Sedation during bronchoscopy: data from a nationwide sedation and monitoring survey

Thomas Gaisl, Daniel J Bratton, Ludwig T Heuss, Malcolm Kohler, Christian Schlatzer, Marco P Zalunardo, Martin Frey, Daniel Franzen, Thomas Gaisl, Daniel J Bratton, Ludwig T Heuss, Malcolm Kohler, Christian Schlatzer, Marco P Zalunardo, Martin Frey, Daniel Franzen

Abstract

Background: There is limited knowledge on practice patterns in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA), the use of propofol, and monitoring during flexible bronchoscopy (FB). The purpose of this study was to assess the current practice patterns of FBs and to focus on the use of propofol, the education of the proceduralist, and the involvement of anaesthesiologists during FB.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 299 pulmonologists. Only respondents who were active physicians in adult respiratory medicine performing FB were subsequently analysed.

Results: The response rate was 78 % and 27,149 FB in the previous 12 months were analysed. The overall sedation-related morbidity rate was 0.02 % and mortality was 7/100'000 FB. Sedation was used in 95 % of bronchoscopies. The main drugs used for PSA were propofol (77 %) and midazolam (46 %). In 84 % of PSAs propofol was used without the attendance of an anaesthesiologist. The use of propofol was associated with high volume bronchoscopists (p < 0.010) and career-young pulmonologists (p < 0.001). While monitoring vital parameters has become standard practice, pulmonologists reported a very low rate of systematic basic education and training in the field of PSA (50 %).

Conclusions: In Switzerland, PSA during FB is mostly performed with propofol without the attendance of an anaesthesiologist and the use of this drug is expected to increase in the future. While monitoring standards are very high there is need for policies to improve education, systematic training, and support for pulmonologists for PSA during FB.

Keywords: Bronchoscopy; Education; Midazolam; Propofol; Sedation; Survey.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow chart of the study. An overall response rate of 78 % was achieved by the use of online questionnaires and reminders (hardcopies on paper) sent via post
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Background and Education. a Professional background of the participants. Part-time employment was considered in the analysis. b Methods of education & training of Swiss pulmonologists in flexible bronchoscopy. Multiple answers were possible
Fig 3
Fig 3
Sedatives a Frequency of sedatives/hypnotics used for flexible bronchoscopies by survey participants. Sedatives/hypnotics in general were used in a median of 100 % (IQR 90–100) of flexible bronchoscopies. 77 % of respondents reported the use of propofol on a regular basis (either mono or combination therapy). The most common mono therapy was propofol (47 %) and the most common combination therapy was propofol + codein (11 %, data not shown). Combination therapy included the combination of two or more drugs. b Network plot of drug combinations. The relative size of the circles/bars represents the frequency of the usage/combination. Combination patterns ≤5 % are not labelled. Combination patterns are shown in % of all possible combinations. IQR = Interquartile range
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Propofol and career-age. Box plot summarising the career-age of pulmonologists either not using propofol or using it alone or in combination. Career-young pulmonologists were more likely to use propofol (either mono or in combination) for procedural sedation and analgesia of their flexible bronchoscopy-patients. The career-age was determined by the year of board certification as specialist/consultant (by the Swiss Medical Association [FMH]). ** p < 0.001

References

    1. Panchabhai TS, Mehta AC. Historical perspectives of bronchoscopy. Connecting the dots. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(5):631–641. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201502-089PS.
    1. Ni YL, Lo YL, Lin TY, Fang YF, Kuo HP. Conscious sedation reduces patient discomfort and improves satisfaction in flexible bronchoscopy. Chang Gung Med J. 2010;33(4):443–452.
    1. Putinati S, Ballerin L, Corbetta L, Trevisani L, Potena A. Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for bronchoscopy. Chest. 1999;115(5):1437–1440. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1437.
    1. Silvestri GA, Vincent BD, Wahidi MM, Robinette E, Hansbrough JR, Downie GH. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium injection for moderate sedation in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. Chest. 2009;135(1):41–47. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0623.
    1. Smyth CM, Stead RJ. Survey of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the United Kingdom. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(3):458–463. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00103702.
    1. Dang D, Robinson PC, Winnicki S, Jersmann HP. The safety of flexible fibre-optic bronchoscopy and proceduralist-administered sedation: a tertiary referral centre experience. Intern Med J. 2012;42(3):300–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02261.x.
    1. Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax. 2013;68(Suppl 1):i1–i44. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203618.
    1. Wahidi MM, Jain P, Jantz M, Lee P, Mackensen GB, Barbour SY, et al. American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the use of topical anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in adult patients. Chest. 2011;140(5):1342–1350. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3361.
    1. Wood-Baker R, Burdon J, McGregor A, Robinson P, Seal P, Thoracic Society of A et al. Fibre-optic bronchoscopy in adults: a position paper of The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J. 2001;31(8):479–487. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2001.00104.x.
    1. Jose RJ, Shaefi S, Navani N. Anesthesia for bronchoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(4):453–457. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000087.
    1. Grendelmeier P, Kurer G, Pflimlin E, Tamm M, Stolz D. Feasibility and safety of propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13248.
    1. Hassan C, Rex DK, Cooper GS, Benamouzig R. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44(5):456–464. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1308936.
    1. Pickles J, Jeffrey M, Datta A, Jeffrey AA. Is preparation for bronchoscopy optimal? Eur Respir J. 2003;22(2):203–206. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00118302.
    1. Webb ST, Hunter DN. Is sedation by non-anaesthetists really safe? Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):136–138. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet105.
    1. Kulling D, Rothenbuhler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy. 2003;35(8):679–682. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41518.
    1. Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy. 1994;26(2):231–234. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1008949.
    1. Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy. 2005;37(2):161–166. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826143.
    1. Gupta AA, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Singh N, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, et al. Indications for performing flexible bronchoscopy: Trends over 34 years at a tertiary care hospital. Lung India. 2015;32(3):211–215. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.156213.
    1. Jin F, Mu D, Chu D, Fu E, Xie Y, Liu T. Severe complications of bronchoscopy. Respiration. 2008;76(4):429–433. doi: 10.1159/000151656.
    1. Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation: from the exception to standard practice. Sedation and monitoring trends over 20 years. Endoscopy. 2012;44(5):504–511. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291668.
    1. Stolz D, Kurer G, Meyer A, Chhajed PN, Pflimlin E, Strobel W, et al. Propofol versus combined sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(5):1024–1030. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00180808.
    1. Clarkson K, Power CK, O’Connell F, Pathmakanthan S, Burke CM. A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1993;104(4):1029–1031. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.4.1029.
    1. Clark G, Licker M, Younossian AB, Soccal PM, Frey JG, Rochat T, et al. Titrated sedation with propofol or midazolam for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised trial. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(6):1277–1283. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00142108.
    1. Crawford M, Pollock J, Anderson K, Glavin RJ, MacIntyre D, Vernon D. Comparison of midazolam with propofol for sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70(4):419–422. doi: 10.1093/bja/70.4.419.
    1. Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E, Imperiale TF, Walker JA, Sandhu K, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(4):1229–1237. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.042.
    1. Bosslet GT, Devito ML, Lahm T, Sheski FD, Mathur PN. Nurse-administered propofol sedation: feasibility and safety in bronchoscopy. Respiration. 2010;79(4):315–321. doi: 10.1159/000271604.
    1. Facciolongo N, Piro R, Menzella F, Lusuardi M, Salio M, Agli LL, et al. Training and practice in bronchoscopy a national survey in Italy. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2013;79(3-4):128–133. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2013.5211.
    1. Ernst A, Wahidi MM, Read CA, Buckley JD, Addrizzo-Harris DJ, Shah PL, et al. Adult Bronchoscopy Training: Current State and Suggestions for the Future: CHEST Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2015;148(2):321–32. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0678.
    1. Bolliger CT, Mathur PN, Beamis JF, Becker HD, Cavaliere S, Colt H, et al. ERS/ATS statement on interventional pulmonology. European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(2):356–373. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00204602.
    1. Kennedy CC, Maldonado F, Cook DA. Simulation-based bronchoscopy training: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2013;144(1):183–192. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1786.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner