Relative validity of an FFQ to estimate daily food and nutrient intakes for Chilean adults

Mahshid Dehghan, Solange Martinez, Xiaohe Zhang, Pamela Seron, Fernando Lanas, Shofiqul Islam, Anwar T Merchant, Mahshid Dehghan, Solange Martinez, Xiaohe Zhang, Pamela Seron, Fernando Lanas, Shofiqul Islam, Anwar T Merchant

Abstract

Objective: FFQ are commonly used to rank individuals by their food and nutrient intakes in large epidemiological studies. The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate an FFQ to rank individuals participating in an ongoing Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study in Chile.

Design: An FFQ and four 24 h dietary recalls were completed over 1 year. Pearson correlation coefficients, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated correlations and weighted kappa were computed between the dietary recalls and the FFQ. The level of agreement between the two dietary assessment methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.

Setting: Temuco, Chile.

Subjects: Overall, 166 women and men enrolled in the present study. One hundred men and women participated in FFQ development and sixty-six individuals participated in FFQ validation.

Results: The FFQ consisted of 109 food items. For nutrients, the crude correlation coefficients between the dietary recalls and FFQ varied from 0.14 (protein) to 0.44 (fat). Energy adjustment and de-attenuation improved correlation coefficients and almost all correlation coefficients exceeded 0.40. Similar correlation coefficients were observed for food groups; the highest de-attenuated energy adjusted correlation coefficient was found for margarine and butter (0.75) and the lowest for potatoes (0.12).

Conclusions: The FFQ showed moderate to high agreement for most nutrients and food groups, and can be used to rank individuals based on energy, nutrient and food intakes. The validation study was conducted in a unique setting and indicated that the tool is valid for use by adults in Chile.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland–Altman plots assessing the level of agreement between the FFQ and four 24 h dietary recalls among men and women (n 66) participating in the FFQ validation study. The difference between mean intakes estimated by the FFQ and dietary recalls (DR) was plotted against the average of mean intakes by the two methods for each participant and for: (a) energy; (b) protein; (c) carbohydrate; (d) total fat; (e) SFA; (f) PUFA; (g) fibre; (h) folate; (i) vitamin C; (j) sodium; (k) potassium; (l) calcium. ———, Mean difference; – – – –, 95 % limits of agreements

References

    1. Hong S, Song Y, Lee KH et al. (2012) A fruit and dairy dietary pattern is associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome. Metabolism 61, 883–890.
    1. Villani AM, Clifton PM & Keogh JB (2012) Sodium intake and excretion in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional analysis of overweight and obese males and females in Australia. J Hum Nutr Diet 25, 129–139.
    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK et al. (2012) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307, 491–497.
    1. Maillot M & Drewnowski A (2012) A conflict between nutritionally adequate diets and meeting the 2010 dietary guidelines for sodium. Am J Prev Med 42, 174–179.
    1. Mekary RA, Rimm EB, Giovannucci E et al. (2011) Joint association of glycemic load and alcohol intake with type 2 diabetes incidence in women. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 1525–1532.
    1. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V et al. (2002) Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review. Public Health Nutr 5, 567–587.
    1. Teo K, Chow CK, Vaz M et al. (2009) The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Am Heart J 158, 1–7.
    1. Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK et al. (2011) Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet 378, 1231–1243.
    1. Nelson M, Atkinson M & Meyer J (1997) A Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
    1. Merchant AT & Dehghan M (2006) Food composition database development for between country comparisons. Nutr J 5, 2.
    1. Willett WC & Lenart E (1998) Reproducibility and validity of food frequency questionnaire. In Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed., pp. 101–147 [WC Willett, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. McKeown NM, Day NE, Welch AA et al. (2001) Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 188–196.
    1. Huybrechts I, De Backer G, De Bacquer D et al. (2009) Relative validity and reproducibility of a food-frequency questionnaire for estimating food intakes among Flemish preschoolers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6, 382–399.
    1. Bland JM & Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307–310.
    1. Pakseresht M & Sharma S (2010) Validation of a culturally appropriate quantitative food frequency questionnaire for Inuvialuit population in the Northwest Territories, Canada. J Hum Nutr Diet 23, Suppl. 1, 75–82.
    1. Willett WC (1998) Nutrition Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Bohlscheid-Thomas S, Hoting I, Boeing H et al. (1997) Reproducibility and relative validity of energy and macronutrient intake of a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S71–S81.
    1. Deschamps V, de Lauzon-Guillain B, Lafay L et al. (2009) Reproducibility and relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire among French adults and adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 282–291.
    1. Paalanen L, Mannisto S, Virtanen MJ et al. (2006) Validity of a food frequency questionnaire varied by age and body mass index. J Clin Epidemiol 59, 994–1001.
    1. Xia W, Sun C, Zhang L et al. (2011) Reproducibility and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire developed for female adolescents in Suihua, North China. PLoS One 6, e19656.
    1. Jackson M, Walker S, Cade J et al. (2001) Reproducibility and validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among Jamaicans of African origin. Public Health Nutr 4, 971–980.
    1. Jackson MD, Walker SP, Younger NM et al. (2011) Use of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Jamaican adults: validation and correlation with biomarkers. Nutr J 10, 28.
    1. Loy SL, Marhazlina M, Nor AY et al. (2011) Development, validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire in pregnancy for the Universiti Sains Malaysia birth cohort study. Malays J Nutr 17, 1–18.
    1. Hong S, Choi Y, Lee HJ et al. (2010) Development and validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Korean type 2 diabetic patients. Korean Diabetes J 34, 32–39.
    1. Hu FB, Rimm E, Smith-Warner SA et al. (1999) Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 243–249.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner