Accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements on conventional and CBCT images: An in vitro comparative study

Kumar Adarsh, Payal Sharma, Achint Juneja, Kumar Adarsh, Payal Sharma, Achint Juneja

Abstract

Context: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements using conventional and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging techniques.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of various tooth length measurements made on CBCT scans and conventional imaging techniques [intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPA) and orthopantomogram (OPG)].

Settings and design: This is an in-vitro comparative study.

Subjects and methods: In total, 50 extracted single-rooted premolar teeth were mounted on the dry human mandible. For each extracted tooth, measurements for tooth length, crown length, and root lengths were taken with a Vernier caliper and using three imaging modalities: CBCT, OPG, and IOPA radiographs. The measurements were compared with the gold standard (Vernier caliper).

Statistical analysis used: One-way analysis of variance was used to compare mean values between the groups that are Vernier caliper, CBCT, IOPA, and OPG. The multiple comparisons of means of tooth length, root length, and crown length were done by Bonferroni test.

Results: A significant difference in the tooth length measurements was seen between the measurements taken by CBCT and IOPA and between IOPA and OPG. But, no significant difference was seen between any other groups. The highly significant difference was seen between the root length measurements taken by IOPA and OPG and by CBCT and OPG. However, no significant difference was seen between any other groups. No significant difference was seen in between the crown length measurements taken by Vernier caliper and CBCT and between IOPA and OPG. However, a significant difference was seen between all the groups.

Conclusions: Among the radiographic techniques, CBCT was found to be the most accurate in measuring the tooth, root, and crown lengths.

Keywords: CBCT; IOPA; conventional radiographic technique; tooth length measurements.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement by Vernier caliper
Figure 2
Figure 2
Extracted teeth mounted on the human mandible
Figure 3
Figure 3
Measurement by cone-beam computed tomography
Figure 4
Figure 4
Measurement by orthopantomogram
Figure 5
Figure 5
Measurement by intraoral periapical radiograph

References

    1. Mah J, Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(Suppl 1):10–6.
    1. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:505–10.
    1. Artun J, Smale I, Behbehani F, Doppel D, Van’t Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:919–26.
    1. McNab S, Battistutta D, Taverne A, Symons AL. External apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:227–32.
    1. Kazzi D, Horner K, Qualtrough AC, Martinez-Beneyto Y, Rushton VE. A comparative study of three periapical radiographic techniques for endodontic working length estimation. Int Endod J. 2007;40:526–31.
    1. Brezniak N, Goren S, Zoizner R, Dinbar A, Arad A, Wasserstein A, et al. A comparison of three methods to accurately measure root length. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:786–91.
    1. White SC, Pharoah MJ, Tyndall DA. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation.
    1. Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:28–31.
    1. Schropp L, Alyass NS, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:686–90.
    1. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-newTom) Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:291–4.
    1. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:112–6.
    1. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:S100–8.
    1. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG, et al. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387–95.
    1. Brezniak N, Goren S, Zoizner R, Dinbar A, Arad A, Wasserstein A, et al. The use of an individual jig in measuring tooth length changes. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:780–5.
    1. Alqerban A, Hedesiu M, Baciut M, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, et al. Pre-surgical treatment planning of maxillary canine impactions using panoramic vs. cone beam CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130157.
    1. Pittayapat P, Bornstein MM, Imada TS, Coucke W, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: Two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:202–8.
    1. Asgary S, Nikneshan S, Akbarzadeh-Bagheban A, Emadi N. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8:e1–8.
    1. Anter E, Zayet MK, El-Dessouky SH. Accuracy and precision of cone beam computed tomography in periodontal defects measurement (systematic review) J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20:235–43.
    1. Rokn AR, Hashemi K, Akbari S, Kharazifard MJ, Barikani H, Panjnoosh M, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography in comparison with clinical measurements. J Dent (Tehran) 2016;13:333–9.
    1. Yi J, Sun Y, Li Y, Li C, Li X, Zhao Z. Cone-beam computed tomography versus periapical radiograph for diagnosing external root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:328–37.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner