Cessation of smoking trial in the emergency department (CoSTED): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Caitlin Notley, Lucy Clark, Pippa Belderson, Emma Ward, Allan B Clark, Steve Parrott, Sanjay Agrawal, Ben M Bloom, Adrian A Boyle, Geraint Morris, Alasdair Gray, Tim Coats, Mei-See Man, Linda Bauld, Richard Holland, Ian Pope, Caitlin Notley, Lucy Clark, Pippa Belderson, Emma Ward, Allan B Clark, Steve Parrott, Sanjay Agrawal, Ben M Bloom, Adrian A Boyle, Geraint Morris, Alasdair Gray, Tim Coats, Mei-See Man, Linda Bauld, Richard Holland, Ian Pope

Abstract

Introduction: Attendees of emergency departments (EDs) have a higher than expected prevalence of smoking. ED attendance may be a good opportunity to prompt positive behaviour change, even for smokers not currently motivated to quit. This study aims to determine whether an opportunist smoking cessation intervention delivered in the ED can help daily smokers attending the ED quit smoking and is cost-effective.

Methods and analysis: A two-arm pragmatic, multicentred, parallel-group, individually randomised, controlled superiority trial with an internal pilot, economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation. The trial will compare ED-based brief smoking cessation advice, including provision of an e-cigarette and referral to local stop smoking services (intervention) with the provision of contact details for local stop smoking services (control). Target sample size is 972, recruiting across 6 National Health Service EDs in England and Scotland. Outcomes will be collected at 1, 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome at 6 months is carbon monoxide verified continuous smoking abstinence.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial was approved by the South Central-Oxford B Research Committee (21/SC/0288). Dissemination will include the publication of outcomes, and the process and economic evaluations in peer-reviewed journals. The findings will also be appropriately disseminated to relevant practice, policy and patient representative groups.

Trial registration number: NCT04854616; protocol V.4.2.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; preventive medicine; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram. CO, carbon monoxide; NHS, National Health Service; NRT, Nicotine replacement therapy; EQ-5D-5L, quality of life validated measure

References

    1. Chan SSC, Leung DYP, Abdullah ASM, et al. . A randomized controlled trial of a smoking reduction plus nicotine replacement therapy intervention for smokers not willing to quit smoking. Addiction 2011;106:1155–63. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03363.x.
    1. Office for national statistics . Adult smoking habits in the UK. 2019. Available:
    1. Royal College of Physicians . Hiding in plain sight. treating tobacco dependency in the NHS. A report by the tobacco advisory group of the royal college of physicians; 2018.
    1. RCP London . Nicotine without smoke: tobacco harm reduction. 2016. Available:
    1. Keene J, Rodriguez J. Are mental health problems associated with use of accident and emergency and health-related harm? Eur J Public Health 2007;17:387–93. 10.1093/eurpub/ckl248.
    1. Smoking In England . Latest statistics. 2020. Available:
    1. Boudreaux ED, Baumann BM, Friedman K, et al. . Smoking stage of change and interest in an emergency department-based intervention. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:211–8. 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.022.
    1. Drummond C, Deluca P, Coulton S, et al. . The effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief intervention in emergency departments: a multicentre pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2014;9:e99463. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099463.
    1. Lemhoefer C, Rabe GL, Wellmann J, et al. . Emergency department-initiated tobacco control: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prev Chronic Dis 2017;14:E89. 10.5888/pcd14.160434.
    1. Hajek P, Phillips-Waller A, Przulj D, et al. . A randomized trial of E-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med 2019;380:629–37. 10.1056/NEJMoa1808779.
    1. Hartmann-Boyce J, McRobbie H, Lindson N, et al. . Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;4:CD010216. 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub5.
    1. English TM, Smith TB, Song X, et al. . Barriers to electronic cigarette use. Public Health Nurs 2018;35:363–8. 10.1111/phn.12406.
    1. Department of Health and Social Care . Prevention is better than cure. n.d. Available:
    1. Action on Smoking and Health . Smoking still kills: protecting children, reducing inequalities. London: ASH; 2015.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (tidier) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:bmj.g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. . The fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerström tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119–27. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.
    1. Crittenden KS, Manfredi C, Lacey L, et al. . Measuring readiness and motivation to quit smoking among women in public health clinics. Addict Behav 1994;19:497–507. 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90005-1.
    1. EQ-5D-5L – EQ-5D. 2020. Available:
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6:42. 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 2011;71:S52–63. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.
    1. Bernstein SL, D’Onofrio G, Rosner J, et al. . Successful tobacco dependence treatment in low-income emergency department patients: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2015;66:140–7:S0196-0644(15)00284-X. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.030.
    1. Hennrikus D, Joseph AM, Lando HA. Effectiveness of a smoking cessation program for peripheral artery disease patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2011;53:1752. 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.016.
    1. McFall M, Saxon AJ, Malte CA, et al. . Integrating tobacco cessation into mental health care for posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:2485–93. 10.1001/jama.2010.1769.
    1. Pieterse ME, Seydel ER, DeVries H, et al. . Effectiveness of a minimal contact smoking cessation program for Dutch general practitioners: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2001;32:182–90. 10.1006/pmed.2000.0791.
    1. Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone-Banks J, et al. . Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;7:CD004307 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6
    1. West R. Assessing smoking cessation performance in NHS stop smoking services: the russell standard (clinical). 2005;
    1. NICE . Introduction: Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. 2022. Available:
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. . Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258. 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Kotz D, Brown J, West R. Predictive validity of the motivation to stop scale (MTSS): a single-item measure of motivation to stop smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;15–9. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.012

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner