Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation-based titration reduces propofol consumption and incidence of hypotension during general anesthesia induction: A randomized controlled trial

Lihong Chen, Kun Lu, Tongfeng Luo, Huiming Liang, Yuqin Gui, Sanqing Jin, Lihong Chen, Kun Lu, Tongfeng Luo, Huiming Liang, Yuqin Gui, Sanqing Jin

Abstract

Administration of a single propofol bolus dose for anesthesia induction causes hypotension. We included 160 patients (74 males and 86 females; mean age, 42.4 ± 10.7 [range: 18-60] years) with the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Using simple randomization, the patients were divided into a conventional group (n = 80; received 2 mg/kg propofol at a rate of 250 mg/min) and titrated group (n = 80; received propofol at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min until the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale score reached 1 point). Fentanyl (4 µg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) were administered, as appropriate. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at different time points. Propofol consumption, hypotension, and other adverse events were recorded. All the patients were intubated without awareness. Compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed more stable blood pressure (p < 0.05), as well as a lower decrease in systolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure at 1 and 3 min, and diastolic blood pressure at 1 min after propofol administration (p < 0.01). Moreover, compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed a lower post-intubation hypotension incidence (9 vs. 19 cases; p = 0.04), as well as lower total propofol dosage and propofol dose per kilogram of body weight (93.57 ± 14.40 mg vs. 116.80 ± 22.37 mg and 1.73 ± 0.27 mg/kg vs. 2.02 ± 0.08 mg/kg, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared with conventional propofol usage, titrated propofol administration can reduce the incidence of hypotension and propofol consumption during anesthesia induction.

Keywords: Propofol; administration and dosage; general anesthesia; hypotension; individuation; rapid sequence induction and intubation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram of the study. Group C: conventional group, propofol was conventionally administered as a single bolus dose calculated based on the body weight. Group T: titrated group, propofol was administered at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min until the OAA/S score reached 1 point. OAA/S: Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changing trend of SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR before and after intubation. (a) Changing trend of SBP before intubation. (b) Changing trend of DBP before intubation. (c) Changing trend of MAP before intubation. (d) Changing trend of HR before intubation. (e) Changing trend of SBP after endotracheal intubation. (f) Changing trend of DBP after endotracheal intubation. (g) Changing trend of MAP after endotracheal intubation. (h) Changing trend of HR after endotracheal intubation. Group T and Group C: as shown in Figure 1. T0: baseline before propofol administration; T1, T2, and T3: 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min, respectively, after propofol administration; T4: immediately after endotracheal intubation; T5, T6, and T7: 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min, respectively, after endotracheal intubation. ANOVA for repeated measures. #p < 0.05 between two groups, *p < 0.01 is compared with the conventional group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Propofol consumption during induction before intubation and when intubation completed. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Group T and Group C: as shown in Figure 1. (a) Total propofol consumption before intubation. (b) Propofol consumption per kilogram of body weight before intubation. (c) Total propofol consumption at the completion of intubation. (d) Propofol consumption per kilogram of body weight at the completion of intubation. Student's t-test, *p < 0.01 is compared with the titrated group.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Scattered profile of propofol consumption per kilogram of body weight before tracheal intubation in the titrated group. (a) Scattered plot of the frequency distribution of propofol dosage per kilogram of body weight. (b) Case distribution at different dose ranges per kilogram of body weight.

References

    1. Chan VW, Chung FF. Propofol infusion for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in elderly patients: recovery and hemodynamic profiles. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8: 317–323.
    1. de Wit F, van Vliet AL, de Wilde RB, et al.. The effect of propofol on haemodynamics: cardiac output, venous return, mean systemic filling pressure, and vascular resistances. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 784–789.
    1. Shah NK, Harris M, Govindugari K, et al.. Effect of propofol titration v/s bolus during induction of anesthesia on hemodynamics and bispectral index. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2011; 21: 275–281.
    1. Reich DL, Hossain S, Krol M, et al.. Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 622–628.
    1. Dundee JW, Robinson FP, McCollum JS, et al.. Sensitivity to propofol in the elderly. Anaesthesia 1986; 41: 482–485.
    1. Kanonidou Z, Karystianou G. Anesthesia for the elderly. Hippokratia 2007; 11: 175–177.
    1. Duke T. A new intravenous anesthetic agent: propofol. Can Vet J 1995; 36: 181–183.
    1. Tsuchiya M, Yamada T, Asada A. Pleth variability index predicts hypotension during anesthesia induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 596–602.
    1. Liu Q, Kong AL, Chen R, et al.. Propofol and arrhythmias: two sides of the coin. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2011; 32: 817–823.
    1. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Kelley SD, et al.. Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a “triple low” of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1195–1203.
    1. Green RS, Butler MB. Postintubation hypotension in general anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. J Intensive Care Med 2016; 31: 667–675.
    1. Kirkbride DA, Parker JL, Williams GD, et al.. Induction of anesthesia in the elderly ambulatory patient: a double-blinded comparison of propofol and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1185–1187.
    1. Blum J, Kochs E, Forster N, et al.. The influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: a randomized trial. PLoS Clin Trials 2006; 1: e17.
    1. Zahoor A, Ahmed N. The effects of duration of propofol injection on hemodynamics. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2010; 20: 845–850.
    1. U.S national library of medicine label : Propofol injection, emulsion . Accessed 20 August 2021.
    1. McKinstry-Wu AR, Wasilczuk AZ, Harrison BA, et al.. Analysis of stochastic fluctuations in responsiveness is a critical step toward personalized anesthesia. eLife 2019; 8:e50143.
    1. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, et al.. Relation between initial blood distribution volume and propofol induction dose requirement. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 205–210.
    1. van Kralingen S, Diepstraten J, van de Garde EMW, et al.. Comparative evaluation of propofol 350 and 200 mg for induction of anaesthesia in morbidly obese patients: a randomized double-blind pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 572–574.
    1. Goodchild CS, Serrao JM. Propofol-induced cardiovascular depression: science and art. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 641–642.
    1. Dussaussoy C, Peres M, Jaoul V, et al.. Automated titration of propofol and remifentanil decreases the anesthesiologist's Workload during vascular or thoracic surgery: a randomized prospective study. J Clin Monit Comput 2014; 28: 35–40.
    1. Liu Y, Li M, Yang D, et al.. Closed-loop control better than open-loop control of profofol tci guided by bis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the concert-cl closed-loop system. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0123862.
    1. Orliaguet GA, Benabbes Lambert F, Chazot T, et al.. Feasibility of closed-loop titration of propofol and remifentanil guided by the bispectral monitor in pediatric and adolescent patients. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 759–767.
    1. Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA, et al.. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1097–1108.
    1. Ferreira AL, Mendes JG, Nunes CS, et al.. Evaluation of bispectral index time delay in response to anesthesia induction: an observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol 2019; 69: 377–382.
    1. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al.. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10: 244–251.
    1. Kasuya Y, Govinda R, Rauch S, et al.. The correlation between bispectral index and observational sedation scale in volunteers sedated with dexmedetomidine and propofol. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1811–1815.
    1. Lim TW, Choi YH, Kim JY, et al.. Efficacy of the bispectral index and observer's Assessment of alertness/sedation scale in monitoring sedation during spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Int Med Res 2020; 48: 030006051989316.
    1. Mu J, Jiang T, Xu XB, et al.. Comparison of target-controlled infusion and manual infusion for propofol anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 1049–1055.
    1. Chen G, Buell O, Gruenewald M, et al.. A comparison between target-controlled and manually controlled propofol infusions in patients undergoing routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 928–935.
    1. Kasaba T, Yamaga M, Iwasaki T, et al.. Ephedrine, dopamine, or dobutamine to treat hypotension with propofol during epidural anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47: 237–241.
    1. Gao WF, Zhou H, Chen C, et al.. A comparison of effectiveness of three anesthetic agents in induction of general anesthesia in elderly surgical patients. Chinese Journal of General Practice 2015; 13 : 213–215(in Chinese).
    1. Jor O, Maca J, Koutna J, et al.. Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia: occurrence, risk factors, and therapy. A prospective multicentre observational study. J Anesth 2018; 32: 673–680.
    1. Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FHM, et al.. The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 8–22.
    1. Larsen R, Sonntag H, Schenk HD, et al.. Haemodynamics, coronary blood flow and myocardial metabolism in man: effects of sufentanil and fentanyl. Anaesthesist 1980; 29: 277–279.
    1. Saugel B, Bebert E-J, Briesenick L, et al.. Mechanisms contributing to hypotension after anesthetic induction with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 2021.
    1. Mehandale S, Rajasekhar P. Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension following propofol induction - a prospective observational study. Indian J Anaesth 2017; 61: 990.
    1. Oliveira-Paula GH, Coeli-Lacchini FB, Ferezin LP, et al.. Arginase ii polymorphisms modify the hypotensive responses to propofol by affecting nitric oxide bioavailability. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77: 869–877.
    1. Purushothaman SS, Alex A, Kesavan R, et al.. Ultrasound measurement of inferior vena cava collapsibility as a tool to predict propofol-induced hypotension. Anesth Essays Res 2020; 14: 199–202.
    1. Uysal AI, Altiparmak B, Korkmaz TM, et al.. The effect of preoperative anxiety level on mean platelet volume and propofol consumption. BMC Anesthesiol 2020; 20: 34.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner