahieu Caputo D, Boudjema N, Durand Zaleski I, ICI Group Club de médecine foetale. Termination of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis in France: how severe are the foetal anomalies? Prenat Diagn. 2010; 30(6): 531–9. 10.1002/pd.2510
    1. Garne E, Khoshnood B, Loane M, Boyd PA, Dolk H, EUROCAT Working Group. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly after 23 weeks of gestation: a European register-based study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2010;117(6):660–6.
    1. Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization. French Guiana, Guadeloupe, and Martinique. Health in the Americas 2007: Volume II–Countries: 344–360. Available online at:
    1. Bérard A, Abbas-Chorfa F, Kassai B, Vial T, Nguyen KA, Sheehy O, Schott AM. The French Pregnancy Cohort: Medication use during pregnancy in the French population. PloS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219095. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219095
    1. Carvalho MS, Freitas LP, Cruz OG, Brasil P, Bastos LS. Association of past dengue fever epidemics with the risk of Zika microcephaly at the population level in Brazil. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1–9. 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4
    1. Campos MC, Dombrowski JG, Phelan J, Marinho CR, Hibberd M, Clark TG, Campino S. Zika might not be acting alone: Using an ecological study approach to investigate potential co-acting risk factors for an unusual pattern of microcephaly in Brazil. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201452. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201452
    1. de Souza WV, Vazquez E, Bezerra LC, Mendes AD, Lyra TM, de Araujo TV, et al.. Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):130. 10.1186/s12889-018-5039-z
    1. Albert PS, Grantz KL. Fetal growth and ethnic variation. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2(10): 773 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70186-X
    1. Liu S, Metcalfe A, Leon JA, Sauve R, Kramer MS, Joseph KS. Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada. PLoS One 2017; 12(3): e0172910. 10.1371/journal.pone.0172910
    1. Cheng YK, Leung TY, Lao TT, Chan YM, Sahota DS. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21st standard. BJOG 2016; 123(Suppl 3): 48–55
    1. Silva AA, Barbieri MA, Alves MT, Carvalho CA, Batista RF, Ribeiro MR, et al.. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Microcephaly at Birth in Brazil in 2010. Pediatrics. 2018;141(2): e20170589 10.1542/peds.2017-0589
    1. Ades AE, Soriano-Arandes A, Alarcon A, Bonfante F, Thorne C, Peckham CS, Giaquinto C. Vertical transmission of Zika virus and its outcomes: a Bayesian synthesis of prospective studies. Lancet Infect Dis. S1473-3099(20)30432-1 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30432-1
    1. Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, Boppana SB, Gupta RK. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26(1): 86–102 10.1128/CMR.00062-12
    1. De Santis M, Cavaliere AF, Straface G, Caruso A. Rubella infection in pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2006; 21(4): 390–8 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.01.014

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner