Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate

Josef S Smolen, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Stefan Florentinus, Su Chen, Jessica L Suboticki, Arthur Kavanaugh, Josef S Smolen, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Stefan Florentinus, Su Chen, Jessica L Suboticki, Arthur Kavanaugh

Abstract

Objectives: Methotrexate is considered to be first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a substantial proportion of treated patients do not achieve the desired goals of therapy. This analysis aimed to identify predictors of insufficient response to methotrexate in patients with early RA.

Methods: The Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation with Methotrexate and Adalimumab (OPTIMA) and PREMIER studies in patients with RA for <1 and <3 years, respectively, examined the efficacy of methotrexate and adalimumab in methotrexate-naive patients. This post hoc analysis included patients for whom initial methotrexate monotherapy was not successful after 6 months. Candidate predictors of insufficient response and clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP) included demographics, baseline disease characteristics and time-averaged disease variables over a 12-week interval. In OPTIMA, adalimumab was added to therapy after insufficient treatment response; in PREMIER, initial methotrexate therapy was continued; clinical, functional and radiologic outcomes were assessed after 1 year.

Results: Baseline 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)) and time-averaged DAS28(CRP) over 4, 8 and 12 weeks were the strongest predictors of insufficient response to methotrexate and CRRP. Addition of adalimumab to methotrexate therapy was associated with better clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after 1 year compared with continuing on methotrexate monotherapy.

Conclusions: In patients with early RA, baseline disease characteristics and early disease activity can predict response to methotrexate treatment and radiographic progression at 6 months. The addition of adalimumab at 6 months after methotrexate failure is associated with improved outcomes. These results support treatment-to-target strategies and timely adaptation of therapy in patients with early RA.

Trial registration number: NCT00420927, NCT00195663; Post-results.

Keywords: anti-TNF; methotrexate; rheumatoid arthritis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JSS and AK provided remunerated expert advice to and received grant/research support for his institution from AbbVie. RFvV has received grants and research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Roche and UCB; and consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Vertex. SF, SC and JLS are employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or stock options.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Backward logistic regression analysis of baseline predictors, including DAS28(CRP), of insufficient response to methotrexate at 6 months (A) and CRRP at 6 months (B) in patients with early RA receiving methotrexate monotherapy. Insufficient response to methotrexate was defined as not achieving DAS28(CRP) 1.5 from baseline to week 26 (OPTIMA study) or week 24 (PREMIER study). Predictors analysis considered 500 methotrexate insufficient responders and 156 methotrexate responders; CRRP analysis considered 481 patients without CRRP and 163 patients with CRRP. The OR for each continuous variable (age, BMI, CRP at BL, DAS28 at BL, mTSS, PGA at BL, Pt Pain at BL, RF and weight) reflects the effect of a 1-unit change in that variable; thus, the ORs differ partly because of the different relative meaning of a 1-unit change, such as for DAS28 (scale, about 1–10) compared with SDAI (scale, 0 to about 86). The full regression models, before elimination of factors with p≥0.1, included age, race (white vs non-white), sex (male vs female), weight, RA duration, RF, BMI and mTSS; BL values for CRP, tender joint count based on 68 joints, swollen joint count based on 66 joints, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, Pt Pain, Pt Global Assessment of Disease Activity on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, PGA and DAS28; and prior use of DMARDs (yes vs no), number of prior DMARDs and prior use of GCs (yes vs no). *P

Figure 2

Backward logistic regression analysis of…

Figure 2

Backward logistic regression analysis of baseline and postbaseline predictors, including DAS28(CRP), of insufficient…

Figure 2
Backward logistic regression analysis of baseline and postbaseline predictors, including DAS28(CRP), of insufficient response to methotrexate at 6 months (A) and CRRP at 6 months (B) based on data from weeks 0–4, weeks 0–8 and weeks 0–12 in patients with early RA receiving methotrexate monotherapy. Week 4 analysis considered 485 methotrexate insufficient responders and 151 methotrexate responders, week 8 analysis considered 507 methotrexate insufficient responders and 160 methotrexate responders and week 12 analysis considered 500 methotrexate insufficient responders and 156 methotrexate responders. Week 4 analysis considered 471 patients without CRRP and 153 patients with CRRP, week 8 analysis considered 491 patients without CRRP and 163 patients with CRRP and week 12 analysis considered 481 patients without CRRP and 163 patients with CRRP. Insufficient response to methotrexate was defined as not achieving DAS28(CRP) 1.5 from baseline to week 26 (OPTIMA study) or week 24 (PREMIER study). The OR for each continuous variable (age, BMI, mTSS, RF, TA-CRP, TA-DAS28, TA-PGA, TA-Pt Pain, TA-PtGA, TA-TJC68, weight) reflects the effect of a 1-unit change in that variable; thus, the ORs differ partly because of the different relative meaning of a 1-unit change, such as for DAS28 (scale, about 1–10) compared with SDAI (scale, 0 to about 86). The full regression models, before elimination of factors with p≥0.1, included age, race (white vs non-white), sex (male vs female), weight, RA duration, RF, BMI and mTSS; TA values for CRP, TJC68, swollen joint count based on 66 joints, HAQ-DI, Pt Pain, PtGA, PGA and DAS28; and prior use of DMARDs (yes vs no), number of prior DMARDs and prior use of GCs (yes vs no). *P
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:960–77. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, et al. . 2015 American college of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1–26. - PubMed
    1. Lindqvist E, Jonsson K, Saxne T, et al. . Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:611–6. 10.1136/ard.62.7.611 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rezaei H, Saevarsdottir S, Forslind K, et al. . In early rheumatoid arthritis, patients with a good initial response to methotrexate have excellent 2-year clinical outcomes, but radiological progression is not fully prevented: data from the methotrexate responders population in the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:186–91. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, et al. . Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1063–74. 10.1002/art.21655 - DOI - PubMed
Show all 33 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2
Figure 2
Backward logistic regression analysis of baseline and postbaseline predictors, including DAS28(CRP), of insufficient response to methotrexate at 6 months (A) and CRRP at 6 months (B) based on data from weeks 0–4, weeks 0–8 and weeks 0–12 in patients with early RA receiving methotrexate monotherapy. Week 4 analysis considered 485 methotrexate insufficient responders and 151 methotrexate responders, week 8 analysis considered 507 methotrexate insufficient responders and 160 methotrexate responders and week 12 analysis considered 500 methotrexate insufficient responders and 156 methotrexate responders. Week 4 analysis considered 471 patients without CRRP and 153 patients with CRRP, week 8 analysis considered 491 patients without CRRP and 163 patients with CRRP and week 12 analysis considered 481 patients without CRRP and 163 patients with CRRP. Insufficient response to methotrexate was defined as not achieving DAS28(CRP) 1.5 from baseline to week 26 (OPTIMA study) or week 24 (PREMIER study). The OR for each continuous variable (age, BMI, mTSS, RF, TA-CRP, TA-DAS28, TA-PGA, TA-Pt Pain, TA-PtGA, TA-TJC68, weight) reflects the effect of a 1-unit change in that variable; thus, the ORs differ partly because of the different relative meaning of a 1-unit change, such as for DAS28 (scale, about 1–10) compared with SDAI (scale, 0 to about 86). The full regression models, before elimination of factors with p≥0.1, included age, race (white vs non-white), sex (male vs female), weight, RA duration, RF, BMI and mTSS; TA values for CRP, TJC68, swollen joint count based on 66 joints, HAQ-DI, Pt Pain, PtGA, PGA and DAS28; and prior use of DMARDs (yes vs no), number of prior DMARDs and prior use of GCs (yes vs no). *P

References

    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:960–77. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715
    1. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, et al. . 2015 American college of rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1–26.
    1. Lindqvist E, Jonsson K, Saxne T, et al. . Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:611–6. 10.1136/ard.62.7.611
    1. Rezaei H, Saevarsdottir S, Forslind K, et al. . In early rheumatoid arthritis, patients with a good initial response to methotrexate have excellent 2-year clinical outcomes, but radiological progression is not fully prevented: data from the methotrexate responders population in the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:186–91. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200038
    1. van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, et al. . Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1063–74. 10.1002/art.21655
    1. Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, et al. . The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:26–37. 10.1002/art.21519
    1. Vastesaeger N, Xu S, Aletaha D, et al. . A pilot risk model for the prediction of rapid radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2009;48:1114–21. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep155
    1. Kavanaugh A, Fleischmann RM, Emery P, et al. . Clinical, functional and radiographic consequences of achieving stable low disease activity and remission with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone in early rheumatoid arthritis: 26-week results from the randomised, controlled OPTIMA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:64–71. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201247
    1. Smolen JS, Emery P, Fleischmann R, et al. . Adjustment of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of achievement of stable low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: the randomised controlled OPTIMA trial. Lancet 2014;383:321–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61751-1
    1. Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, et al. . Longterm effect of delaying combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in patients with aggressive early rheumatoid arthritis: 10-year efficacy and safety of adalimumab from the randomized controlled PREMIER trial with open-label extension. J Rheumatol 2014;41:5–14. 10.3899/jrheum.130543
    1. Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, et al. . Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient’s perspective. J Rheumatol 1993;20:557–60.
    1. van der Kooij SM, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, et al. . Limited efficacy of conventional DMARDs after initial methotrexate failure in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1356–62. 10.1136/ard.2006.066662
    1. Moreland LW, O’Dell JR, Paulus HE, et al. . A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2824–35. 10.1002/art.34498
    1. Aletaha D, Funovits J, Keystone EC, et al. . Disease activity early in the course of treatment predicts response to therapy after one year in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:3226–35. 10.1002/art.22943
    1. Romão VC, Canhão H, Fonseca JE. Old drugs, old problems: where do we stand in prediction of rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to methotrexate and other synthetic DMARDs? BMC Med 2013;11:17 10.1186/1741-7015-11-17
    1. Curtis JR, Luijtens K, Kavanaugh A. Predicting future response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients: features at 12 weeks associated with low disease activity at 1 year. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:658–67. 10.1002/acr.21600
    1. van der Heijde D, Keystone EC, Curtis JR, et al. . Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial. J Rheumatol 2012;39:1326–33. 10.3899/jrheum.111171
    1. Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Optimisation of a treat-to-target approach in rheumatoid arthritis: strategies for the 3-month time point. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:1479–85. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208324
    1. Bombardier C, Chen M, Li X, et al. . A risk model for the prediction of radiographic progression: results from SONORA study. J Rheumatol 2010;61:1281.
    1. Fautrel B, Granger B, Combe B, et al. . Matrix to predict rapid radiographic progression of early rheumatoid arthritis patients from the community treated with methotrexate or leflunomide: results from the ESPOIR cohort. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:R249 10.1186/ar4092
    1. Visser K, Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, et al. . A matrix risk model for the prediction of rapid radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving different dynamic treatment strategies: post hoc analyses from the BeSt study. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1333–7. 10.1136/ard.2009.121160
    1. Smolen JS, Van Der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, et al. . Predictors of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with high-dose methotrexate with or without concomitant infliximab: results from the ASPIRE trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:702–10. 10.1002/art.21678
    1. Amos RS, Constable TJ, Crockson RA, et al. . Rheumatoid arthritis: relation of serum C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rates to radiographic changes. Br Med J 1977;1:195–7. 10.1136/bmj.1.6055.195
    1. Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, Duffy J. Clinical responses during gold therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Changes in synovitis, radiologically detectable erosive lesions, serum proteins, and serologic abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:540–9. 10.1002/art.1780250508
    1. Möttönen TT. Prediction of erosiveness and rate of development of new erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1988;47:648–53. 10.1136/ard.47.8.648
    1. van Leeuwen MA, van der Heijde DM, van Rijswijk MH, et al. . Interrelationship of outcome measures and process variables in early rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of radiologic damage, physical disability, joint counts, and acute phase reactants. J Rheumatol 1994;21:425–9.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Wells AF. Benefits and risks of low-dose glucocorticoid treatment in the patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2014;53:1742–51. 10.1093/rheumatology/keu135
    1. Saevarsdottir S, Wallin H, Seddighzadeh M, et al. . Predictors of response to methotrexate in early DMARD naive rheumatoid arthritis: results from the initial open-label phase of the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:469–75. 10.1136/ard.2010.139212
    1. Wessels JA, van der Kooij SM, le Cessie S, et al. . A clinical pharmacogenetic model to predict the efficacy of methotrexate monotherapy in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1765–75. 10.1002/art.22640
    1. Joo YB, Bang SY, Ryu JA, et al. . Predictors of severe radiographic progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective observational cohort study. Int J Rheum Dis 2017;20:1437–46. 10.1111/1756-185X.13054
    1. Baker JF, Ostergaard M, George M, et al. . Greater body mass independently predicts less radiographic progression on X-ray and MRI over 1-2 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1923–8. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205544
    1. Smolen JS, Bu X, Wang X, et al. . Characteristics of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who have a delayed response to treatment with methotrexate in monotherapy or in combination with adalimumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69(suppl 10 abstr 1419).
    1. Griffiths B, Situnayake RD, Clark B, et al. . Racial origin and its effect on disease expression and HLA-DRB1 types in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a matched cross-sectional study. Rheumatology 2000;39:857–64. 10.1093/rheumatology/39.8.857

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner