A multicentre, randomised intervention study of the Paediatric Early Warning Score: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Claus Sixtus Jensen, Hanne Aagaard, Hanne Vebert Olesen, Hans Kirkegaard, Claus Sixtus Jensen, Hanne Aagaard, Hanne Vebert Olesen, Hans Kirkegaard

Abstract

Background: Patients' evolving critical illness can be predicted and prevented. However, failure to identify the signs of critical illness and subsequent lack of appropriate action for patients developing acute and critical illness remain a problem. Challenges in assessing whether a child is critically ill may be due to children's often uncharacteristic symptoms of serious illness. Children may seem relatively unaffected until shortly before circulatory and respiratory failure and cardiac arrest. The Bedside Paediatric Early Warning Score has been validated in a large multinational study and is used in two regions in Denmark. However, healthcare professionals experience difficulties in relation to measuring blood pressure and to the lack of assessment of children's level of consciousness. In addition, is it noteworthy that in 23,288-hour studies, all seven items of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning Score were recorded in only 5.1% of patients. This trial aims to compare two Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) models to identify the better model for identifying acutely and critically ill children. The hypothesis is that the Central Denmark Region PEWS model is superior to the Bedside PEWS in terms of reducing unplanned transfers to intensive care or transfers from regional hospitals to the university hospital among already hospitalised children.

Methods/design: This is a multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial where children are allocated to one of two different PEWS models. The study involves all paediatric departments and one emergency department in the Central Denmark Region. The primary outcome is unplanned transfer to the paediatric intensive care unit or transfer from regional hospitals to the university hospital. Based on preliminary data, 14,000 children should be included to gain a power of 80% (with a 5% significance level) and to detect a clinically significant difference of 30% of unplanned transfers to intensive care or from regional hospitals to the paediatric department at the university department. A safety interim analysis will be performed after inclusion of 7000 patients.

Discussion: This is the first randomised trial to investigate two different PEWS models. This study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of a new PEWS model and contributes to knowledge of hospitalised children's clinical deterioration.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02433327 . Registered on 27 April 2015.

Keywords: Intensive care unit; Paediatric Early Warning Score; Paediatrics; Randomised controlled trial.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion rate
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SPIRIT study schedule

References

    1. McCabe A, Duncan H, Heward Y. Paediatric early warning systems: where do we go from here? Paediatr Nurs. 2004;21(1):14–7. doi: 10.7748/paed.21.1.14.s20.
    1. McGaughey J, Aldernice F, Fowler R, Kapila A, Mayhew A, Moutray M. Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:1.
    1. Duncan H. The paediatric early warning score. British J Intensive Care. 2007;17:133–9.
    1. Nygaard U, Schmiegelow K. Pædiatri - En illustreret lærebog [Paediatrics - an illustrated textbook] 1. Copenhagen: Fadl’s Forlag; 2010. Akut pædiatri [Emergency paediatrics] pp. 121–36.
    1. Lundstrøm K. Det akut syge barn [The critically ill child] In: Antonsen K, Callesen T, editors. Den akutte patient [The critically ill patient] Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 2010. pp. 353–76.
    1. Nowak EJ, Brilli JR. Pediatric rapid response teams: is it time? JAMA. 2007;298(19):2311–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2311.
    1. Robson JM, Cooper LC, Medicus AL, Quinyero JM, Zuniga AS. Comparison of three acute care pediatric early warning scoring tools. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(6):e33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.12.002.
    1. Pearson GA, editor. Why children die: a pilot study 2006; England (South West, North East and West Midlands), Wales and Northern Ireland. London: CEMACH; 2008.
    1. Duncan H, et al. The pediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to predict urgent medical need in hospitalized children. J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.007.
    1. Parshuram C, et al. Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc7998.
    1. Parshuram C, et al. Multicentre validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):R184. doi: 10.1186/cc10337.
    1. Chan A, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 2013;346(jan08 15):e7586.
    1. Straney L, et al. Paediatric Index of Mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(7):673–81. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829760cf.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325(7365):652–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses. Lancet. 2005;365(9471):1657–61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66516-6.
    1. Chaiyakulsil C, Pandee U. Validation of pediatric early warning score in pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(4):694–8. doi: 10.1111/ped.12595.
    1. Bell D, et al. The Texas Children’s Hospital Pediatric Advanced Warning Score as a predictor of clinical deterioration in hospitalized infants and children: a modification of the PEWS tool. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(6):e2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2013.04.005.
    1. National guideline for Early Warning Score on adult hospitalised patients. . Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Acutely ill patients in hospital: Recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.
    1. National Patient Safety Agency . Review of patient safety for children and young people. 2009, 0886. London: National Patient Safety Agency; 2009.
    1. Chapman S, et al. Systematic review of paediatric alert criteria for identifying hospitalised children at risk of critical deterioration. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(4):600–11. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1715-x.
    1. Roland D, et al. Use of paediatric early warning systems in Great Britain: has there been a change of practice in the last 7 years? Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(1):26–9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302783.
    1. Edwards ED, et al. Prospective cohort study to test the predictability of the Cardiff and Vale paediatric early warning system. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(8):602–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.142026.
    1. Tibballs J, et al. Reduction of paediatric in-patient cardiac arrest and death with a medical emergency team: preliminary results. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(11):1148–52. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.069401.
    1. Tucker K, et al. Prospective evaluation of a pediatric inpatient early warning scoring system. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2009;14(2):79–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00178.x.
    1. Zhai H, et al. Developing and evaluating a machine learning based algorithm to predict the need of pediatric intensive care unit transfer for newly hospitalized children. Resuscitation. 2014;85(8):1065–71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.009.
    1. Ministry of Health and Prevention. Lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter [Resolution on research ethics of health science research projects]. 2011. . Accessed 15 Jan 2017.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner