A randomised controlled feasibility trial of E-health application supported care vs usual care after exacerbation of COPD: the RESCUE trial

Mal North, Simon Bourne, Ben Green, Anoop J Chauhan, Tom Brown, Jonathan Winter, Tom Jones, Dan Neville, Alison Blythin, Alastair Watson, Matthew Johnson, David Culliford, Jack Elkes, Victoria Cornelius, Tom M A Wilkinson, Mal North, Simon Bourne, Ben Green, Anoop J Chauhan, Tom Brown, Jonathan Winter, Tom Jones, Dan Neville, Alison Blythin, Alastair Watson, Matthew Johnson, David Culliford, Jack Elkes, Victoria Cornelius, Tom M A Wilkinson

Abstract

Exacerbations of COPD are one of the commonest causes of admission and readmission to hospital. The role of digital interventions to support self-management in improving outcomes is uncertain. We conducted an open, randomised controlled trial of a digital health platform application (app) in 41 COPD patients recruited following hospital admission with an acute exacerbation. Subjects were randomised to either receive usual care, including a written self-management plan (n = 21), or the myCOPD app (n = 20) for 90 days. The primary efficacy outcome was recovery rate of symptoms measured by COPD assessment test (CAT) score. Exacerbations, readmission, inhaler technique quality of life and patient activation (PAM) scores were also captured by a blinded team. The app was acceptable in this care setting and was used by 17 of the 20 patients with sustained use over the study period. The treatment effect on the CAT score was 4.49 (95% CI: -8.41, -0.58) points lower in the myCOPD arm. Patients' inhaler technique improved in the digital intervention arm (101 improving to 20 critical errors) compared to usual care (100 to 72 critical errors). Exacerbations tended to be less frequent in the digital arm compared to usual care; 34 vs 18 events. Hospital readmissions risk was numerically lower in the digital intervention arm: OR for readmission 0.383 (95% CI: 0.074, 1.987; n = 35). In this feasibility study of the digital self-management platform myCOPD, the app has proven acceptable to patients to use and use has improved exacerbation recovery rates, with strong signals of lower re-exacerbation and readmission rates over 90 days. myCOPD reduced the number of critical errors in inhaler technique compared to usual care with written self-management. This provides a strong basis for further exploration of the use of app interventions in the context of recently hospitalised patients with COPD and informs the potential design of a large multi-centre trial.

Keywords: Disease prevention; Respiratory tract diseases.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsT.W. is the co-founder, shareholder and director, S.B. is the co-founder, shareholder and director M.N. and A.B are employees of Mymhealth Limited. T.W., S.B. and M.N. have received personal fees during the conduct of the study. B.G. and T.B. received grants from Mymhealth Limited. Outside the submitted work, T.B. has received grants from GSK and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Teva, Napp Pharmaceuticals and Novartis as well as non-financial support from GSK, Teva and Novartis. Outside the submitted work, T.W. has received grants from GSK, AstraZeneca and Synairgen and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Synairgen and BI. A.J.C., J.W., T.J., D.N., A.W., D.C., M.J., J.E. and V.C. have nothing to disclose.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Figures

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of study participants.
Fig. 1. Flow diagram of study participants.
Indicated is the consort flowchart of study participants through the study. Showing the number of eligible patients, number excluded and reasons for exclusion, number randomised to each arm, number of loses to follow up in each arm and number included in the analysis for each arm.
Fig. 2. Mean weekly usage and mean…
Fig. 2. Mean weekly usage and mean number of users by week of the trial.
Indicated is the mean weekly usage (green) and number of users of the app (red) over the 12 week study period. Mean weekly usage is the number of days per week that the app was accessed. The number of users is the number of participants that used the app at least once in that week.
Fig. 3. Standardised CAT score by trial…
Fig. 3. Standardised CAT score by trial arm over time.
Indicated is the mean standardised CAT scores over the 3-month study in both the Treatment as Usual (Red) and MyCOPD App (Blue) arms. 95% confidence intervals are shown in light grey.
Fig. 4. Rate ratio estimates of numbers…
Fig. 4. Rate ratio estimates of numbers of exacerbations and inhaler errors.
Indicated are the incidence rate ratio estimates (and 95% confidence intervals) for number of exacerbations and inhaler errors.

References

    1. Snell N, Strachan D, Hubbard R, Gibson J, Gruffydd-Jones K, et al. S32 Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the uk: findings from the british lung foundation’s ‘respiratory health of the nation’ project. Thorax. 2016;71:A20–A20.
    1. BLF. Out in the Cold Lung Disease The Hidden Driver of NHS Winter Pressures (British Lung Foundation, London, 2017).
    1. Department of Health. Long Term Conditions Compendium of Information. 3rd edn (Department of Health, 2012).
    1. Wilkinson, T. M. A. et al. A prospective, observational cohort study of the seasonal dynamics of airway pathogens in the aetiology of exacerbations in COPD. Thorax72, 919–927.
    1. Williams NP, Coombs NA, Johnson MJ, Josephs LK, Rigge LA, et al. Seasonality, risk factors and burden of community-acquired pneumonia in COPD patients: a population database study using linked health care records. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2017;12:313–322. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S121389.
    1. Wedzicha, J. A. & Wilkinson, T. Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations on patients and payers. Proc. Am. Thorac Soc.3, 218–221.
    1. Kong CW, Wilkinson TMA. Predicting and preventing hospital readmission for exacerbations of COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6:00325–02019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00325-2019.
    1. Royal College of Physicians. COPD: Working Together National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Audit Programme: Clinical audit of COPD exacerbations admitted to acute hospitals in England and Wales 2017 (Royal College of Physicians, 2017)
    1. Mayhew, D. et al. Longitudinal profiling of the lung microbiome in the AERIS study demonstrates repeatability of bacterial and eosinophilic COPD exacerbations. Thorax73, 422–430.
    1. Adams SG, Smith PK, Allan PF, Anzueto A, Pugh JA, Cornell JE. Systematic review of the chronic care model in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevention and management. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007;167:551–561. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.6.551.
    1. Effing T, Monninkhof E. van dV, et al, Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007;1:CD002990.
    1. Bourbeau J, van der Palen J. Promoting effective self-management programmes to improve COPD. Eur. Respiratory J. 2009;33:461–463. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00001309.
    1. Bourbeau J, Collet J-P, Schwartzman K, Ducruet T, Nault D, et al. Economic benefits of self-management education in COPD. Chest. 2006;130:1704–1711. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1704.
    1. British Lung Foundation (BLF). Lost in Translation (BLF, London, 2006).
    1. Hopkinson, N. S. et al. Designing and implementing a COPD discharge care bundle. Thorax67, 90–92 (2012).
    1. Peiris D, Miranda JJ, Mohr DC. Going beyond killer apps: building a better mHealth evidence base. BMJ Glob. Health. 2018;3:e000676. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000676.
    1. Birnbaum F, Lewis D, Rosen RK, Ranney ML. Patient engagement and the design of digital health. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2015;22:754–756. doi: 10.1111/acem.12692.
    1. Ding H, Fatehi F, Maiorana A, et al. Digital health for COPD care: the current state of play. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019;11:S2210–S2220. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.17.
    1. Sobnath, D. D. et al. Features of a mobile support app for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: literature review and current applications JMIR Mhealth Uhealth5, e17 (2017).
    1. Chan C, Yamabayashi C, Syed N, Kirkham A, Camp PG. Exercise telemonitoring and telerehabilitation compared with traditional cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother. Can. Physiotherapie Can. 2016;68:242–51.. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-33.
    1. Moy ML, Collins RJ, Martinez CH, Kadri R, Roman P, Holleman RG, et al. An internet-mediated pedometer-based program improves health-related quality-of-life domains and daily step counts in COPD: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2015;148:128–37.. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1466.
    1. Nguyen HQ, Gill DP, Wolpin S, Steele BG, Benditt JO. Pilot study of a cell phone-based exercise persistence intervention post-rehabilitation for COPD. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2009;4:301–13. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S6643.
    1. Voncken-Brewster, V., Tange, H., de Vries, H., Nagykaldi, Z., Winkens, B. & van der Weijden, T. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a web-based, computer-tailored self-management intervention for people with or at risk for COPD. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis.10,1061–1073 (2015).
    1. Rassouli F, Boutellier D, Duss J, Huber S, Brutsche MH. Digitalizing multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD with a smartphone application: an international observational pilot study. Int J. Chron. Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:3831–3836. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S182880.
    1. Bourne S, DeVos R, North M, et al. Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014580. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580.
    1. Crooks, M., Elkes, J., Storrar, W., Roy, K., North, M. et al. Evidence generation for the clinical impact of myCOPD in patients with mild, moderate and newly diagnosed COPD: a randomised controlled trial. ERJ Open. in press.
    1. Robbins R, Krebs P, Jagannathan R, et al. Health App use among US mobile phone users: analysis of trends by chronic disease status. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5:e197. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7832.
    1. Internet users, UK: 2018 Internet use in the UK annual estimates by age, sex, disability and geographical. Office of National Statistics. Available online: (Accessed 1 Apr 2020).
    1. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell CA, et al. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 2016;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
    1. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2016. (Accessed 1 Nov 2019).
    1. Derdak S. Prevention of COPD readmissions: a work in progress. Respiratory Care. 2017;62:133–134. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05350.
    1. van der Palen J, Thomas M, Chrystyn H, et al. A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices. npj Prim. Care Respiratory Med. 2016;ume 26:16079. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.79.
    1. Dodd JW, Hogg L, Nolan J, et al. The COPD assessment test (CAT): response to pulmonary rehabilitation. A multicentre, prospective study. Thorax. 2011;66:425–429. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.156372.
    1. Watson A, Spalluto CM, McCrae C, Cellura D, Burke H, et al. Dynamics of IFN-β responses during respiratory viral infection. insights for therapeutic strategies. Am. J. respiratory Crit. Care Med. 2020;201:83–94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201901-0214OC.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Health Serv. Res. 2005;40:1918–1930. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
    1. Ostridge K, Wilkinson TMA. Present and future utility of computed tomography scanning in the assessment and management of COPD. Eur. Respiratory J. 2016;48:216–228. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00041-2016.
    1. Ostridge K, Williams N, Kim V, Bennett M, Harden S, et al. Relationship between pulmonary matrix metalloproteinases and quantitative CT markers of small airways disease and emphysema in COPD. Thorax. 2016;71:126–132. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207428.
    1. Bekkat-Berkani R, Wilkinson T, Buchy P, et al. Seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with COPD: a systematic literature review. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017;17:79. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0420-8.
    1. Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Mann A, Gilbert A, et al. A synthetic influenza virus vaccine induces a cellular immune response that correlates with reduction in symptomatology and virus shedding in a randomized phase Ib live-virus challenge in humans. Clin. Vaccin. immunology: Cvi. 2015;22:828–35.. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00098-15.
    1. Sanei F, Wilkinson T. Influenza vaccination for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: understanding immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness. Therapeutic Adv. Respiratory Dis. 2016;10:349–367. doi: 10.1177/1753465816646050.
    1. Hardinge, M., Suntharalingam, J. & Wilkinson, T. Guideline update: The British Thoracic Society Guidelines on home oxygen use in adults. Thorax70, 589–591.
    1. NICE guideline [NG115]. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Over 16s: Diagnosis and Management (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines, 2018).
    1. Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H. & Baveystock, C. M. The St George’s respiratory questionnaire. Respiratory Med.85, 25–31 (1991); discussion 33-27.
    1. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv. Res. 2004;39:1005–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scandinavica. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. McAuley P, Myers J, Abella J, Froelicher V. Evaluation of a specific activity questionnaire to predict mortality in men referred for exercise testing. Am. Heart J. 2006;151:890.e891–897. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.09.017.
    1. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics. 1993;4:353–365. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner