The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys

Jenny De Jong Gierveld, Theo Van Tilburg, Jenny De Jong Gierveld, Theo Van Tilburg

Abstract

Loneliness concerns the subjective evaluation of the situation individuals are involved in, characterized either by a number of relationships with friends and colleagues which is smaller than is considered desirable (social loneliness), as well as situations where the intimacy in confidant relationships one wishes for has not been realized (emotional loneliness). To identify people who are lonely direct questions are not sufficient; loneliness scales are preferred. In this article, the quality of the three-item scale for emotional loneliness and the three-item scale for social loneliness has been investigated for use in the following countries participating in the United Nations "Generations and Gender Surveys": France, Germany, the Netherlands, Russia, Bulgaria, Georgia, and Japan. Sample sizes for the 7 countries varied between 8,158 and 12,828. Translations of the De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale have been tested using reliability and validity tests including a confirmatory factor analysis to test the two-dimensional structure of loneliness. Test outcomes indicated for each of the countries under investigation reliable and valid scales for emotional and social loneliness, respectively.

References

    1. Buber I, Engelhardt H. Children’s impact on the mental health of their older mothers and fathers: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Eur J Ageing. 2008;5:31–45. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0074-8.
    1. Carstensen LL. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for Socioemotional Selectivity Theory. Psychol Aging. 1992;7:331–338. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331.
    1. Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP Study. J Gerontol Soc Sci. 2009;64B(suppl 1):i38–i46.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Kamphuis F. The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9:289–299. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900307.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG. Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam: VU University; 1999.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG. A six-item scale for overall, emotional and social loneliness: confirmative tests on new survey data. Res Aging. 2006;28:582–598. doi: 10.1177/0164027506289723.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA. Loneliness and social isolation. In: Vangelisti A, Perlman D, editors. Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 485–500.
    1. De Jong Gierveld J, Broese van Groenou M, Hoogendoorn AW, Smit JH. Quality of marriages in later life and emotional and social loneliness. J Gerontol Soc Sci. 2009;64B:497–506.
    1. Dykstra PA. Older adult loneliness: myths and realities. Eur J Ageing. 2009;6:91–100. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0110-3.
    1. Dykstra PA, De Jong Gierveld J. The theory of mental incongruity, with a specific application to loneliness among widowed men and women. In: Erber R, Gilmour R, editors. Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum; 1994. pp. 235–259.
    1. Dykstra PA, Fokkema T. Social and emotional loneliness among divorced and married men and women: comparing the deficit and cognitive perspectives. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;29:1–12.
    1. Hawkley LC, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Masi CM, Thisted RA, Cacioppo JT. From social structural factors to perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness: the Chicago health, aging, and social relations study. J Gerontol Soc Sci. 2008;63B:S375–S384.
    1. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3:424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
    1. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criterion for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1993) LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. SSI, Chicago, IL
    1. Korporaal M, Broese van Groenou M, Van Tilburg TG. Effects of own and spousal disability on loneliness among older adults. J Aging Health. 2008;20:306–325. doi: 10.1177/0898264308315431.
    1. Leung GTY, De Jong Gierveld J, Lam LCW. Validation of the Chinese translation of the 6-item De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale in elderly Chinese. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:1262–1272. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007552.
    1. Penninx BWJH, Van Tilburg TG, Kriegsman DMW, Boeke AJP, Deeg DJH, Van Eijk JTM. Social network, social support, and loneliness in older persons with different chronic diseases. J Aging Health. 1999;11:151–168. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100202.
    1. Perlman D, Peplau LA. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In: Gilmour R, Duck S, editors. Personal relationships 3: personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic; 1981. pp. 31–43.
    1. Pinquart M. Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. J Soc Pers Rel. 2003;20:31–53.
    1. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences on loneliness in older adults: a meta-analysis. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;23:245–266.
    1. Savikko N, Routasalo PE, Tilvis RS, Strandberg TE, Pitkala KH. Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005;41:223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.03.002.
    1. Stevens N, Westerhof GJ. Marriage, social integration and loneliness in the second half of life: a comparison of Dutch and German men and women. Res Aging. 2006;28:713–729. doi: 10.1177/0164027506291747.
    1. Van Tilburg TG. Losing and gaining in old age: changes in personal network size and social support in a four-year longitudinal study. J Gerontol Soc Sci. 1998;53B:S313–S323.
    1. Vikat A, Spéder Z, Beets G, Billari FC, Bühler C, Désesquelles A et al (2007) Generations and gender programme: concepts and guidelines. United Nations, New York and Geneva
    1. Waite LJ, Gallagher M. The case for marriage: why married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. New York: Doubleday; 2000.
    1. Weiss RS. Loneliness: the experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1973.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner