Monitoring gastric cancer progression with circulating tumour DNA

T Hamakawa, Y Kukita, Y Kurokawa, Y Miyazaki, T Takahashi, M Yamasaki, H Miyata, K Nakajima, K Taniguchi, S Takiguchi, M Mori, Y Doki, K Kato, T Hamakawa, Y Kukita, Y Kurokawa, Y Miyazaki, T Takahashi, M Yamasaki, H Miyata, K Nakajima, K Taniguchi, S Takiguchi, M Mori, Y Doki, K Kato

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging candidate biomarker for malignancies and may be useful for monitoring the disease status of gastric cancer.

Methods: We performed targeted deep sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by massively parallel sequencing in patients with tumours harbouring TP53 mutations. The quantitative values of TP53-ctDNA during the clinical course were compared with the tumour status.

Results: Three out of ten patients with TP53 mutations in primary tumours showed detectable TP53 mutation levels in preoperative cfDNA. Although the cfDNA concentrations were not always reflective of the disease course, the ctDNA fraction correlated with the disease status.

Conclusions: ctDNA may serve as a useful biomarker to monitor gastric cancer progression and residual disease.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of cell-free DNA and ctDNA with regard to treatment response. The levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA; grey bar) and ctDNA (line graph) at various time points in patients 4 (A), 5 (B), and 8 (C) are displayed. The vertical axis on the left represents the concentration of cfDNA, and the vertical axis on the right represents the TP53-mutant fraction in cfDNA. The horizontal axis labels represent the time points of plasma sampling and tumour status (in parenthesis). The presence or absence of tumour after surgery is described by the R status (R0: no residual tumour, R1: microscopic residual tumour, R2: macroscopic residual tumour). Abbreviations: POD: postoperative day; PD: progressive disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between ctDNA and clinical observations during the treatment course. ctDNA values during the clinical course are depicted in comparison with serum tumour markers, treatment, response, and tumour burden (specimen photos and radiological images). The horizontal arrows indicate the time scale for each case. The day of gastrectomy is represented by the vertical line. The presence or absence of tumour after surgery is described by the R status (R0: no residual tumour, R1: microscopic residual tumour, R2: macroscopic residual tumour). The intervals from surgery are indicated inside the arrows. Chemotherapy is depicted by colour bars under the time scale. The specimen photos depict the resected stomach, representing the tumour burden before surgery. CT (A, B, and C) and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT (A) images display the status of metastatic liver tumours at each assessment point, indicated by triangle markers. In each case, ctDNA is expressed as the percent relative to the ctDNA values before surgery. POD: postoperative day, PD: progressive disease, XP: capecitabine+cisplatin, Her: trastuzumab, CPT-11: irinotecan, w-PTX: weekly administration of paclitaxel. (A) The ctDNA fraction was measured for both TP53 (c.103delT) and PIK3CA (c.1633G>A). (B) The ctDNA fraction was measured for both TP53 (c.747G>C) and PIK3CA (c.1633G>A). (C) The ctDNA fraction was measured for both TP53 (c.155G>T) and FBXW7 (c.1177C>T).

References

    1. Dawson S-J, Tsui DWY, Murtaza M, Biggs H, Rueda OM, Chin S-F, Dunning MJ, Gale D, Forshew T, Mahler-Araujo B, Rajan S, Humphray S, Becq J, Halsall D, Wallis M, Bentley D, Caldas C, Rosenfeld N. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368 (13:1199–1209.
    1. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, Thornton K, Agrawal N, Sokoll L, Szabo SA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA., Jr Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008;14 (9:985–990.
    1. Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100 (15:8817–8822.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45 (2:228–247.
    1. Junemann S, Sedlazeck FJ, Prior K, Albersmeier A, John U, Kalinowski J, Mellmann A, Goesmann A, von Haeseler A, Stoye J, Harmsen D. Updating benchtop sequencing performance comparison. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31 (4:294–296.
    1. Kolesnikova EV, Tamkovich SN, Bryzgunova OE, Shelestyuk PI, Permyakova VI, Vlassov VV, Tuzikov AS, Laktionov PP, Rykova EY. Circulating DNA in the blood of gastric cancer patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1137:226–231.
    1. Kukita Y, Uchida J, Oba S, Nishino K, Kumagai T, Taniguchi K, Okuyama T, Imamura F, Kato K. Quantitative Identification of mutant alleles derived from lung cancer in plasma cell-free DNA via anomaly detection using deep sequencing data. PloS One. 2013;8 (11:e81468.
    1. Park JL, Kim HJ, Choi BY, Lee HC, Jang HR, Song KS, Noh SM, Kim SY, Han DS, Kim YS. Quantitative analysis of cell-free DNA in the plasma of gastric cancer patients. Oncol Lett. 2012;3 (4:921–926.
    1. Park KU, Lee HE, Park do J, Jung EJ, Song J, Kim HH, Choe G, Kim WH, Lee HS. MYC quantitation in cell-free plasma DNA by real-time PCR for gastric cancer diagnosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47 (5:530–536.
    1. Rago C, Huso DL, Diehl F, Karim B, Liu G, Papadopoulos N, Samuels Y, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Diaz Jr., LA Serial assessment of human tumor burdens in mice by the analysis of circulating DNA. Cancer Res. 2007;67 (19:9364–9370.
    1. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11 (6:426–437.
    1. Shimada H, Noie T, Ohashi M, Oba K, Takahashi Y. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer. 2013;17 (1:26–33.
    1. Tie J, Kinde I, Wang Y, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a marker of recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer (CC) J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 (suppl 5s:abstr 11015.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner