Intrinsic Capacity as a Determinant of Physical Resilience in Older Adults

J K Chhetri, Q-L Xue, L Ma, P Chan, R Varadhan, J K Chhetri, Q-L Xue, L Ma, P Chan, R Varadhan

Abstract

The traditional disease-oriented model of healthcare is inadequate to address the needs of the older population. Greater attention should be given to strategies that promote healthy aging. Recently proposed constructs of intrinsic capacity (IC) and physical resilience (PR) hold great potential to reshape geriatric medicine and aging research. These constructs accentuate the positive health attributes of older people in contrast to the popular frailty construct that is centered on functional deficits. IC was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a composite of all the physical and mental capacities. WHO has emphasized enhancement of IC throughout the life course so as to maintain functional ability in old age. PR, recently highlighted by the National Institute on Aging, is the ability to successfully cope with stressors. High levels of resilience can result in desirable clinical and functional outcomes after stressors. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying physiology of PR and the risk factors contributing to diminished PR. The main goal of this article is to explore the potential relationship between IC and PR. Based on a classical theory of aging, we postulate that IC is a determinant of PR and is also a high-level integrative measure of physiologic reserve which is the fundamental factor underlying one's ability to withstand stressors. A major implication of our postulates is that even though IC is only one of the many determinants of PR, it could serve as an important intervenable target for enhancing resilience in older adults.

Keywords: Resilience; aging; frailty; integrated care; physiologic reserve.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concept model showing the link between intrinsic capacity, physiologic reserve and physical resilience Physical resilience (PR) is a dynamical concept that is defined only under conditions when an organism is exposed to a stressor. The physiological response to the stressor is governed by PR. Long-term outcomes such as physical and cognitive functions, and clinical outcomes will be better for organisms with larger PR. Figure 1 also shows the pre-determinants of PR including age, psychosocial factors, health behaviors, genetics, and diseases. We hypothesize that the impact of these factors on PR is mediated through the intrinsic capacity of the organism. Intrinsic capacity is a high-level integrative measure of the underlying physiologic reserve of the organism, which is the weighted sum of organ-specific reserves (also see Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physiologic reserve as the link between intrinsic capacity and physical resilience (based on the Strehler and Mildvan theory of aging) Darker triangle denotes a robust system, which has a higher physiologic reserve and its integrative function or Intrinsic Capacity (IC), therefore, with higher level of physical resilience(PR). Every time a system is exposed to a stressor it uses some of its physiologic reserve (depending on the magnitude of stressor) to overcome the challenge (that leads to a reduction in IC), therefore will have lower level of PR. Gradual exposure to multiple stressors over time reduces the physiologic reserve/IC/PR greatly leaving the system vulnerable (triangle gets lighter in the figure), ultimately leading to death.

References

    1. Cesari M, Araujo de Carvalho I, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan J, Cooper C, Martin FC, Reginster J-Y, Vellas B, Beard JR. Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73:1653–1660. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly011.
    1. WHO | WHO Guidelines on Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) WHO. Available at: . Accessed January 10, 2020.
    1. Hadley EC, Kuchel GA, Newman AB, Workshop Speakers and Participants Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:980–990. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx015.
    1. Whitson HE, Duan-Porter W, Schmader KE, Morey MC, Cohen HJ, Colón-Emeric CS. Physical Resilience in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Development of an Emerging Construct. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71:489–495. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv202.
    1. Varadhan R, Seplaki CL, Xue QL, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP. Stimulus-response paradigm for characterizing the loss of resilience in homeostatic regulation associated with frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:666–670. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.09.013.
    1. Varadhan R, Walston JD, Bandeen-Roche K. Can a Link Be Found Between Physical Resilience and Frailty in Older Adults by Studying Dynamical Systems? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:1455–1458. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15409.
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.
    1. Belloni G, Cesari M. Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity: Two Distinct but Related Constructs. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019;6:133. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00133.
    1. Whitson HE, Cohen HJ, Schmader KE, Morey MC, Kuchel G, Colon-Emeric CS. Physical Resilience: Not Simply the Opposite of Frailty. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018;66:1459–1461. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15233.
    1. P. De Souto Barreto, Guyonnet S, I. Ader, et al. 2020. The INSPIRE research initiative: a program for GeroScience and healthy aging research going from animal models to humans and the healthcare system. doi:10.14283/JFA.2020.18.
    1. Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;110:305–314. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305.
    1. Colón-Emeric C, Pieper CF, Schmader KE, Sloane R, Bloom A, McClain M, Magaziner J, Huffman KM, Orwig D, Crabtree DM, Whitson HE. Two Approaches to Classifying and Quantifying Physical Resilience in Longitudinal Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2019. doi:10.1093/gerona/glz097.
    1. Gijzel SMW, Rector J, van Meulen FB, van der Loeff RS, van de Leemput IA, Scheffer M, Olde Rikkert MGM, Melis RJF. Measurement of Dynamical Resilience Indicators Improves the Prediction of Recovery Following Hospitalization in Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.011.
    1. Gill TM, Robison JT, Tinetti ME. Predictors of Recovery in Activities of Daily Living Among Disabled Older Persons Living in the Community. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:757–762. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07161.x.
    1. Boyd CM, Landefeld CS, Counsell SR, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Kresevic D, Burant C, Covinsky KE. Recovery of activities of daily living in older adults after hospitalization for acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:2171–2179. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02023.x.
    1. Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Bautista JE, García-Hermoso A, Cano CA, Izquierdo M. Reference values for handgrip strength and their association with intrinsic capacity domains among older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10:278–286. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12373.
    1. Medina-Mirapeix F, Bernabeu-Mora R, Sánchez-Martínez MP, Gacto-Sánchez M, Martín San Agustín R, Montilla-Herrador J. Patterns and Predictors of Recovery from Poor Health Status Measured with the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test in Patients with Stable COPD: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019;8:946. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070946.
    1. Gooding PA, Hurst A, Johnson J, Tarrier N. Psychological resilience in young and older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27:262–270. doi: 10.1002/gps.2712.
    1. At J, Bryce R, Prina M, Acosta D, Ferri CP, Guerra M, Huang Y, Rodriguez JJL, Salas A, Sosa AL, Williams JD, Dewey ME, Acosta I, Liu Z, Beard J, Prince M. Frailty and the prediction of dependence and mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a 10/66 population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2015;13:138. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0378-4.
    1. Beard JR, Jotheeswaran AT, Cesari M, Araujo de Carvalho I. The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026119.
    1. Charles A, Buckinx F, Locquet M, Reginster J-Y, Petermans J, Gruslin B, Bruyère O. Prediction of adverse outcomes in nursing home residents according to intrinsic capacity proposed by the World Health Organization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. doi:10.1093/gerona/glz218.
    1. Colón-Emeric C, Whitson HE, Pieper CF, Sloane R, Orwig D, Huffman KM, Bettger JP, Parker D, Crabtree DM, Gruber-Baldini A, Magaziner J. Resiliency Groups Following Hip Fracture in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2019. doi:10.1111/jgs.16152.
    1. Strehler BL, Mildvan AS. General Theory of Mortality and Aging. Science. 1960;132:14–21. doi: 10.1126/science.132.3418.14.
    1. Shock NW. Age changes in some physiologic processes. Geriatrics. 1957;12:40–48.
    1. Sehl ME, Yates FE. Kinetics of human aging: I. Rates of senescence between ages 30 and 70 years in healthy people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:B198–208. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.5.B198.
    1. Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Foley D, Masaki K, Leveille S, Curb JD, White L. Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability. JAMA. 1999;281:558–560. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.558.
    1. Hirsch CH, Bůžková P, Robbins JA, Patel KV, Newman AB. Predicting late-life disability and death by the rate of decline in physical performance measures. Age Ageing. 2012;41:155–161. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr151.
    1. Weibel ER, Taylor CR, Hoppeler H. The concept of symmorphosis: a testable hypothesis of structure-function relationship. PNAS. 1991;88:10357–10361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10357.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner