Clubfoot treatment in 2015: a global perspective

Rosalind M Owen, Beth Capper, Christopher Lavy, Rosalind M Owen, Beth Capper, Christopher Lavy

Abstract

Introduction: Clubfoot affects around 174 000 children born annually, with approximately 90% of these in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC). Untreated clubfoot causes life-long impairment, affecting individuals' ability to walk and participate in society. The minimally invasive Ponseti treatment is highly effective and has grown in acceptance globally. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to quantify the numbers of countries providing services for clubfoot and children accessing these.

Method: In 2015-2016, expected cases of clubfoot were calculated for all countries, using an incidence rate of 1.24/1000 births. Informants were sought from all LMIC, and participants completed a standardised survey about services for clubfoot in their countries in 2015. Data collected were analysed using simple numerical analysis, country coverage levels, trends over time and by income group. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results: Responses were received from 55 countries, in which 79% of all expected cases of clubfoot were born. More than 24 000 children with clubfoot were enrolled for Ponseti treatment in 2015. Coverage was less than 25% in the majority of countries. There were higher levels of response and coverage within the lowest income country group. 31 countries reported a national programme for clubfoot, with the majority provided through public-private partnerships.

Conclusion: This is the first study to describe global provision of, and access to, treatment services for children with clubfoot. The numbers of children accessing Ponseti treatment for clubfoot in LMIC has risen steadily since 2005. However, coverage remains low, and we estimate that less than 15% of children born with clubfoot in LMIC start treatment. More action to promote the rollout of national clubfoot programmes, build capacity for treatment and enable access and adherence to treatment in order to radically increase coverage and effectiveness is essential and urgent in order to prevent permanent disability caused by clubfoot.

Keywords: cross-sectional survey; health systems; orthopedic surgery; paediatrics; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Responding countries grouped by coverage level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of children enrolled in 2005–2015 in 14 LMIC countries.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analysis by country income level.

References

    1. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. a thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1477–89. 10.2106/00004623-199510000-00002
    1. Hosseinzadeh P, Kiebzak GM, Dolan L, et al. . Management of clubfoot relapses with the ponseti method: results of a survey of the posna members. J Pediatr Orthop 2017. 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000953
    1. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, et al. . Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 2004;113:376–80. 10.1542/peds.113.2.376
    1. Church C, Coplan JA, Poljak D, et al. . A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms. J Child Orthop 2012;6:51–9. 10.1007/s11832-012-0387-1
    1. Owen RM, Kembhavi G. A critical review of interventions for clubfoot in low and middle-income countries: effectiveness and contextual influences. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012;21:59–67. 10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283499264
    1. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:448–54. 10.2106/00004623-199274030-00021
    1. Digge V, Desai J, Das S. Expanded age indication for ponseti method for correction of congenital idiopathic talipes equinovarus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2018;57:155–8. 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.015
    1. Pirani S, Naddumba E, Mathias R, et al. . Towards effective ponseti clubfoot care: the uganda sustainable clubfoot care project. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1154–63. 10.1007/s11999-009-0759-0
    1. Owen RM, Penny JN, Mayo A, et al. . A collaborative public health approach to clubfoot intervention in 10 low-income and middle-income countries: 2-year outcomes and lessons learnt. J Pediatr Orthop B 2012;21:361–5. 10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283504006
    1. Shabtai L, Specht SC, Herzenberg JE. Worldwide spread of the Ponseti method for clubfoot. World J Orthop 2014;5:585 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.585
    1. Smythe T, Kuper H, Macleod D, et al. . Birth prevalence of congenital talipes equinovarus in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health 2017;22:269–85. 10.1111/tmi.12833
    1. Population, total | Data. (cited 7 Feb 2018).
    1. Country WB. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. (cited 2018 Feb 7).
    1. Bracing Tips. Ponseti International. (cited 2018 Feb 7).
    1. Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, et al. . Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1164–70. 10.1007/s11999-008-0600-1

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner