Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study

Emma J Schneider, Louise Ada, Natasha A Lannin, Emma J Schneider, Louise Ada, Natasha A Lannin

Abstract

Background: There is a need to provide a large amount of extra practice on top of usual rehabilitation to adults after stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine if it is feasible to add extra upper limb practice to usual inpatient rehabilitation and whether it is likely to improve upper limb activity and grip strength.

Method: A prospective, single-group, pre- and post-test study was carried out. Twenty adults with upper limb activity limitations who had some movement in the upper limb completed an extra hour of upper limb practice, 6 days per week for 4 weeks. Feasibility was measured by examining recruitment, intervention (adherence, efficiency, acceptability, safety) and measurement. Clinical outcomes were upper limb activity (Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test) and grip strength (dynamometry) measured at baseline (week 0) and end of intervention (week 4).

Results: Of the 212 people who were screened, 42 (20%) were eligible and 20 (9%) were enrolled. Of the 20 participants, 12 (60%) completed the 4-week program; 7 (35%) were discharged early, and 1 (5%) withdrew. Participants attended 342 (85%) of the possible 403 sessions and practiced for 324 (95%) of the total 342 h. In terms of safety, there were no study-related adverse events. Participants increased 0.29 blocks/s (95% CI 0.19 to 0.39) on the Box and Block Test, 0.20 pegs/s (95% CI 0.10 to 0.30) on the Nine-Hole Peg Test, and 4.4 kg (95% CI 2.9 to 5.9) in grip strength, from baseline to end of intervention.

Conclusions: It appears feasible for adults who are undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and have some upper limb movement after stroke to undertake an hour of extra upper limb practice. The magnitude of the clinical outcomes suggests that further investigation is warranted and this study provides useful information for the design of a phase II randomized trial.

Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12615000665538).

Keywords: Occupational therapy; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Task-specific motor training.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interest.

© The Author(s). 2019.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram showing the design and flow of participants through each stage of the study

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Stroke and its management in Australia: an update. In: Australian Government Department of Health, editor. Cardiovascular disease series 37. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2013.
    1. Geyh Szilvia, Cieza Alarcos, Schouten Jan, Dickson Hugh, Frommelt Peter, Omar Zaliha, Kostanjsek Nenad, Ring Haim, Stucki Gerold. ICF Core Sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2004;36(0):135–141. doi: 10.1080/16501960410016776.
    1. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation: optimising motor performance. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann; 2003.
    1. Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2053–2058. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695.
    1. Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Australia 2010. Available from: .
    1. Dean C, Mackey F. Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. Aust J Physiother. 1992;38(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60548-1.
    1. Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(20):1213–1223. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075717.
    1. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987.
    1. Veerbeek JM, Koolstra M, Ket JC, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Effects of augmented exercise therapy on outcome of gait and gait-related activities in the first 6 months after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2011;42(11):3311–3315. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.623819.
    1. Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, Schmidt J. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016;62(4):182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.006.
    1. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, Garber SL, Van der Loos HF, Kenney D, et al. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of veterans affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):445–458. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0062.
    1. Cooke EV, Tallis RC, Clark A, Pomeroy VM. Efficacy of functional strength training on restoration of lower-limb motor function early after stroke: phase I randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(1):88–96. doi: 10.1177/1545968309343216.
    1. Donaldson C, Tallis R, Miller S, Sunderland A, Lemon R, Pomeroy V. Effects of conventional physical therapy and functional strength training on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: a randomized phase II study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):389–397. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326635.
    1. GAPS Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(5):529–537. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr768oa.
    1. Han C, Wang Q, Meng PP, Qi MZ. Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(1):75–81. doi: 10.1177/0269215512447223.
    1. Kim M, Cho K, Lee W. Community walking training program improves walking function and social participation in chronic stroke patients. The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine. 2014;234(4):281–286. doi: 10.1620/tjem.234.281.
    1. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):191–196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X.
    1. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(3):573–579. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.3.573.
    1. Partridge C, Mackenzie M, Edwards S, Reid A, Jayawardena S, Guck N, et al. Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2000;5(4):230–240. doi: 10.1002/pri.203.
    1. Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, Wood R, McNamee P, Fearon T, et al. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(6):579–589. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr652oa.
    1. Ross LF, Harvey LA, Lannin NA. Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(6):492–503. doi: 10.1177/0269215508101733.
    1. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2123–2128. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544585.
    1. Hijmans JM, Hale LA, Satherley JA, McMillan NJ, King MJ. Bilateral upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke using a movement-based game controller. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):1005–1013. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0109.
    1. Thomson K, Pollock A, Bugge C, Brady M. Commercial gaming devices for stroke upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(4):479–488. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12263.
    1. English C, Bernhardt J, Crotty M, Esterman A, Segal L, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy or seven-day week therapy for increasing rehabilitation intensity of therapy after stroke (CIRCIT): a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(4):594–602. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12470.
    1. Page SJ, Levin L, Hermann V, Dunning K, Levine P. Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task-specific practice in moderately impaired stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(2):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.016.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–391. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386.
    1. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Testing and Function. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology. 1973;23(6):658–664. doi: 10.1212/WNL.23.6.658.
    1. Gracies JM, Marosszeky JE, Renton R, Sandanam J, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Short-term effects of dynamic lycra splints on upper limb in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12):1547–1555. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16346.
    1. Turner-Stokes L, Scott H, Williams H, Siegert R. The rehabilitation complexity scale--extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):715–720. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.615880.
    1. Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):435–440. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331146.
    1. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;5(1):24–38. doi: 10.1177/153944928500500102.
    1. Horowitz BP, Tollin R, Cassidy G. Collection of normative data with community dwelling elders. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 1997;15(1):53–64.
    1. Tickle-Degnen L. Nuts and bolts of conducting feasibility studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(2):171–176. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006270.
    1. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
    1. Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, Bohannon RW, Hill CL. Hand Grip Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:127.
    1. Kwakkel Gert, Kollen Boudewijn, Twisk Jos. Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2348–2353. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e.
    1. Stanton Rosalyn, Ada Louise, Dean Catherine M., Preston Elisabeth. Effect of information feedback on training standing up following stroke: a pilot feasibility study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2016;23(6):413–419. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1170322.
    1. Bower Kelly J, Clark Ross A, McGinley Jennifer L, Martin Clarissa L, Miller Kimberly J. Clinical feasibility of the Nintendo Wii™ for balance training post-stroke: a phase II randomized controlled trial in an inpatient setting. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2014;28(9):912–923. doi: 10.1177/0269215514527597.
    1. Lannin NA, Ada L, Levy T, English C, Ratcliffe J, Sindhusake D, et al. Intensive therapy after botulinum toxin in adults with spasticity after stroke versus botulinum toxin alone or therapy alone: a pilot, feasibility randomized trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:82.
    1. Stinear Cathy M., Byblow Winston D., Ackerley Suzanne J., Smith Marie-Claire, Borges Victor M., Barber P. Alan. Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke. Stroke. 2017;48(3):795–798. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner