Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights

Wei-Ting Wu, Kamal Mezian, Ondřej Naňka, Lan-Rong Chen, Vincenzo Ricci, Chih-Peng Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Levent Özçakar, Wei-Ting Wu, Kamal Mezian, Ondřej Naňka, Lan-Rong Chen, Vincenzo Ricci, Chih-Peng Lin, Ke-Vin Chang, Levent Özçakar

Abstract

Objectives: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection.

Methods: SCN distance relative to the posterior superior iliac spines was measured and compared with ultrasound findings in asymptomatic volunteers. The CSA of the SCN, pressure-pain threshold, and pain measurements were obtained from asymptomatic controls and patients with SCN entrapment at various time points after hydrodissection (with 1 mL of 50% dextrose, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine, and 5 mL of 1% normal saline) in the short-axis view.

Results: Twenty sides of 10 formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The SCN locations on the iliac crest did not differ from the ultrasound findings in 30 asymptomatic volunteers. The average CSA of the SCN across different branches and sites ranged between 4.69-5.67 mm2 and did not vary across different segments/branches or pain statuses. Initial treatment success was observed in 77.7% (n = 28) of 36 patients receiving hydrodissection due to SCN entrapment. A group with initial treatment success experienced symptom recurrence in 25% (n = 7) of cases, and those with recurrent pain had a higher prevalence of scoliosis than those without symptom recurrence.

Conclusions: Ultrasonography effectively localizes SCN branches on the iliac crest, whereby increased nerve CSA is not useful for diagnosis. Most patients benefit from ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection; however, those with scoliosis may experience symptom recurrence and whether structured rehabilitation can reduce recurrence post-injection should be considered as one perspective in future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04478344). Registered on 20 July 2020, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04478344?cond=Superior+Cluneal+Nerve&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1 . Critical relevance statement Ultrasound imaging accurately locates SCN branches on the iliac crest, while enlargement of the CSA is not useful in diagnosing SCN entrapment; however, approximately 80% of SCN entrapment cases respond positively to ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection.

Keywords: Dextrose; Hydro-dissection; Low back pain; Neuropathy; Sonography.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individual in control of the content of this article.

© 2023. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the cadaveric study (track 1), human volunteer study (track 2) and clinical trial (track 3) of ultrasound (US) guided injection for the superior cluneal nerves (SCN). PSIS, posterior superior iliac spine; CSA, cross-sectional area; PTT, pain pressure threshold; VAS, visual analogue scale of pain; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A A, B, C and D inside the squares correspond to probe positioning for the subgraphs of A, B, C and D for scanning of the superior cluneal nerves (yellow lines and black arrowheads). B The probe is placed in the horizontal plane over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and (C) is then relocated more cranially to see the medial branch of the superior cluneal nerve embedded underneath the thoracolumbar fascia (white dashed line). D Moving the probe more cranially, the superior cluneal nerve is seen over the erector spinae muscle. E Shifting the probe more laterally, the three branches of the superior clunear nerve are identified along the posterior iliac crest (PIC). F Ultrasound guided hydrodissection is performed for the superior cluneal nerves using the in-plane, medial-to-lateral approach. MU, multifidus; GMAX, gluteus maximus; LO, longissimus; IC, iliocostalis; arrows, needle trajectory
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A The medial branch of the superior cluneal nerve was stained by methylene blue following ultrasound guided injection on the cadavers. B The distance between the superior cluneal nerves over the iliac crest (white dots) and the posterior superior iliac spine (green dot) was measured along the horizontal and vertical axes (dashed lines)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The mean value and 95% confidence interval of the distance between the superior cluneal nerves over the iliac crest and the posterior superior iliac spine on the (A) horizontal and (B) vertical axes. C., cadaver; V., asymptomatic volunteers; Rt., right; Lt., left; M., medial branch; I., intermediate branch; L., lateral branch; X., horizontal axis; Y., vertical axis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A Visual analogue scale of pain and (B) Oswestry Disability Index at baseline, post-injection 1st and 3rd months for each group. Group 1, who did not respond to the initial treatment; Group 2, who initially responded to treatment but experienced symptom recurrence; and Group 3, who responded well to treatment and did not experience symptom recurrence

References

    1. Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
    1. Kuniya H, Aota Y, Kawai T, Kaneko K, Konno T, Saito T. Prospective study of superior cluneal nerve disorder as a potential cause of low back pain and leg symptoms. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:139. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0139-7.
    1. Karl HW, Helm S, Trescot AM. Superior and middle cluneal nerve entrapment: a cause of low back and radicular pain. Pain Physician. 2022;25:E503–e521.
    1. Ricci V, Özçakar L. Ultrasound imaging for the medial branches of the superior cluneal nerve: optimal visibility at the "fatty tunnel". Pain Pract. 2020;20:338–339. doi: 10.1111/papr.12852.
    1. Wu WT, Mezian K, Nanka O, Chang KV, Ozcakar L. Ultrasonographic imaging and guided intervention for the superior cluneal nerve: a narrative pictorial review. Pain Physician. 2022;25:E657–E667.
    1. Bodner G, Platzgummer H, Meng S, Brugger PC, Gruber GM, Lieba-Samal D. Successful identification and assessment of the superior cluneal nerves with high-resolution sonography. Pain Physician. 2016;19:197–202.
    1. Wu WT, Hsu YC, Mezian K, Ricci V, Chang KV, Ozcakar L. Ultrasound imaging and guided intervention for the middle cluneal nerve. Med Ultrason. 2023;25:119–120. doi: 10.11152/mu-4032.
    1. Chang KV, Wu WT. Is it possible to exactly visualize the superior cluneal nerve using ultrasound imaging? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100731.
    1. Fan K, Cheng C, Gong WY. A simple and novel ultrasound-guided approach for superior cluneal nerves block. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40:100838. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100838.
    1. Nielsen TD, Moriggl B, Barckman J, et al. Randomized trial of ultrasound-guided superior cluneal nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100174.
    1. Chang KV, Hsu SH, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasonographic technique for imaging and injecting the superior cluneal nerve. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96:e117–e118. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000642.
    1. Jochum D, Iohom G, Diarra DP, Loughnane F, Dupré LJ, Bouaziz H. An objective assessment of nerve stimulators used for peripheral nerve blockade*. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:557–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04645.x.
    1. van Emden MW, Geurts JJG, Schober P, Schwarte LA. Suitability and realism of the novel Fix for Life cadaver model for videolaryngoscopy and fibreoptic tracheoscopy in airway management training. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:203. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01121-8.
    1. Wu WT, Chang KV, Mezian K, Naňka O, Lin CP, Özçakar L. Basis of shoulder nerve entrapment syndrome: an ultrasonographic study exploring factors influencing cross-sectional area of the suprascapular nerve. Front Neurol. 2018;9:902. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00902.
    1. Escalona-Marfil C, Coda A, Ruiz-Moreno J, Riu-Gispert LM, Gironès X. Validation of an electronic visual analog scale mhealth tool for acute pain assessment: prospective cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e13468. doi: 10.2196/13468.
    1. Chen L, Perera RS, Radojcic MR, et al. Association of lumbar spine radiographic changes with severity of back pain-related disability among middle-aged, community-dwelling women. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2110715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10715.
    1. Koslosky E, Gendelberg D. Classification in brief: the meyerding classification system of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:1125–1130. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001153.
    1. Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ, Lin CJ, Sun YN. Cobb angle measurement of spine from x-ray images using convolutional neural network. Comput Math Methods Med. 2019;2019:6357171. doi: 10.1155/2019/6357171.
    1. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2940–2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
    1. Cumming G, Finch S. A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001;61:532–574. doi: 10.1177/0013164401614002.
    1. LiangZeger K-YSL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13.
    1. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:205–207. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205.
    1. Ricci V, Özçakar L. Ultrasound imaging of the superior cluneal nerve: Sonoanatomy of the osteo-fibrous tunnel revisited. Clin Anat. 2019;32:466–467. doi: 10.1002/ca.23287.
    1. Lin TY, Chang KV, Wu WT, Ozcakar L. Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: an umbrella review. J Neurol. 2022;269:4663–4675. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11201-z.
    1. Chang KV, Wu WT, Han DS, Ozcakar L. Ulnar nerve cross-sectional area for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of ultrasonographic measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2018;99:743–757. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.467.
    1. Chang KV, Mezian K, Nanka O, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the cutaneous nerves of the extremities and relevant entrapment syndromes: from anatomy to clinical implications. J Clin Med. 2018;7:457. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110457.
    1. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221:507–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x.
    1. Isu T, Kim K, Morimoto D, Iwamoto N. Superior and middle cluneal nerve entrapment as a cause of low back pain. Neurospine. 2018;15:25–32. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836024.012.
    1. Whyte Ferguson L. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the Tethered Spine III: Is fascial spiral the key? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21:948–971. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.01.013.
    1. Lin CP, Chang KV, Huang YK, Wu WT, Ozcakar L. Regenerative injections including 5% dextrose and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020;13:49. doi: 10.3390/ph13030049.
    1. Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018;84:601–610. doi: 10.1002/ana.25332.
    1. Garg B, Mehta N, Bansal T, Malhotra R. EOS® imaging: concept and current applications in spinal disorders. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:786–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.012.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner