A multicentre single arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and letrozole plus dalpiciclib for triple-positive breast cancer

Nan Niu, Fang Qiu, Qianshi Xu, Guijin He, Xi Gu, Wenbin Guo, Dianlong Zhang, Zhigao Li, Yi Zhao, Yong Li, Ke Li, Hao Zhang, Peili Zhang, Yuanxi Huang, Gangling Zhang, Hongbin Han, Zhengang Cai, Pengfei Li, Hong Xu, Guanglei Chen, Jinqi Xue, Xiaofan Jiang, Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Jinshi Li, Yu Zhao, Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury, Shiwen Huo, Huajun Li, Guy Jerusalem, Domenico Tripodi, Tong Liu, Xinyu Zheng, Caigang Liu, Nan Niu, Fang Qiu, Qianshi Xu, Guijin He, Xi Gu, Wenbin Guo, Dianlong Zhang, Zhigao Li, Yi Zhao, Yong Li, Ke Li, Hao Zhang, Peili Zhang, Yuanxi Huang, Gangling Zhang, Hongbin Han, Zhengang Cai, Pengfei Li, Hong Xu, Guanglei Chen, Jinqi Xue, Xiaofan Jiang, Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Jinshi Li, Yu Zhao, Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury, Shiwen Huo, Huajun Li, Guy Jerusalem, Domenico Tripodi, Tong Liu, Xinyu Zheng, Caigang Liu

Abstract

Current therapies for HER2-positive breast cancer have limited efficacy in patients with triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). We conduct a multi-center single-arm phase 2 trial to test the efficacy and safety of an oral neoadjuvant therapy with pyrotinib, letrozole and dalpiciclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) in patients with treatment-naïve, stage II-III TPBC with a Karnofsky score of ≥70 (NCT04486911). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axilla. The secondary endpoints include residual cancer burden (RCB)-0 or RCB-I, objective response rate (ORR), breast pCR (bpCR), safety and changes in molecular targets (Ki67) from baseline to surgery. Following 5 cycles of 4-week treatment, the results meet the primary endpoint with a pCR rate of 30.4% (24 of 79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 21.3-41.3). RCB-0/I is 55.7% (95% CI, 44.7-66.1). ORR is 87.4%, (95% CI, 78.1-93.2) and bpCR is 35.4% (95% CI, 25.8-46.5). The mean Ki67 expression reduces from 40.4% at baseline to 17.9% (P < 0.001) at time of surgery. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events are neutropenia, leukopenia, and diarrhoea. There is no serious adverse event- or treatment-related death. This fully oral, chemotherapy-free, triplet combined therapy has the potential to be an alternative neoadjuvant regimen for patients with TPBC.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Trial profile.
Fig. 1. Trial profile.
Treatment summary and data collection of study participants.
Fig. 2. Exploratory subgroup analyses of pCR…
Fig. 2. Exploratory subgroup analyses of pCR by baseline factors.
Data are presented as pCR rate (%) and 95% CI. The black squares indicate the pCR rates following stratifications. pCR pathological complete response, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IHC immunohistochemistry, FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization, ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, CI confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3. Ki-67 expression at baseline and…
Fig. 3. Ki-67 expression at baseline and surgery.
a Individual data (n = 48). b Mean percentages of Ki-67 expressing tumor cells of each group (n = 48). Statistical analysis was performed by paired two-sided t-test. The Ki-67 expression in 31 out of 79 patients was not assessable due to the lack of detectable tumor cells in the surgical samples (n = 30) or not undergoing surgery (n = 1). For box plots, the center lines are group medians; the upper and lower limits of the box are the 1st and 3rd quartile, and the whiskers show minimum and maximum values. CI confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4. Results of health-related quality of…
Fig. 4. Results of health-related quality of life questionnaires in QLQ-C30 over time.
a Mean scores of global health status and functioning subscales in QLQ-C30. b Mean scores of functioning subscales in QLQ-BR23. QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire-core module, QLQ-BR23 quality of life questionnaire-breast cancer module. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Choong G, Cullen G, O’Sullivan C. Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:355–374. doi: 10.3322/caac.21634.
    1. Zhao S, et al. Molecular portraits and trastuzumab responsiveness of estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-positive breast cancer. Theranostics. 2019;9:4935–4945. doi: 10.7150/thno.35730.
    1. Vici P, et al. Triple positive breast cancer: a distinct subtype? Cancer Treat. Rev. 2015;41:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.12.005.
    1. Gianni L, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:25–32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70336-9.
    1. Li L, et al. Clinical and genetic predictive models for the prediction of pathological complete response to optimize the effectiveness for trastuzumab based chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:592393. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.592393.
    1. Wu VS, Kanaya N, Lo C, Mortimer J, Chen SA. From bench to bedside: What do we know about hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer? J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015;153:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.05.005.
    1. Schettini F, et al. Hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: where we are now and where we are going. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016;46:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.012.
    1. Rimawi M, et al. Multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab with hormonal therapy and without chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: TBCRC 006. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:1726–1731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8027.
    1. Rimawi M, et al. TBCRC023: a randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial of lapatinib plus trastuzumab without chemotherapy for 12 versus 24 weeks in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:821–827. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0851.
    1. Goel S, et al. Overcoming therapeutic resistance in HER2-positive breast cancers with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:255–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.006.
    1. Tolaney S, et al. Abemaciclib plus trastuzumab with or without fulvestrant versus trastuzumab plus standard-of-care chemotherapy in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (monarcHER): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:763–775. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30112-1.
    1. Xu B, et al. Dalpiciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: a randomized, phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1904–1909. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01562-9.
    1. Xu B, et al. Pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:351–360. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30702-6.
    1. Long F, et al. Preclinical characterization of SHR6390, a novel CDK 4/6 inhibitor, in vitro and in human tumor xenograft models. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:1420–1430. doi: 10.1111/cas.13957.
    1. Zhang J, et al. Dalpiciclib combined with pyrotinib and letrozole in women with her2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (LORDSHIPS): a phase Ib study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:775081. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.775081.
    1. Shao Z, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for patients with early or locally advanced ERBB2-positive breast cancer in Asia: the PEONY phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:e193692. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3692.
    1. Cortes J, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:1143–1154. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115022.
    1. Gianni L, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in HER2-positive, ER-positive breast cancer (NA-PHER2): an exploratory, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:249–256. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30001-9.
    1. Symmans, W. et al. Assessment of residual cancer burden and event-free survival in neoadjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: an analysis of data from the I-SPY2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol.7, 1654–1663 (2021).
    1. von Minckwitz G, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:1796–1804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595.
    1. Dowsett M, et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1656–1664. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr393.
    1. Johnston S, et al. Randomized phase II study evaluating palbociclib in addition to letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: PALLET trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:178–189. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01624.
    1. Hurvitz SA, et al. Potent cell-cycle inhibition and upregulation of immune response with abemaciclib and anastrozole in neoMONARCH, phase II neoadjuvant study in HR(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:566–580. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1425.
    1. Curigliano G, et al. Ribociclib plus letrozole in early breast cancer: a presurgical, window-of-opportunity study. Breast. 2016;28:191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.06.008.
    1. Biganzoli L, et al. Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:e327–e340. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30741-5.
    1. Munhoz R, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian function preservation in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:65–73. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3251.
    1. Hurvitz S, et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:115–126. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30716-7.
    1. Schneeweiss A, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA) Ann. Oncol. 2013;24:2278–2284. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt182.
    1. Symmans W, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:4414–4422. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823.
    1. Sprangers MAG, Bonnetain F. EORTC QLQ-C30. (Springer, Netherlands, 2014).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner