Prognostic implications of systemic immune-inflammation index in myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry

Jiachen Luo, Xiaoming Qin, Xingxu Zhang, Yiwei Zhang, Fang Yuan, Wentao Shi, Baoxin Liu, Yidong Wei, NOAFCAMI-SH Registry Investigators, Jiachen Luo, Xiaoming Qin, Xingxu Zhang, Yiwei Zhang, Fang Yuan, Wentao Shi, Baoxin Liu, Yidong Wei, NOAFCAMI-SH Registry Investigators

Abstract

Background: It is well-known that systemic inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) is a novel index that is used for the characterization of the severity of systemic inflammation. Recent studies have identified the high SII level as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with AMI. We aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of SII in AMI patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: We included 2111 patients with AMI from February 2014 to March 2018. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause death and cardiovascular (CV) death. Multiple imputation was used for missing covariates.

Results: Of 2111 patients (mean age: 65.2 ± 12.2 years, 77.5% were males) analyzed, 789 (37.4%) had DM. Generalized additive model analyses showed that as the SII increased, the C-reactive protein and peak TnT elevated while the LVEF declined, and these associations were similar in patients with and without DM. During a median of 2.5 years of follow-up, 210 all-cause deaths and 154 CV deaths occurred. When treating the SII as a continuous variable, a higher log-transformed SII was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.02-2.43) and CV mortality (HR: 1.85, 95%CI 1.12-3.05), and such an association was also significant in the diabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 2.90 [1.40-6.01] and 3.28 [1.43-7.57], respectively) while not significant in the nondiabetics (Pinteraction for all-cause death and CV death were 0.019 and 0.049, respectively). Additionally, compared to patients with the lowest tertiles of SII, those with the highest tertiles of SII possessed significantly higher all-cause mortality (HR: 1.82, 95%CI 1.19-2.79) and CV mortality (HR: 1.82, 95%CI 1.19-2.79) after multivariable adjustment, and this relationship remained pronounced in the diabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 2.00 [1.13-3.55] and 2.09 [1.10-3.98], respectively) but was not observed in the nondiabetics (HRs and 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death were 1.21 [0.75-1.97] and 1.60 [0.89-2.90], respectively). Our restricted cubic splines analyses indicated a pronounced linear association between SII and mortality only in diabetics.

Conclusions: In AMI patients with DM, high SII is an independent predictor of poor survival and may be helpful for patient's risk stratification.

Keywords: Diabetes; Generalized additive model; Myocardial infarction; Restricted cubic spline; Systemic immune-inflammation index.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.0 bcv

© 2024. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patient inclusion and exclusion for this study. AMI, acute myocardial infarction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with inflammation, myocardial injury, and cardiac function assessed with GAM. The generalized additive models (GAM) show a nearly linear association between the log-transformed SII level and CRP, peak TnT, and LVEF levels in the overall cohort, and in the diabetic and nondiabetic cohorts, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals are in shading. The navyblue dots indicate the whole cohort, and the green and red dots indicate the diabetic and nondiabetic cohorts, respectively. CRP C-reactive protein, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Primary and secondary endpoints. Long-term all-cause mortality and CV mortality in the whole cohort (A, D), and in the diabetic (B, E), and nondiabetic (C, F) cohorts according to the tertiles of SII level, respectively. CV cardiovascular
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause death and CV death by SII on a continuous scale in the whole cohort, and in the diabetic and nondiabetic cohorts. HRs with 95%CIs for all-cause death and CV death, accounting for SII on a continuous scale, are from Cox regression restricted cubic splines (RCS). Orange areas show the distribution of SII levels. The solid red line in each figure indicates the HR, and the dashed red lines indicate the 95%CI. Covariates in the multivariable RCS model included: age, sex, current smoker, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, CKD, heart failure, myocardial infarction), STEMI, Killip > I, primary PCI, peak TnT, CRP, serum creatinine, LVEF, as well as medications (aspirin, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, β-blocker). CKD chronic kidney disease, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention

References

    1. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation. 2001;104(22):2746–2753. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099487.
    1. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119(1):91–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303577.
    1. Murphy AJ, Tall AR. Disordered haematopoiesis and athero-thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(14):1113–1121. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv718.
    1. Shetelig C, Limalanathan S, Hoffmann P, et al. Association of IL-8 with infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(2):187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.053.
    1. Henein MY, Vancheri S, Longo G, Vancheri F. The role of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):12906. doi: 10.3390/ijms232112906.
    1. Shahrivari M, Wise E, Resende M, et al. Peripheral blood cytokine levels after acute myocardial infarction: IL-1β- and IL-6-related impairment of bone marrow function. Circ Res. 2017;120(12):1947–1957. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309947.
    1. Huang S, Frangogiannis NG. Anti-inflammatory therapies in myocardial infarction: failures, hopes and challenges. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175(9):1377–1400. doi: 10.1111/bph.14155.
    1. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497–2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912388.
    1. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914.
    1. Morton AC, Rothman AM, Greenwood JP, et al. The effect of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist therapy on markers of inflammation in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: the MRC-ILA Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(6):377–384. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu272.
    1. Hudson MP, Armstrong PW, Ruzyllo W, et al. Effects of selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (PG-116800) to prevent ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: results of the PREMIER (Prevention of Myocardial Infarction Early Remodeling) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.055.
    1. Ridker PM. From C-reactive protein to interleukin-6 to interleukin-1: moving upstream to identify novel targets for atheroprotection. Circ Res. 2016;118(1):145–156. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306656.
    1. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):6212–6222. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0442.
    1. Wang Z, Qin Z, Yuan R, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic marker for advanced chronic heart failure with renal dysfunction. ESC Heart Fail. 2023;10(1):478–491. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14217.
    1. Xu M, Chen R, Liu L, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index and incident cardiovascular diseases among middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults: The Dongfeng-Tongji cohort study. Atherosclerosis. 2021;323:20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.012.
    1. Pradhan AD, Ridker PM. Do atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes share a common inflammatory basis? Eur Heart J. 2002;23(11):831–834. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.3052.
    1. Malmberg K, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC, et al. Impact of diabetes on long-term prognosis in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the OASIS (Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes) Registry. Circulation. 2000;102(9):1014–1019. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.9.1014.
    1. Fei Q, Ma H, Zou J, et al. Metformin protects against ischaemic myocardial injury by alleviating autophagy-ROS-NLRP3-mediated inflammatory response in macrophages. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020;145:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.05.016.
    1. Paolisso P, Bergamaschi L, Santulli G, et al. Infarct size, inflammatory burden, and admission hyperglycemia in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with SGLT2-inhibitors: a multicenter international registry. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01506-8.
    1. Luo J, Xu S, Li H, et al. Long-term impact of the burden of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry. Europace. 2021;23(2):196–204. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa234.
    1. Luo J, Xu S, Li H, et al. Long-term impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction on heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(5):2762–2772. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12872.
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038.
    1. Rubin D. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.
    1. Fullerton JN, Gilroy DW. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(8):551–567. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.39.
    1. Rurik JG, Aghajanian H, Epstein JA. Immune cells and immunotherapy for cardiac injury and repair. Circ Res. 2021;128(11):1766–1779. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318005.
    1. Aksakal E, Aksu U, Birdal O, et al. Role of systemic immune-inflammatory index in predicting the development of in-hospital malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction. Angiology. 2022;74:881. doi: 10.1177/00033197221121435.
    1. Dolu AK, Karayiğit O, Ozkan C, Çelik MC, Kalçık M. Relationship between intracoronary thrombus burden and systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol. 2023;78(1):72–79. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2035082.
    1. Orhan AL, Şaylık F, Çiçek V, et al. Evaluating the systemic immune-inflammation index for in-hospital and long-term mortality in elderly non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(7):1687–1695. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02103-1.
    1. Zhang N, Aiyasiding X, Li WJ, Liao HH, Tang QZ. Neutrophil degranulation and myocardial infarction. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12964-022-00824-4.
    1. Totani L, Evangelista V. Platelet-leukocyte interactions in cardiovascular disease and beyond. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(12):2357–2361. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207480.
    1. Li Q, Ma X, Shao Q, et al. Prognostic impact of multiple lymphocyte-based inflammatory indices in acute coronary syndrome patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:811790. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.811790.
    1. Biccirè FG, Farcomeni A, Gaudio C, et al. D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and metanalysis. Thromb J. 2021;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12959-021-00354-y.
    1. Marfella R, Di Filippo C, Portoghese M, et al. Tight glycemic control reduces heart inflammation and remodeling during acute myocardial infarction in hyperglycemic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(16):1425–1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.041.
    1. Karima M, Kantarci A, Ohira T, et al. Enhanced superoxide release and elevated protein kinase C activity in neutrophils from diabetic patients: association with periodontitis. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78(4):862–870. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1004583.
    1. Wong SL, Demers M, Martinod K, et al. Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):815–819. doi: 10.1038/nm.3887.
    1. Menegazzo L, Ciciliot S, Poncina N, et al. NETosis is induced by high glucose and associated with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52(3):497–503. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0676-x.
    1. Njeim R, Azar WS, Fares AH, et al. NETosis contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetes and its complications. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;65(4):R65–r76. doi: 10.1530/JME-20-0128.
    1. Josefs T, Barrett TJ, Brown EJ, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote macrophage inflammation and impair atherosclerosis resolution in diabetic mice. JCI Insight. 2020;5(7).
    1. de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, et al. Association between plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003;107(5):690–695. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000049742.68848.99.
    1. Gabriel AS, Martinsson A, Wretlind B, Ahnve S. IL-6 levels in acute and post-myocardial infarction: their relation to CRP levels, infarction size, left ventricular systolic function, and heart failure. Eur J Intern Med. 2004;15(8):523–528. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2004.07.013.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner