Beyond Traditional Newspaper Advertisement: Leveraging Facebook-Targeted Advertisement to Recruit Long-Term Smokers for Research

Lisa Carter-Harris, Rebecca Bartlett Ellis, Adam Warrick, Susan Rawl, Lisa Carter-Harris, Rebecca Bartlett Ellis, Adam Warrick, Susan Rawl

Abstract

Background: Smokers are a stigmatized population, but an important population to reach for the purpose of research. Therefore, innovative recruitment methods are needed that are both cost-effective and efficacious in recruiting this population.

Objective: The aim of the present article was to evaluate the feasibility of Facebook-targeted advertisement to recruit long-term smokers eligible for lung cancer screening for a descriptive, cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A social media recruitment campaign was launched using Facebook-targeted advertisement to target age and keywords related to tobacco smoking in the Facebook users profile, interests, and likes. A 3-day newspaper advertisement recruitment campaign was used as a comparison. The study that used both recruitment methods aimed to test the psychometric properties of 4 newly developed lung cancer screening health belief scales. Data were collected via cross-sectional survey methodology using an Web-based survey platform.

Results: The Facebook-targeted advertisements were viewed 56,621 times over an 18-day campaign in 2015 in the United States. The advertisement campaign yielded 1121 unique clicks to the Web-based survey platform at a cost of $1.51 per completed survey. Of those who clicked through to the study survey platform, 423 (37.7%) consented to participate; 92 (8.2%) dropped out during completion of the survey yielding a final study pool of 331 completed surveys. Recruitment by newspaper advertisement yielded a total of 30 participants in response to a 3-day advertisement campaign; recruitment efficacy resulted in 10 participants/day at $40.80 per completed survey. Participants represented current (n=182; 51%) and former smokers (n=178; 49%) with a mean age of 63.4 years (SD 6.0). Cost of the advertisement campaign was $500 total for the 18-day campaign.

Conclusions: Recruitment by Facebook was more efficacious and cost-effective compared with newspaper advertisement. Facebook offers a new venue for recruitment into research studies that offer the potential for wider reach at a lower cost while providing privacy and flexibility for potential study participants. The study's findings extend recent work of other researchers who have demonstrated Facebook's utility with younger smokers, and Facebook is an effective tool to recruit older smokers. Furthermore, Facebook is a cost-effective alternative to traditional newspaper advertisement offering a new, affordable venue to recruit large numbers of older smokers efficiently.

Keywords: facebook; older; recruitment methods; smokers.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Keyword Metrics of Potential Reach for Facebook Targeted Advertisement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Facebook Recruitment Advertisement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow diagram of clicks to website, eligibility, consent to participate, and dropouts.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of Participants Recruited from Facebook Each Day of the Study.

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta: American; 2015. [2016-04-27]. .
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395–409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873.
    1. Wender R, Fontham Elizabeth T H. Barrera E, Colditz GA, Church TR, Ettinger DS, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Gazelle GS, Kelsey DK, LaMonte SJ, Michaelson JS, Oeffinger KC, Shih YT, Sullivan DC, Travis W, Walter L, Wolf Andrew M D. Brawley OW, Smith RA. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):107–17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21172.
    1. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330–8. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771.
    1. Carter-Harris L. Lung cancer stigma as a barrier to medical help-seeking behavior: Practice implications. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015 May;27(5):240–5. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12227.
    1. Cataldo JK, Jahan TM, Pongquan VL. Lung cancer stigma, depression, and quality of life among ever and never smokers. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012 Jul;16(3):264–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.06.008.
    1. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1470. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C.
    1. Shen MJ, Hamann HA, Thomas AJ, Ostroff JS. Association between patient-provider communication and lung cancer stigma. Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2093–9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3014-0.
    1. Ramo DE, Rodriguez Theresa M S. Chavez K, Sommer MJ, Prochaska JJ. Facebook Recruitment of Young Adult Smokers for a Cessation Trial: Methods, Metrics, and Lessons Learned. Internet Interv. 2014 Apr;1(2):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.05.001.
    1. Gold J, Pedrana AE, Sacks-Davis R, Hellard ME, Chang S, Howard S, Keogh L, Hocking JS, Stoove MA. A systematic examination of the use of online social networking sites for sexual health promotion. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:583. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-583.
    1. Nelson EJ, Hughes J, Oakes JM, Pankow JS, Kulasingam SL. Estimation of geographic variation in human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in men and women: an online survey using facebook recruitment. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3506.
    1. Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG. Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Feb;16(2):247–51. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt157.
    1. Batterham PJ. Recruitment of mental health survey participants using Internet advertising: content, characteristics and cost effectiveness. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jun;23(2):184–91. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1421.
    1. Mychasiuk R, Benzies K. Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Sep;38(5):753–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01326.x.
    1. Jones L, Saksvig BI, Grieser M, Young DR. Recruiting adolescent girls into a follow-up study: benefits of using a social networking website. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Mar;33(2):268–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.10.011.
    1. Altshuler AL, Gerns Storey Helen L. Prager SW. Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):226–33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.009.
    1. Villanti AC, Jacobs MA, Zawistowski G, Brookover J, Stanton CA, Graham AL. Impact of Baseline Assessment Modality on Enrollment and Retention in a Facebook Smoking Cessation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4341.
    1. Pedersen ER, Helmuth ED, Marshall GN, Schell TL, PunKay M, Kurz J. Using facebook to recruit young adult veterans: online mental health research. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e63. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3996.
    1. Amon KL, Paxton K, Klineberg E, Riley L, Hawke C, Steinbeck K. Insights into Facebook Pages: an early adolescent health research study page targeted at parents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016 Feb 1;28(1):69–77. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2014-0074.
    1. Fazzino TL, Rose GL, Pollack SM, Helzer JE. Recruiting U.S. and Canadian college students via social media for participation in a web-based brief intervention study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jan;76(1):127–32.
    1. Nicholas A, Bailey JV, Stevenson F, Murray E. The Sexunzipped trial: young people's views of participating in an online randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e276. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2647.
    1. Hernandez-Romieu AC, Sullivan PS, Sanchez TH, Kelley CF, Peterson JL, Del RC, Salazar LF, Frew PM, Rosenberg ES. The comparability of men who have sex with men recruited from venue-time-space sampling and facebook: a cohort study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(3):e37. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3342.
    1. Haines-Saah RJ, Kelly MT, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Picture Me Smokefree: a qualitative study using social media and digital photography to engage young adults in tobacco reduction and cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4061.
    1. Rait MA, Prochaska JJ, Rubinstein ML. Recruitment of adolescents for a smoking study: use of traditional strategies and social media. Transl Behav Med. 2015 Sep;5(3):254–9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0312-5.
    1. PR Newswire. [2016-01-05]. .
    1. Duggan M, Ellison N, Lampe C, Lenhart A, Madden M. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2014. Demographics of key social networking platforms - 2014 .
    1. Carter-Harris L, Slavin J, Monahan PO, Rawl SM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the lung cancer screening health belief scales. CANCER NURSING: An International Journal for Cancer Care. 2016:NA–NA. (forthcoming)
    1. Kramer J, Rubin A, Coster W, Helmuth E, Hermos J, Rosenbloom D, Moed R, Dooley M, Kao Y, Liljenquist K, Brief D, Enggasser J, Keane T, Roy M, Lachowicz M. Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web-based research. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Mar;23(1):120–9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1415.
    1. Valdez RS, Guterbock TM, Thompson MJ, Reilly JD, Menefee HK, Bennici MS, Williams IC, Rexrode DL. Beyond traditional advertisements: leveraging Facebook's social structures for research recruitment. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(10):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3786.
    1. Heffner JL, Wyszynski CM, Comstock B, Mercer LD, Bricker J. Overcoming recruitment challenges of web-based interventions for tobacco use: the case of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2013 Oct;38(10):2473–6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.05.004.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner