Patient-Reported Complications after Intravitreal Injection and Their Predictive Factors

Michael S Ramos, Lucy T Xu, Srinidhi Singuri, Julio C Castillo Tafur, Sruthi Arepalli, Justis P Ehlers, Peter K Kaiser, Rishi P Singh, Aleksandra V Rachitskaya, Sunil K Srivastava, Jonathan E Sears, Andrew P Schachat, Amy S Babiuch, Sumit Sharma, Daniel F Martin, Careen Y Lowder, Arun D Singh, Alex Yuan, Amy S Nowacki, Michael S Ramos, Lucy T Xu, Srinidhi Singuri, Julio C Castillo Tafur, Sruthi Arepalli, Justis P Ehlers, Peter K Kaiser, Rishi P Singh, Aleksandra V Rachitskaya, Sunil K Srivastava, Jonathan E Sears, Andrew P Schachat, Amy S Babiuch, Sumit Sharma, Daniel F Martin, Careen Y Lowder, Arun D Singh, Alex Yuan, Amy S Nowacki

Abstract

Purpose: The intravitreal injection (IVI) of pharmacologic agents is the most commonly performed ocular procedure and is associated with a host of complications. Most IVI-related complications data are derived from randomized controlled clinical trials, which report a high adverse event rate. The nature of these protocol-driven trials limit their applicability to the diverse circumstances seen in routine clinical practice. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of patient-reported IVI-related complications, their risk factors, and the manner in which patients sought treatment at a tertiary eye care center.

Design: Retrospective, institutional review board-approved study.

Participants: Forty-four thousand seven hundred thirty-four injections in 5318 unique patients at the Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute from 2012 through 2016.

Methods: Intravitreal injection.

Main outcome measures: Complication occurrence within 15 days of injection.

Results: From 2012 through 2016, a total of 44734 injections were performed in 5318 unique patients. Overall, complication rates were low, representing 1.9% of all injections, with 1031 unique complications in 685 patients (12.9%). The most common minor complications, or those not requiring intervention, were irritation (n = 312) and subconjunctival hemorrhage (n = 284). The most common serious complications, or those requiring intervention, were corneal abrasion (n = 46) and iritis (n = 31). Most complications (66%) were managed adequately by a telephone or Epic (Epic Systems Corp., Verona, WI) electronic message encounter only. Importantly, no injection protocol parameter, such as type of anesthesia, preparation, or post-injection medication, increased the risk of a complication. However, a patient's gender, age, number of previous injections, and provider strongly influenced the risk of patient-reported complications.

Conclusions: Overall, complication rates seen in routine clinical practice were low compared with clinical trial reporting. Providers should feel confident in the safety and administration of IVI during times when follow-up office visits and resources may be limited. When performing an IVI, factors such as a patient's gender, age, number of previous injections, and provider must be taken into account to ensure the best possible outcomes.

Keywords: Complications; Intravitreal injection; Predictive factors; Retrospective.

Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing criteria for no complication, complication, and endophthalmitis groups. Patients with endophthalmitis were excluded from this study. ED = emergency department; IVI = intravitreal injection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar graph showing patient encounters sorted by complication type. Encounters with multiple complications were categorized by the higher-acuity complication. The total number of encounters was 841. ED = emergency department.

References

    1. Grzybowski A., Told R., Sacu S., et al. 2018 Update on intravitreal injections: Euretina expert consensus recommendations. Ophthalmologica. 2018;239:181–193.
    1. Nguyen Q.D., Brown D.M., Marcus D.M., et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:789–801.
    1. Heier J.S., Brown D.M., Chong V., et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2537–2548.
    1. Patsopoulos N.A. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13:217–224.
    1. Shah C.P., Garg S.J., Vander J.F., et al. Outcomes and risk factors associated with endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2028–2034.
    1. Fileta J.B., Scott I.U., Flynn H.W. Meta-analysis of infectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2014;45:143–149.
    1. Xu K., Chin E.K., Bennett S.R., et al. Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: management and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1279–1286.
    1. Ladas I.D., Karagiannis D.A., Rouvas A.A., et al. Safety of repeat intravitreal injections of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab: our experience after 2,000 injections. Retina. 2009;29:313–318.
    1. Tolentino M. Systemic and ocular safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies for ocular neovascular disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56:95–113.
    1. Popovic M.M., Muni R.H., Nichani P., Kertes P.J. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain resulting from intravitreal injections: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4:461–470.
    1. Kaplan R.I., Rosen R.B., Gentile R.C. Optimizing the patient experience and satisfaction: the role of topical NSAIDs with intravitreal injections. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4:459–460.
    1. Stem M.S., Rao P., Lee I.J., et al. Predictors of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection: a multivariable analysis based on injection protocol and povidone iodine strength. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3:3–7.
    1. Reibaldi M., Pulvirenti A., Avitabile T., et al. Pooled estimates of incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents with and without topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Retina. 2018;38:1–11.
    1. Jonas J.B., Spandau U.H., Schlichtenbrede F. Short-term complications of intravitreal injections of triamcinolone and bevacizumab. Eye. 2008;22:590–591.
    1. Severn P.S., Hamilton R. The incidence of serious complications associated with intravitreal therapy in a quaternary ARMD service (2008–2014) Eye (Lond) 2015;29(1):150.
    1. Ozkiris A., Erkilic K. Complications of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40:63–68.
    1. Bayar S.A., Altinors D.D., Kucukerdonmez C., Akova Y.A. Severe corneal changes following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18:268–274.
    1. Mezad-Koursh D., Goldstein M., Heilwail G., et al. Clinical characteristics of endophthalmitis after an injection of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor. Retina. 2010;30:1051–1057.
    1. Farrimond H. Beyond the caveman: rethinking masculinity in relation to men’s help-seeking. Health (Irvine Calif) 2012;16:208–225.
    1. Addis M.E., Mahalik J.R. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003;58:5–14.
    1. Gough B. The psychology of men’s health: maximizing masculine capital. Heal Psychol. 2013;32:1–4.
    1. Grossniklaus H.E., Nickerson J.M., Edelhauser H.F., et al. Anatomic alterations in aging and age-related diseases of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:ORSF23–ORSF27.
    1. Aspinall R., Lang P.O. Interventions to restore appropriate immune function in the elderly. Immun Ageing. 2018;15:5.
    1. Friedman D.A., Mason J.O., Emond T., McGwin G. Povidone-iodine contact time and lid speculum use during intravitreal injection. Retina. 2013;33:975–981.
    1. Fagan X.J., Al-Qureshi S. Intravitreal injections: a review of the evidence for best practice. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41:500–507.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner