Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: Philly Food Bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011

Candace R Young, Jennifer L Aquilante, Sara Solomon, Lisa Colby, Mukethe A Kawinzi, Nicky Uy, Giridhar Mallya, Candace R Young, Jennifer L Aquilante, Sara Solomon, Lisa Colby, Mukethe A Kawinzi, Nicky Uy, Giridhar Mallya

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated whether Philly Food Bucks, a bonus incentive program at farmers markets, is associated with increased fruit and vegetable consumption and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) sales at farmers markets in low-income areas.

Methods: A convenience sample of 662 customers at 22 farmers markets in low-income neighborhoods in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was surveyed via face-to-face interviews. Questions addressed shopping characteristics, self-reported change in fruit and vegetable consumption, whether customers tried new fruits or vegetables, use of Philly Food Bucks, and demographic information. Market-level SNAP sales and Philly Food Bucks redemption data were also collected to monitor sales patterns.

Results: Philly Food Bucks users were significantly more likely than nonusers to report increasing fruit and vegetable consumption (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.7; P < .001) and to report trying new fruits or vegetables (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; P = .006). At the market level, average SNAP sales more than doubled at farmers markets in low-income areas in the first 2 years of the Philly Food Bucks program. At the city's largest farmers market in a low-income area, the program was associated with an almost 5-fold higher increase in annual SNAP sales compared with baseline.

Conclusion: Results from this study demonstrate that a bonus incentive program tied to SNAP was associated with self-reported increases in fruit and vegetable consumption and increased SNAP sales at participating farmers markets in low-income communities. More research is warranted to evaluate the long-term impact of bonus incentives on farmers market use, dietary behaviors, and health outcomes.

References

    1. Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs DR Jr. Associations of the local food environment with diet quality — a comparison of assessments based on surveys and geographic information systems: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167(8):917–24. 10.1093/aje/kwm394
    1. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments — disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(1):74–81. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.025
    1. Leone AF, Rigby S, Betterley C, Park S, Kurtz H, Johnson MA, et al. Store type and demographic influence on the availability and price of healthful foods, Leon County, Florida, 2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(6):A140. . Accessed May 1, 2012.
    1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Household Health Survey. Philadelphia (PA): Public Health Management Corporation, Community Health Database; 2010. . Accessed August 23, 2013.
    1. Giang T, Karpyn A, Laurison HB, Hillier A, Perry RD. Closing the grocery gap in underserved communities: the creation of the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(3):272–9.
    1. Gittelsohn J, Suratkar S, Song HJ, Sacher S, Rajan R, Rasooly IR, et al. Process evaluation of Baltimore Healthy Stores: a pilot health intervention program with supermarkets and corner stores in Baltimore City. Health Promot Pract 2010;11(5):723–32. 10.1177/1524839908329118
    1. New York City Healthy Bodegas Initiative. New York (NY): New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2010. . Accessed April 23, 2012.
    1. Healthy corner stores. Philadelphia (PA): Philadelphia Department of Public Health. . Accessed April 23, 2012.
    1. Freedman DA, Bell BA, Collins LV. The Veggie Project: a case study of a multi-component farmers’ market intervention. J Prim Prev 2011;32(3-4):213–24. 10.1007/s10935-011-0245-9
    1. Suarez-Balcazar Y, Martinez LI, Cox G, Jayraj A. African Americans’ views on access to healthy foods: what a farmers’ market provides. Journal of Extension 2006;44(2). .
    1. Drewnowski A. Obesity and the food environment — dietary energy density and diet costs. Am J Prev Med 2004;27(3 Suppl):154–62. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.011
    1. Anderson JV, Bybee DI, Brown RM, McLean DF, Garcia EM, Breer ML, et al. 5 A Day fruit and vegetable intervention improves consumption in a low income population. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101(2):195–202. 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00052-9
    1. Herman DR, Harrison GG, Jenks E. Choices made by low-income women provided with an economic supplement for fresh fruit and vegetable purchase. J Am Diet Assoc 2006;106(5):740–4. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.004
    1. Farmers market services. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. . Updated February 2012. Accessed May 1, 2012.
    1. Public markets and community-based food systems — making them work in lower-income neighborhoods. New York (NY): Project for Public Spaces, Inc; 2003. . Accessed May 1, 2012.
    1. Young C, Karpyn A, Uy N, Wich K, Glyn J. Farmers’ markets in low income communities: impact of community environment, food programs and public policy. Community Development 2011;42(2):208–20. 10.1080/15575330.2010.551663
    1. Buttenheim AM, Havassy J, Fang M, Glyn J, Karpyn AE. Increasing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program/Electronic Benefits Transfer sales at farmers’ markets with vendor-operated wireless point-of-sale terminals. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112(5):636–41. 10.1016/j.jand.2011.12.021
    1. Bunnell R, O’Neil D, Soler R, Payne R, Giles WH, Collins J, et al. Fifty communities putting prevention to work: accelerating chronic disease prevention through policy, systems and environmental change. J Community Health 2012;37(5):1081–90. 10.1007/s10900-012-9542-3
    1. School lunch program. Alexandria (VA): US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. . Updated October 2011. Accessed April 17, 2012.
    1. Building data report for October 2010 children eligible. Harrisburg (PA): Pennsylvania Department of Education, Division of Food and Nutrition; 2010. . Accessed April 17, 2012.
    1. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. Medical assistance, food stamps and cash assistance statistics reports, 2011. . Accessed April 26, 2012.
    1. How to interpret odds ratios in logistic regression. Los Angeles (CA): University of California, Los Angeles, Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. . Accessed April 27, 2012.
    1. Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP). Alexandria (VA): US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. . Updated February 16, 2012. Accessed May 17, 2012.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner