68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies

Katharina Dendl, Stefan A Koerber, Rebecca Finck, Kgomotso M G Mokoala, Fabian Staudinger, Lisa Schillings, Ulrike Heger, Manuel Röhrich, Clemens Kratochwil, Mike Sathekge, Dirk Jäger, Jürgen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik L Giesel, Katharina Dendl, Stefan A Koerber, Rebecca Finck, Kgomotso M G Mokoala, Fabian Staudinger, Lisa Schillings, Ulrike Heger, Manuel Röhrich, Clemens Kratochwil, Mike Sathekge, Dirk Jäger, Jürgen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik L Giesel

Abstract

Purpose: 68Ga-FAPI (fibroblast activation protein inhibitor) is a novel and highly promising radiotracer for PET/CT imaging. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to explore the potential of FAPI-PET/CT in gynecological malignancies. We assessed biodistribution, tumor uptake, and the influence of pre- or postmenopausal status on tracer accumulation in hormone-sensitive organs. Furthermore, a comparison with the current standard oncological tracer 18F-FDG was performed in selected cases.

Patients and methods: A total of 31 patients (median age 59.5) from two centers with several gynecological tumors (breast cancer; ovarian cancer; cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; leiomyosarcoma of the uterus; tubal cancer) underwent 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT. Out of 31 patients, 10 received an additional 18F-FDG scan within a median time interval of 12.5 days (range 1-76). Tracer uptake was quantified by standardized uptake values (SUV)max and (SUV)mean, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated (SUVmax tumor/ SUVmean organ). Moreover, a second cohort of 167 female patients with different malignancies was analyzed regarding their FAPI uptake in normal hormone-responsive organs: endometrium (n = 128), ovary (n = 64), and breast (n = 147). These patients were categorized by age as premenopausal (<35 years; n = 12), postmenopausal (>65 years; n = 68), and unknown menstrual status (35-65 years; n = 87), followed by an analysis of FAPI uptake of the pre- and postmenopausal group.

Results: In 8 out of 31 patients, the primary tumor was present, and all 31 patients showed lesions suspicious for metastasis (n = 81) demonstrating a high mean SUVmax in both the primary (SUVmax 11.6) and metastatic lesions (SUVmax 9.7). TBR was significantly higher in 68Ga-FAPI compared to 18F-FDG for distant metastases (13.0 vs. 5.7; p = 0.047) and by trend for regional lymph node metastases (31.9 vs 27.3; p = 0.6). Biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT presented significantly lower uptake or no significant differences in 15 out of 16 organs, compared to 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The highest uptake of all primary lesions was obtained in endometrial carcinomas (mean SUVmax 18.4), followed by cervical carcinomas (mean SUVmax 15.22). In the second cohort, uptake in premenopausal patients differed significantly from postmenopausal patients in endometrium (11.7 vs 3.9; p < 0.0001) and breast (1.8 vs 1.0; p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference concerning ovaries (2.8 vs 1.6; p = 0.141) was observed.

Conclusion: Due to high tracer uptake resulting in sharp contrasts in primary and metastatic lesions and higher TBRs than 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT presents a promising imaging method for staging and follow-up of gynecological tumors. The presence or absence of the menstrual cycle seems to correlate with FAPI accumulation in the normal endometrium and breast. This first investigation of FAP ligands in gynecological tumor entities supports clinical application and further research in this field.

Keywords: FAPI; Fibroblast activation protein; Gynecological malignancies; PET; SUV.

Conflict of interest statement

SAK reports grants from Viewray Inc., outside the submitted work.

JD reports grants from Viewray Inc., CRI – The Clinical Research Institute GmbH, Accuray International Sari, RaySearch Laboratories AB, Vision RT Limited, Merck Serono GmbH, Astellas Pharma GmbH, Astra Zeneca GmbH, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Solution Akademie GmbH, Ergomed PLC Surrey Research Park, Quintiles GmbH, Pharmaceutical Research Associates GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&CoKG, PTW-Freiburg Dr. Pychlau GmbH, Nanobiotix S.A, outside the submitted work.

UH, CK, and FG are named in a patent application (EP 18155420.5) for quinolone-based FAP-targeting agents for imaging and therapy in nuclear medicine. CK, UH, and FLG also have shares of a consultancy group for iTheranostics.

All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a PET-based evaluation of the endometrium, breast, and ovary in 167 female patients with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT including various malignancies. b Comparison of FAPI-uptake in endometrium, ovary, and breast premenopausal (n = 12) and postmenopausal (n = 68), categorized by age
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
FAPI uptake in primary and metastatic lesions in 31 female patients with different gynecological tumors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TBRs of regional lymph node metastases and distant metastases by comparing 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
HE staining (a, c) and FAP immunohistochemistry (b,c) of a retroperitoneal metastasis in a patient diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. The neoplastic cells demonstrated high FAP expression [F], while normal moderate expression was depicted by the stroma (d). As the tumor was characterized by a high amount of angiogenesis beforehand, an example is shown in e, demonstrating strong FAP expression, too. [* presents stroma; --- presents neoplastic cells]. The patient presented a high SUVmax of 9.1 in 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT [G], 2 days prior to the biopsy, as well
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Exemplary staining with HE and anti-FAP α monoclonal antibody of a pleural biopsy due to breast cancer. The pleural metastasis, located in the mediastinum, presented a SUVmax of 7.46 in the FAPI-PET/CT 8 months prior to the biopsy (a). The stroma demonstrated markedly strong FAP expression (d), and high-to-moderate expression was observed in neoplastic cells. The depicted cell clusters (b, c) most likely represent tumorous cell nests and demonstrated strong FAP expression as well
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
A 63-year-old woman with metastasized ovarian carcinoma underwent 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT followed by 18F-FDG-PET/CT 1 month later. Tracer uptake in normal liver parenchyma was markedly different in both tracers: 68Ga-FAPI SUVmax 1.38 vs. 18F-FDG SUVmax 4.34. The quantified uptake in two bone metastases and one liver metastasis presented a rather high FAPI-uptake compared to FDG, respectively
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
A 79-year-old female with metastasized breast and colon cancer underwent within 1.5 years eight 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT with three different derivates (FAPI-02, FAPI-04, FAPI-46). During that time interval, mainly palbociclib and four cycles of Y-90-FAPI-radioligand therapy were applied. The progression markers CA 15-3 and CA 19-9 were monitored showing a temporary stable and even regredient disease, which is in concordance with FAPI uptake presented in the PET/CT. However, after a while, the patient possibly developed a resistance against palbociclib or radioligand therapy, presenting with possible progressive disease leading to a change of therapy
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
A 58-year-old female patient presented with cervical cancer for pre-radiotherapeutic staging due to a skull metastasis using 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT. The investigation showed a local relapse with a SUVmax of 14.4. Furthermore, the skull metastasis presented a strong FAPI uptake with a SUVmax of 32.3 enabling precise delineation and radiotherapy planning
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
HE Staining (a) and FAP immunohistochemistry (b) of a high-grade endometrial ovarian adenocarcinoma. Remarkably, the malignant cells (c, d) demonstrated very strong FAP expression (d) compared to presumably uninfiltrated tissue which showed with exception of the stroma scarcely none (e, f) facilitating differentiation between healthy and malignant tissue
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
A 60-year-old patient with metastasized cervical carcinoma underwent 68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT due to monitoring. The local relapse presented a rather strong FAPI uptake with SUVmax 16.90, similar to the exemplary shown liver metastasis in segment II (SUVmax 14.1)

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.
    1. Rahman WT, Wale DJ, Viglianti BL, Townsend DM, Manganaro MS, Gross MD, Wong KK, Rubello D. The impact of infection and inflammation in oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;117:109168. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109168.
    1. Almuhaideb A, Papathanasiou N, Bomanji J. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(1):3–13. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.75771.
    1. Lakhani A, Khan SR, Bharwani N, Stewart V, Rockall AG, Khan S, Barwick TD. FDG PET/CT pitfalls in gynecologic and genitourinary oncologic imaging. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):577–594. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160059.
    1. Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014;8(5–6):454–463. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095.
    1. Gascard P, Tlsty TD. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: orchestrating the composition of malignancy. Genes Dev. 2016;30(9):1002–1019. doi: 10.1101/gad.279737.116.
    1. Barbazán J, Matic VD. Cancer associated fibroblasts: is the force the path to the dark side? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;56:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.09.002.
    1. Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(18):7235–7239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7235.
    1. Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, Debus J, Altmann A, Jäger D, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Barthe P, Roumestand C, Haberkorn U. A tumor-imaging method targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1423–1429. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210435.
    1. Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Schlittenhardt J, Dendl K, Eiber M et al. Head-to-head intra individual comparison of biodistribution and tumor uptake of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;in print.
    1. Koerber SA, Finck R, Dendl K, et al. Novel FAP ligands enable improved imaging contrast in sarcoma patients due to FAPI-PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05374-4.
    1. Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, Röhrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK, Marme F, Lang M, Kauczor HU, Jäger D, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Giesel FL. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer. J Nucl Med: official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2019;60(6):801–805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967.
    1. Meyer C, Dahlbom M, Lindner T, Vauclin S, Mona C, Slavik R, Czernin J, Haberkorn U, Calais J. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET imaging in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(8):1171–1177. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236786.
    1. Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, Marschalek MM, Loktev A, Lehnert W, Debus J, Jäger D, Flechsig P, Altmann A, Mier W, Haberkorn U. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):386–392. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.215913.
    1. Giesel F, Adeberg S, Syed M, Lindner T, Jimenez LD, Mavriopoulou E, Staudinger F, Tonndorf-Martini E, Regnery S, Rieken S, ElShafie R, Röhrich M, Flechsig P, Kluge A, Altmann A, Debus J, Haberkorn UA, Kratochwil C. FAPI-74 PET/CT using either 18F-AlF or Cold-kit 68Ga-labeling: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and tumor delineation in lung cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2020:jnumed.120.245084. 10.2967/jnumed.120.245084.
    1. Syed M, Flechsig P, Liermann J, Windisch P, Staudinger F, Akbaba S, Koerber SA, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert PK, Debus J, Giesel F, Haberkorn U, Adeberg S. Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET for diagnostics and advanced targeted radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(12):2836–2845. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04859-y.
    1. Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Jäger D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1415–1422. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210443.
    1. Noci I, Borri P, Scarselli G, Chieffi O, Bucciantini S, Biagiotti R, Paglierani M, Moncini D, Taddei G. Morphological and functional aspects of the endometrium of asymptomatic post-menopausal women: does the endometrium really age? Hum Reprod. 1996;11(10):2246–2250. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019084.
    1. Heller SL, Young Lin LL, Melsaether AN, Moy L, Gao Y. Hormonal effects on breast density, Fibroglandular tissue, and background parenchymal enhancement. Radiographics. 2018;38(4):983–996. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180035.
    1. Costa A, Kieffer Y, Scholer-Dahirel A, Pelon F, Bourachot B, Cardon M, Sirven P, Magagna I, Fuhrmann L, Bernard C, Bonneau C, Kondratova M, Kuperstein I, Zinovyev A, Givel AM, Parrini MC, Soumelis V, Vincent-Salomon A, Mechta-Grigoriou F. Fibroblast heterogeneity and immunosuppressive environment in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(3):463–479.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.011.
    1. Gao MQ, Kim BG, Kang S, Choi YP, Park H, Kang KS, Cho NH. Stromal fibroblasts from the interface zone of human breast carcinomas induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like state in breast cancer cells in vitro. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 20):3507–3514. doi: 10.1242/jcs.072900.
    1. Gierach GL, Brinton LA, Sherman ME. Lobular involution, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: visualizing the future? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(22):1685–1687. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq433.
    1. Landgren BM, Collins A, Csemiczky G, Burger HG, Baksheev L, Robertson DM. Menopause transition: annual changes in serum hormonal patterns over the menstrual cycle in women during a nine-year period prior to menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2763–2769. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030824.
    1. Burton A, Maskarinec G, Perez-Gomez B, Vachon C, Miao H, Lajous M, López-Ridaura R, Rice M, Pereira A, Garmendia ML, Tamimi RM, Bertrand K, Kwong A, Ursin G, Lee E, Qureshi SA, Ma H, Vinnicombe S, Moss S, Allen S, Ndumia R, Vinayak S, Teo SH, Mariapun S, Fadzli F, Peplonska B, Bukowska A, Nagata C, Stone J, Hopper J, Giles G, Ozmen V, Aribal ME, Schüz J, Van Gils CH, Wanders JOP, Sirous R, Sirous M, Hipwell J, Kim J, Lee JW, Dickens C, Hartman M, Chia KS, Scott C, Chiarelli AM, Linton L, Pollan M, Flugelman AA, Salem D, Kamal R, Boyd N, Dos-Santos-Silva I, McCormack V. Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide. PLoS Med. 2017;14(6):e1002335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335.
    1. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de las Heras P, Lerma E. Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl 1):S101–S124. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075505.
    1. Dendl K, Koerber SA, Adeberg S, et al. Physiological FAP-activation in a postpartum woman observed in oncological FAPI-PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
    1. Sonni I, Lee-Felker S, Memarzadeh S, Quinn MM, Mona CE, Lückerath K, et al. 68Ga-FAPi-46 diffuse bilateral breast uptake in a patient with cervical cancer after hormonal stimulation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. 10.1007/s00259-020-04947-z.
    1. Jin X, Iwasa S, Okada K, Mitsumata M, Ooi A. Expression patterns of seprase, a membrane serine protease, in cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(4):3195–3198.
    1. Lai D, Ma L, Wang F. Fibroblast activation protein regulates tumor-associated fibroblasts and epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41(2):541–550. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1475.
    1. Hussain A, Voisin V, Poon S, Karamboulas C, Bui NHB, Meens J, Dmytryshyn J, Ho VW, Tang KH, Paterson J, Clarke BA, Bernardini MQ, Bader GD, Neel BG, Ailles LE. Distinct fibroblast functional states drive clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer and are regulated by TCF21. J Exp Med. 2020;217(8):e20191094. doi: 10.1084/jem.20191094.
    1. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Yan L, Sharifian M, Ren X, Liu S, Kim G, Gayther SA, Pejovic T, Lawrenson K. Stromal expression of fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) predicts platinum resistance and shorter recurrence in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Microenviron. 2015;8(1):23–31. doi: 10.1007/s12307-014-0153-7.
    1. Li M, Cheng X, Rong R, Gao Y, Tang X, Chen Y. High expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) predicts poor outcome in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07541-6.
    1. Adam JA, Loft A, Chargari C, Delgado Bolton RC, Kidd E, Schöder H, et al. EANM/SNMMI practice guideline for [18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiotherapy treatment planning in uterine cervical cancer v1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. 10.1007/s00259-020-05112-2.
    1. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.009.
    1. Jung YY, Lee YK, Koo JS. Expression of cancer-associated fibroblast-related proteins in adipose stroma of breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(11):8685–8695. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3594-9.
    1. Jia J, Martin TA, Ye L, Jiang WG. FAP-α (Fibroblast activation protein-α) is involved in the control of human breast cancer cell line growth and motility via the FAK pathway. BMC Cell Biol. 2014;15:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-15-16.
    1. Zhang MZ, Qiao YH, Nesland JM, Trope C, Kennedy A, Chen WT, Suo ZH. Expression of seprase in effusions from patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Chin Med J. 2007;120(8):663–668. doi: 10.1097/00029330-200704020-00010.
    1. Zhang M, Xu L, Wang X, Sun B, Ding J. Expression levels of seprase/FAPα and DPPIV/CD26 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(1):34–42. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3151.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner