Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?

Jeremy Brown, Rita Fleming, Jamie Aristzabel, Rocksolana Gishta, Jeremy Brown, Rita Fleming, Jamie Aristzabel, Rocksolana Gishta

Abstract

Objective: Physicians are taught that the pelvic exam is a key part of the evaluation of a woman presenting with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. However, the exam is time consuming and invasive, and its use in the emergency department (ED) has not been prospectively evaluated. We evaluated how often the findings of the pelvic exam changed management in a cohort of consecutive female patients presenting with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding.

Methods: We enrolled women who required a pelvic exam together with the providers caring for them in an academic ED from September 2004 to August 2005. We collected the results of the general history and physical exam. The provider was asked to predict the findings of the pelvic exam, and these were compared with the actual findings of the exam.

Results: One hundred eighty-three patients were prospectively entered into the study. When compared with predicted findings, the pelvic exam was as expected in 131 patients (72%). In a further 40 patients (22%), the findings of the pelvic exam were not as predicted, but resulted in no change in the clinical plan. In 12 cases (6%) the exam revealed a finding that was both unexpected and changed the clinical plan. Only one of these patients was admitted. Of the 24 patients who were admitted, four had a pelvic exam that revealed unexpected results, but only one of these cases caused the physician to change the care planned for the patient.

Conclusion: In 94% of women with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding, the results of the pelvic exam were either predictable or had no effect on the clinical plan. This suggests that there may be a subset of women with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding in whom a pelvic exam may safely be deferred.

References

    1. Close RJ, Sachs CJ, Dyne PL. Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med. 2001;175:240–4.
    1. Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:593–8.
    1. Larsen M, Oldeide CC, Malterud K. Not so bad after all..., Women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract. 1997;14:148–52.
    1. Moettus A, Sklar D, Tandberg D. The effect of physician gender on women’s perceived pain and embarrassment during pelvic examination. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:635–7.
    1. Seymore C, DuRant RH, Jay MS, et al. Influence of position during examination, and sex of examiner on patient anxiety during pelvic examination. J Pediatr. 1986;108:312–7.
    1. Seehusen DA, Johnson DR, Earwood JS, et al. Improving women’s experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2006;333:171.
    1. Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS. American College of Emergency Physicians Emergency medicine : a comprehensive study guide. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 2000.
    1. Edelman A, Anderson J, Lai S, et al. Videos in clinical medicine. Pelvic examination. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:e26.
    1. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers M, et al. Sabiston textbook of surgery : the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.
    1. Norton J, Bollinger RR, Chang A, et al. Surgery: Basic science and clinical evidence. New York: Springer; 2001.
    1. Corson JG, Williamson R, et al. Surgery. London: Mosby; 2001.
    1. Macdonald JW. A clinical textbook of surgical diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1898.
    1. Dart RG, Kaplan B, Varaklis K. Predictive value of history and physical examination in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:283–90.
    1. Brown T, Herbert ME. Medical myth: Bimanual pelvic examination is a reliable decision aid in the investigation of acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. CJEM. 2003;5:120–2.
    1. Stiell IG, McDowell I, Nair RC, et al. Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians’ attitudes and practice. CMAJ. 1992;147:1671–8.
    1. Olson BK. Patient comfort during pelvic examination. New foot supports vs metal stirrups. JOGN Nurs. 1981;10:104–7.
    1. Williams JG, Park LI, Kline J. Reducing distress associated with pelvic examinations: a stimulus control intervention. Women Health. 1992;18:41–53.
    1. Patton KR, Bartfield JM, McErlean M. The effect of practitioner characteristics on patient pain and embarrassment during ED internal examinations. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21:205–7.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Committee on quality of health care in America: crossing the quality chasm. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner