Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants

Cathrina H Edwards, Myriam Ml Grundy, Terri Grassby, Dafni Vasilopoulou, Gary S Frost, Peter J Butterworth, Sarah Ee Berry, Jeremy Sanderson, Peter R Ellis, Cathrina H Edwards, Myriam Ml Grundy, Terri Grassby, Dafni Vasilopoulou, Gary S Frost, Peter J Butterworth, Sarah Ee Berry, Jeremy Sanderson, Peter R Ellis

Abstract

Background: Cereal crops, particularly wheat, are a major dietary source of starch, and the bioaccessibility of starch has implications for postprandial glycemia. The structure and properties of plant foods have been identified as critical factors in influencing nutrient bioaccessibility; however, the physical and biochemical disassembly of cereal food during digestion has not been widely studied.

Objectives: The aims of this study were to compare the effects of 2 porridge meals prepared from wheat endosperm with different degrees of starch bioaccessibility on postprandial metabolism (e.g., glycemia) and to gain insight into the structural and biochemical breakdown of the test meals during gastroileal transit.

Design: A randomized crossover trial in 9 healthy ileostomy participants was designed to compare the effects of 55 g starch, provided as coarse (2-mm particles) or smooth (<0.2-mm particles) wheat porridge, on postprandial changes in blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, lipids, and gut hormones and on the resistant starch (RS) content of ileal effluent. Undigested food in the ileal output was examined microscopically to identify cell walls and encapsulated starch.

Results: Blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were significantly lower (i.e., 33%, 43%, 40%, and 50% lower 120-min incremental AUC, respectively) after consumption of the coarse porridge than after the smooth porridge (P < 0.01). In vitro, starch digestion was slower in the coarse porridge than in the smooth porridge (33% less starch digested at 90 min, P < 0.05, paired t test). In vivo, the structural integrity of coarse particles (∼2 mm) of wheat endosperm was retained during gastroileal transit. Microscopic examination revealed a progressive loss of starch from the periphery toward the particle core. The structure of the test meal had no effect on the amount or pattern of RS output.

Conclusion: The structural integrity of wheat endosperm is largely retained during gastroileal digestion and has a primary role in influencing the rate of starch amylolysis and, consequently, postprandial metabolism. This trial was registered at isrctn.org as ISRCTN40517475.

Keywords: bioaccessibility; digestion; glycemia; ileostomy; postprandial; starch; structure.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Blood and effluent collection time points and meal times. Fasting blood samples for baseline measurements were collected at −15 min (glucose only) and, for all analytes, immediately before the test meal (0 min). Blood samples thereafter were collected at regular intervals up to 4 h, and ileal effluent was collected every 2 h up to 10 h. Overnight effluent samples (between 2200 and 1100 the next day) were collected at variable time points, at the participants’ convenience. Effluent samples were preserved in ethanol or by freezing at the time of collection to inhibit enzymatic and chemical deterioration of carbohydrates (e.g., starch).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Starch digestibility (A) and HI (B) of smooth and coarse porridge endosperm relative to pure starch assessed in vitro. Digestibility curves show percentage of hydrolyzable starch digested for smooth and coarse endosperm and a highly digestible reference (i.e., pure, gelatinized durum wheat starch). In these curves, each experimental point represents the mean value from analysis performed in triplicate with vertical error bars showing SEMs. Digestibility curves of smooth and coarse porridge were significantly different (paired t test for incremental AUC at 60 min, P < 0.001). HI is the percentage of hydrolyzable starch digested at 90 min, and was calculated with the use of the previously described logarithm of slope model (18). HI values were significantly different between smooth and coarse porridge (paired t test, P = 0.03). HI, hydrolysis index; REF, reference.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Postprandial changes in blood glucose (A), insulin (B), C-peptide (C), and GIP (D) concentrations after smooth and coarse porridge meals. Each meal provided 55.4 g of starch. Values are mean deviations from baseline ± SEMs (n = 9 for glucose, insulin, and C-peptide and n = 8 for GIP) and were analyzed by ANOVA with meal and time as factors. Meal, time, and meal × time were significant for glucose (P = 0.038, <0.001, and <0.001), insulin (P = 0.046, <0.001, and 0.035), C-peptide (P = 0.018, <0.001, and <0.001), and GIP (P = 0.024, <0.001, and <0.001) responses, respectively. Time points at which values differed significantly, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 (paired t test with Bonferroni corrections). Insets show the iAUC between 0 and 120 min. GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; iAUC, incremental AUC.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Postprandial changes in serum TAG (A) and NEFA (B) concentrations after smooth and coarse porridge meals. Each meal provided 1.56 g fat. Values are mean deviations from baseline ± SEMs (n = 9) and were analyzed by ANOVA with meal and time as factors. Time effects were highly significant for both TAGs (P = 0.004) and NEFAs (P < 0.001), but meal and meal × time were not significant (P = 0.074 and 0.100 for TAGs and P = 0.969 and 0.249 for NEFAs). NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; TAG, triacylglycerol.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Sections of wheat endosperm particles from coarse porridge at various stages of digestion. All panels are light microscopic micrographs in which the starch was stained with 2.5% (wt:vol) Lugol’s iodine. Starch-filled wheat endosperm tissue from the cooked coarse porridge before digestion (A). Low-magnification view of a typical 2-mm wheat particle recovered in ileal effluent after 4 h (B). The staining pattern suggests a progressive digestion of starch from the particle periphery toward the core. A higher-magnification view than in panel B shows the digested edge of a particle collected from effluent after 4 h (C). Starch in the outermost cell layers (toward the right) has been digested, leaving empty cells. Typical particle remnant recovered in ileal effluent during the night (22-h gut residence time) (D). In the overnight samples, remnants of endosperm tissue were observed only when attached to adjacent outer tissue layers (aleurone, pericarp, and testa), and most of the starch had been digested.

References

    1. Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Augustin LSA, Franceschi S, Hamidi M, Marchie A, Jenkins AL, Axelsen M. Glycemic index: Overview of implications in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:266S–73S.
    1. Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Vuksan V, Jenkins AL, Buckley GC, Wong GS, Josse RG. Beneficial effect of a low glycaemic index diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1992;9:451–8.
    1. Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:281S–5S.
    1. Lafiandra D, Riccardi G, Shewry PR. Improving cereal grain carbohydrates for diet and health. J Cereal Sci 2014;59:312–26.
    1. Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:5–56.
    1. Jenkins DJA, Ghafari H, Wolever TMS, Taylor RH, Jenkins AL, Barker HM, Fielden H, Bowling AC. Relationship between rate of digestion of foods and post-prandial glycaemia. Diabetologia 1982;22:450–5.
    1. O’Dea K, Snow P, Nestel P. Rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro as a predictor of metabolic responses to complex carbohydrate in vivo. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1991–3.
    1. Holm J, Björck I. Bioavailability of starch in various wheat-based bread products: Evaluation of metabolic responses in healthy subjects and rate and extent of in vitro starch digestion. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:420–9.
    1. Berry SE, Tydeman EA, Lewis HB, Phalora R, Rosborough J, Picout DR, Ellis PR. Manipulation of lipid bioaccessibility of almond seeds influences postprandial lipemia in healthy human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:922–9.
    1. Tydeman EA, Parker ML, Faulks RM, Cross KL, Fillery-Travis A, Gidley MJ, Rich GT, Waldron KW. Effect of carrot (Daucus carota) microstructure on carotene bioaccessibility in the upper gastrointestinal tract. 2. In vivo digestions. J Agric Food Chem 2010;58:9855–60.
    1. Parada J, Aguilera JM. Food microstructure affects the bioavailability of several nutrients. J Food Sci 2007;72:R21–32.
    1. Ellis PR, Kendall CWC, Ren Y, Parker C, Pacy JF, Waldron KW, Jenkins DJA. Role of cell walls in bioaccessibility of lipids in almond seeds. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:604–13.
    1. McDougall GJ, Morrison IM, Stewart D, Hillman JR. Plant cell walls as dietary fibre: range, structure, processing and function. J Sci Food Agric 1996;70:133–50.
    1. Noah L, Guillon F, Bouchet B, Buleon A, Molis C, Gratas M, Champ M. Digestion of carbohydrate from white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in healthy humans. J Nutr 1998;128:977–85.
    1. Livesey G, Wilkinson JA, Roe M, Faulks R, Clark S, Brown JC, Kennedy H, Elia M. Influence of the physical form of barley grain on the digestion of its starch in the human small intestine and implications for health. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:75–81.
    1. Golay A, Coulston AM, Hollenbeck CB, Kaiser LL, Würsch P, Reaven GM. Comparison of metabolic effects of white beans processed into two different physical forms. Diabetes Care 1986;9:260–6.
    1. Järvi A, Karlstrom B, Granfeldt Y, Björck I, Vessby B, Asp N. The influence of food structure on postprandial metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;61:837–42.
    1. Edwards CH, Warren FJ, Milligan PJ, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. A novel method for classifying starch digestion by modelling the amylolysis of plant foods using first-order enzyme kinetic principles. Food Funct 2014;5:2751–8.
    1. Jenkins DJA, Wesson V, Wolever TMS, Jenkins AL, Kalmusky J, Guidici S, Csima A, Josse RG, Wong GS. Wholemeal versus wholegrain breads: proportion of whole or cracked grain and the glycaemic response. BMJ 1988;297:958–60.
    1. Englyst HN, Cummings JH. Digestion of polysaccharides of potato in the small intestine of man. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:423–31.
    1. Patel H, Day R, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. A mechanistic approach to studies of the possible digestion of retrograded starch by alpha-amylase revealed using a log of slope (LOS) plot. Carbohydr Polym 2014;113:182–8.
    1. Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Collier GR, Lee R, Wong GS, Josse RG. Metabolic response to test meals containing different carbohydrate foods: 1. Relationship between rate of digestion and plasma insulin response. Nutr Res 1988;8:573–81.
    1. Monro JA, Mishra S. Glycaemic index as a property of foods is accurately measured by an available carbohydrate method that mimics the glycaemic response. J Nutr 2010;140:1328.
    1. Goñi I, Garcia-Alonso A, Saura-Calixto F. A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index. Nutr Res 1997;17:427–37.
    1. Slaughter SL, Ellis PR, Butterworth PJ. An investigation of the action of porcine pancreatic [alpha]-amylase on native and gelatinised starches. BBA- Gen Subjects 2001;1525(1-2):29–36.
    1. Butterworth PJ, Warren FJ, Grassby T, Patel H, Ellis PR. Analysis of starch amylolysis using plots for first-order kinetics. Carbohydr Polym 2012;87:2189–97.
    1. Filippou A, Berry SEE, Baumgartner S, Mensink RP, Sanders TAB. Palmitic acid in the sn-2 position decreases glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in healthy adult. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:549–54.
    1. Englyst HN, Cummings JH. Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am J Clin Nutr 1985;42:778–87.
    1. Silvester KR, Englyst HN, Cummings JH. Ileal recovery of starch from whole diets containing resistant starch measured in vitro and fermentation of ileal effluent. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:403–11.
    1. McCleary BV, Solah V, Gibson TS. Quantitative measurement of total starch in cereal flours and products. J Cereal Sci 1994;20:51–8.
    1. Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Wolever TMS, Josse RG, Wong GS. The glycaemic response to carbohydrate foods. Lancet 1984;2:388–91.
    1. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Dietary Reference Values (DRVs) for food energy and nutrients for the UK. London: The Stationary Office Ltd.; 2011.
    1. Shewry PR. Wheat. J Exp Bot 2009;60:1537–53.
    1. Kristensen M, Jensen MG, Riboldi G, Petronio M, Bügel S, Toubro S, Tetens I, Astrup A. Wholegrain vs. refined wheat bread and pasta. Effect on postprandial glycemia, appetite, and subsequent ad libitum energy intake in young healthy adults. Appetite 2010;54:163–9.
    1. Juntunen KS, Laaksonen DE, Autio K, Niskanen LK, Holst JJ, Savolainen KE, Liukkonen K-H, Poutanen KS, Mykkanen HM. Structural differences between rye and wheat breads but not total fiber content may explain the lower postprandial insulin response to rye bread. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:957–64.
    1. Grassby T, Edwards CH, Grundy M, Ellis PR. Functional components and mechanisms of action of 'dietary fibre’ in the upper gastrointestinal tract: implications for health. In: Harding SE, editor. Stability of complex carbohydrate structures: biofuels, foods, vaccines and shipwrecks. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013.
    1. Cassady BA, Hollis JH, Fulford AD, Considine RV, Mattes RD. Mastication of almonds: effects of lipid bioaccessibility, appetite, and hormone response. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:794–800.
    1. Frecka JM, Hollis JH, Mattes RD. Effects of appetite, BMI, food form and flavor on mastication: almonds as a test food. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:1231–8.
    1. Meier JJ, Nauck MA. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;18:587–606.
    1. Chaudhri O, Small C, Bloom S. Gastrointestinal hormones regulating appetite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006;361:1187–209.
    1. Wachters-Hagedoorn RE, Priebe MG, Heimweg JAJ, Heiner AM, Englyst KN, Holst JJ, Stellaard F, Vonk RJ. The rate of intestinal glucose absorption is correlated with plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations in healthy men. J Nutr 2006;136:1511–6.
    1. Robinson DS. Plasma triglyceride metabolism. J Clin Pathol 1973;s1-5(1):5–10.
    1. Ginsberg HN, Zhang Y-L, Hernandez-Ono A. Regulation of plasma triglycerides in insulin resistance and diabetes. Arch Med Res 2005;36:232–40.
    1. Frayn KN. Metabolic regulation: a human perspective, 3rd ed. Chichester (United Kingdom): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2010.
    1. Parks EJ. Effect of dietary carbohydrate on triglyceride metabolism in humans. J Nutr 2001;131:2772S–4S.
    1. McCarty MF. An elevation of triglycerides reflecting decreased triglyceride clearance may not be pathogenic – relevance to high-carbohydrate diets. Med Hypotheses 2004;63:1065–73.
    1. Hoebler C, Karinthi A, Devaux M-F, Guillon F, Gallant DJG, Bouchet B, Melegari C, Barry J-L. Physical and chemical transformations of cereal food during oral digestion in human subjects. Br J Nutr 1998;80:429–36.
    1. Novotny JA, Gebauer SK, Baer DJ. Discrepancy between the Atwater factor predicted and empirically measured energy values of almonds in human diets. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:296–301.
    1. Livesey G. Energy values of unavailable carbohydrate and diets: an inquiry and analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;51:617–37.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner