Effect of the Wingman-Connect Upstream Suicide Prevention Program for Air Force Personnel in Training: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Peter A Wyman, Anthony R Pisani, C Hendricks Brown, Bryan Yates, Lacy Morgan-DeVelder, Karen Schmeelk-Cone, Robert D Gibbons, Eric D Caine, Mariya Petrova, Tracy Neal-Walden, David J Linkh, Alicia Matteson, Jordan Simonson, Steven E Pflanz, Peter A Wyman, Anthony R Pisani, C Hendricks Brown, Bryan Yates, Lacy Morgan-DeVelder, Karen Schmeelk-Cone, Robert D Gibbons, Eric D Caine, Mariya Petrova, Tracy Neal-Walden, David J Linkh, Alicia Matteson, Jordan Simonson, Steven E Pflanz

Abstract

Importance: Suicide has been a leading manner of death for US Air Force personnel in recent years. Universal prevention programs that reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors in military populations have not been identified.

Objectives: To determine whether the Wingman-Connect program for Airmen-in-training reduces suicidal ideation, depression, and occupational problems compared with a stress management program and to test the underlying network health model positing that cohesive, healthy units are protective against suicidal ideation.

Design, setting, and participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2017 to October 2019 and compared classes of personnel followed up for 6 months. The setting was a US Air Force technical training school, with participants studied to their first base assignment, whether US or international. Participants in 216 classes were randomized, with an 84% retention rate. Data analysis was performed from November 2019 to May 2020.

Interventions: The Wingman-Connect program used group skill building for cohesion, shared purpose, and managing career and personal stressors (3 blocks of 2 hours each). Stress management training covered cognitive and behavioral strategies (2 hours). Both conditions had a 1-hour booster session, plus text messages.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were scores on the suicidal ideation and depression scales of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health and self-reports of military occupational impairment. Class network protective factors hypothesized to mediate the effect of Wingman-Connect were assessed with 4 measures: cohesion assessed perceptions that classmates cooperate, work well together, and support each other; morale was measured with a single item used in other studies with military samples; healthy class norms assessed perceptions of behaviors supported by classmates; and bonds to classmates were assessed by asking each participant to name classmates whom they respect and would choose to spend time with.

Results: A total of 215 classes including 1485 individuals (1222 men [82.3%]; mean [SD] age, 20.9 [3.1] years) participated; 748 individuals were enrolled in the Wingman-Connect program and 737 individuals were enrolled in the stress management program. At 1 month, the Wingman-Connect group reported lower suicidal ideation severity (effect size [ES], -0.23; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.09; P = .001) and depression symptoms (ES, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.08; P = .002) and fewer occupational problems (ES, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.02; P = .02). At 6 months, the Wingman-Connect group reported lower depression symptoms (ES, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.02; P = .03), whereas the difference in suicidal ideation severity was not significant (ES, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.29 to 0.01; P = .06). The number needed to treat to produce 1 fewer participant with elevated depression at either follow-up point was 21. The benefits of the training on occupational problems did not extend past 1 month. The Wingman-Connect program strengthened cohesive, healthy class units, which helped reduce suicidal ideation severity (estimate, -0.035; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; P = .02) and depression symptom scores (estimate, -0.039; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; P = .02) at 1 month.

Conclusions and relevance: Wingman-Connect is the first universal prevention program to reduce suicidal ideation and depression symptoms in a general Air Force population. Group training that builds cohesive, healthy military units is promising for upstream suicide prevention and may be essential for ecological validity. Extension of the program to the operational Air Force is recommended for maintaining continuity and testing the prevention impact on suicidal behavior.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04067401.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pisani reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health during the conduct of the study and speaking fees from SafeSide Prevention outside the submitted work. Dr Brown reported receiving grants from the Department of Defense and University of Rochester during the conduct of the study and personal fees from University of Chicago outside the submitted work. Dr Gibbons reported being an expert witness for the US Department of Justice, Merck, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, and Wyeth and being a founder of Adaptive Testing Technologies, which distributes the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health battery of adaptive tests; the terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flow of Technical Training Classes…
Figure 1.. Flow of Technical Training Classes and Airmen in the Wingman-Connect Trial
AFSC indicates Air Force Specialty Code.
Figure 2.. Wingman-Connect and Stress Management Group…
Figure 2.. Wingman-Connect and Stress Management Group Scores on Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health
Graphs show scores for suicidal ideation severity (A) and depression (B) over the 6-month study period. aP < .05 for Wingman-Connect vs stress management groups.

References

    1. Smolenski DJ, Reger MA, Alexander CL, et al. DoDSER: Department of Defense suicide event report—calendar year 2012 annual report. Published December 20, 2013. Accessed September 25, 2020.
    1. Pruitt LD, Smolenski DJ, Tucker J, et al. DoDSER: Department of Defense suicide event report—calendar year 2017 annual report. Published July 12, 2018. Accessed September 25, 2020.
    1. Hoge CW. Suicide reduction and research efforts in service members and veterans: sobering realities. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(5):464-466. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4564
    1. Ramchand R, Acosta J, Burns RM, Jaycox LH, Pernin CG. The war within: preventing suicide in the U.S. Military. Rand Health Q. 2011;1(1):2. doi:10.7249/RB9529
    1. Ursano RJ, Colpe LJ, Heeringa SG, Kessler RC, Schoenbaum M, Stein MB; Army STARRS collaborators . The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS). Psychiatry. 2014;77(2):107-119. doi:10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.107
    1. Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, et al. . Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in U.S. Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017;212:64-72. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028
    1. Comtois KA, Kerbrat AH, DeCou CR, et al. . Effect of augmenting standard care for military personnel with brief caring text messages for suicide prevention: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(5):474-483. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4530
    1. Rudd MD, Bryan CJ, Wertenberger EG, et al. . Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(5):441-449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843
    1. Stanley B, Brown GK, Brenner LA, et al. . Comparison of the safety planning intervention with follow-up vs usual care of suicidal patients treated in the emergency department. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(9):894-900. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776
    1. Wyman PA. Developmental approach to prevent adolescent suicides: research pathways to effective upstream preventive interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(3)(suppl 2):S251-S256. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.039
    1. Brown CH, Wyman PA, Brinales JM, Gibbons RD. The role of randomized trials in testing interventions for the prevention of youth suicide. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19(6):617-631. doi:10.1080/09540260701797779
    1. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14(1):32-38. doi:10.1093/ije/14.1.32
    1. US Department of Defense; Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Annual suicide report (ASR): calendar year 2018. Published 2019. Accessed September 25, 2020.
    1. Knox KL, Litts DA, Talcott GW, Feig JC, Caine ED. Risk of suicide and related adverse outcomes after exposure to a suicide prevention programme in the US Air Force: cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327(7428):1376-1378. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1376
    1. Adler AB, Bliese PD, Pickering MA, et al. . Mental skills training with basic combat training soldiers: a group-randomized trial. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(6):1752-1764. doi:10.1037/apl0000021
    1. Cacioppo JT, Adler AB, Lester PB, et al. . Building social resilience in soldiers: a double dissociative randomized controlled study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109(1):90-105. doi:10.1037/pspi0000022
    1. Cohn A, Pakenham K. Efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral program to improve psychological adjustment among soldiers in recruit training. Mil Med. 2008;173(12):1151-1157. doi:10.7205/MILMED.173.12.1151
    1. Williams A, Hagerty BM, Andrei AC, Yousha SM, Hirth RA, Hoyle KS. STARS: strategies to assist navy recruits’ success. Mil Med. 2007;172(9):942-949. doi:10.7205/MILMED.172.9.942
    1. Fikretoglu D, Liu A, Nazarov A, Blackler K. A group randomized control trial to test the efficacy of the Road to Mental Readiness (R2MR) program among Canadian military recruits. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):326. doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2287-0
    1. Jones N, Whelan C, Harden L, Macfarlane A, Burdett H, Greenberg N. Resilience-based intervention for UK military recruits: a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(2):90-96. doi:10.1136/oemed-2018-105503
    1. Wyman PA, Pickering TA, Pisani AR, et al. . Peer-adult network structure and suicide attempts in 38 high schools: implications for network-informed suicide prevention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019;60(10):1065-1075. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13102
    1. Wilcox HC, Kellam SG, Brown CH, et al. . The impact of two universal randomized first- and second-grade classroom interventions on young adult suicide ideation and attempts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;95(1)(suppl):S60-S73. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.005
    1. Joiner T. Why People Die by Suicide. Harvard University Press; 2005.
    1. Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, Braithwaite SR, Selby EA, Joiner TE Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575-600. doi:10.1037/a0018697
    1. Lakey B, Cronin A. Low social support and major depression: research, theory and methodological issues In: Dobson KS, Dozois DJA, eds. Risk Factors in Depression. Elsevier Academic Press; 2008:385-408. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-045078-0.00017-4
    1. Nock MK, Stein MB, Heeringa SG, et al. ; Army STARRS Collaborators . Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):514-522. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.30
    1. Ursano RJ, Kessler RC, Naifeh JA, et al. ; Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (STARRS) Collaborators . Risk of suicide attempt among soldiers in army units with a history of suicide attempts. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(9):924-931. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1925
    1. Mitchell MM, Gallaway MS, Millikan AM, Bell M. Interaction of combat exposure and unit cohesion in predicting suicide-related ideation among post-deployment soldiers. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012;42(5):486-494. doi:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00106.x
    1. Griffith J. Cross (unit)-level effects of cohesion on relationships of suicide thoughts to combat exposure, postdeployment stressors, and postdeployment social support. Behav Med. 2015;41(3):98-106. doi:10.1080/08964289.2014.987719
    1. Grudo G. Suicide leading cause of death for active duty Airmen. Air Force Magazine Published August 10, 2017. Accessed September 30, 2020.
    1. Institute of Medicine Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research. National Academies Press; 1994.
    1. Pruitt LD, Smolenski DJ, Bush NE, et al. . Suicide in the military: understanding rates and risk factors across the United States’ armed forces. Mil Med. 2019;184(1)(suppl):432-437. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy296
    1. Brown CH, Ten Have TR, Jo B, et al. . Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:1-25. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100223
    1. LoMurray M. Sources of Strength Facilitators Guide: Suicide Prevention Peer Gatekeeper Training. The North Dakota Suicide Prevention Project; 2005.
    1. Wyman PA, Brown CH, LoMurray M, et al. . An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1653-1661. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.190025
    1. Cross WF, Pisani AR, Schmeelk-Cone K, et al. . Measuring trainer fidelity in the transfer of suicide prevention training. Crisis. 2014;35(3):202-212. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000253
    1. Leahy RL. Cognitive Therapy Techniques: A Practitioner's Guide. 2nd ed Guildford Press; 2018.
    1. Gibbons RD, Weiss DJ, Pilkonis PA, et al. . Development of a computerized adaptive test for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(11):1104-1112. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.14
    1. Gibbons RD, Kupfer D, Frank E, Moore T, Beiser DG, Boudreaux ED. Development of a computerized adaptive test suicide scale: the CAT-SS. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(9):1376-1382. doi:10.4088/JCP.16m10922
    1. Achtyes ED, Halstead S, Smart L, et al. . Validation of computerized adaptive testing in an outpatient nonacademic setting: the VOCATIONS trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(10):1091-1096. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400390
    1. Graham AK, Minc A, Staab E, Beiser DG, Gibbons RD, Laiteerapong N. Validation of a computerized adaptive test for mental health in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):23-30. doi:10.1370/afm.2316
    1. Herrell RK, Edens EN, Riviere LA, Thomas JL, Bliese PD, Hoge CW. Assessing functional impairment in a working military population: the Walter Reed functional impairment scale. Psychol Serv. 2014;11(3):254-264. doi:10.1037/a0037347
    1. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB. An examination of the psychometric properties and nomological validity of some revised and reduced substitutes for leadership scales. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79(5):702-713. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.702
    1. Britt TW, Dickinson JM. Morale during military operations: a positive psychology approach In: Britt TW, Castro CA, Adler AB, eds. Military Performance: Military Life—The Psychology of Serving in Peace and Combat. Praeger Security International; 2006:157-184.
    1. Valente TW. Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods and Applications. Oxford University Press; 2010. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001
    1. Schmeelk-Cone K, Pisani AR, Petrova M, Wyman PA. Three scales assessing high school students’ attitudes and perceived norms about seeking adult help for distress and suicide concerns. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012;42(2):157-172. doi:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00079.x
    1. Gould MS, Velting D, Kleinman M, Lucas C, Thomas JG, Chung M. Teenagers’ attitudes about coping strategies and help-seeking behavior for suicidality. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43(9):1124-1133. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000132811.06547.31
    1. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi:10.1177/0164027504268574
    1. Gibbons RD, Weiss DJ, Pilkonis PA, et al. . Development of the CAT-ANX: a computerized adaptive test for anxiety. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(2):187-194. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13020178
    1. Forbes D, Alkemade N, Mitchell D, et al. . Utility of the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 (DAR-5) scale as a brief anger measure. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(2):166-173. doi:10.1002/da.22148
    1. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41-54. doi:10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
    1. Foran HM, Adler AB. Trainee perceptions of drill sergeant qualities during basic combat training. Mil Psychol. 2013;25(6):577-587. doi:10.1037/mil0000023
    1. Murray D. Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO MPlus user’s guide, version 8. Published 2019. Accessed September 25, 2020.
    1. R Project for Statistical Computing R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Published 2020. Accessed September 25, 2020.
    1. Kahan BC, Jairath V, Doré CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1):139. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-139
    1. Rosenthal R, Cooper H, Hedges L. Parametric measures of effect size In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation; 1994:231-244.
    1. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Brown CH, Wang W, Hoffman JM. The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit regression. Clin Trials. 2007;4(5):499-513. doi:10.1177/1740774507083434
    1. Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(3):209-233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
    1. Mackinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004;39(1):99-128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
    1. Brown CH, Brincks A, Huang S, et al. . Two-year impact of prevention programs on adolescent depression: An integrative data analysis approach. Prev Sci. 2018;19(1)(suppl):74-94. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0737-1
    1. Durkheim E. Suicide: A Sociological Study. The Free Press; 1897.
    1. Bearman PS. The social structure of suicide. Sociol Forum. 1991;6:501-524. doi:10.1007/BF01114474
    1. Bearman PS, Moody J. Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(1):89-95. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.1.89

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner