Early Intervention in Psychosis in Young People: A Population and Public Health Perspective

Ashok Malla, Patrick McGorry, Ashok Malla, Patrick McGorry

Abstract

Over the past two decades or more, the creation of early intervention services (EIS) for psychoses has been regarded as one of the most significant developments in the reform of mental health services. The development of EIS is based on evidence of their superior effectiveness on multiple domains compared with regular care and the well-established relationship between delay in treatment of psychosis and outcome. The benefits of EIS may, however, be underutilized because of a patchy implementation even within high-income countries, low attention to actively reducing delays in treatment, inadequate knowledge about the length and dose of EIS required, and a lack of a population perspective in research and service planning. In this commentary, we offer some suggestions of how to address these challenges.

References

    1. Winslow CE. The untilled fields of public health. Science. 1920;51(1306):23–33.
    1. Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(1):19–28.
    1. McGrath J, Saha S, Welham J, El Saadi O, MacCauley C, Chant D. A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology. BMC Med. 2004;2(1):13.
    1. Lally J, Ajnakina O, Stubbs B et al. Remission and recovery from first-episode psychosis in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcome studies. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211(6):350–358.
    1. Hjorthoj C, Sturup AE, McGrath JJ, Nordentoft M. Years of potential life lost and life expectancy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(4):295–301.
    1. Cloutier M, Aigbogun MS, Guerin A et al. The economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2013. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(6):764–771.
    1. Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A et al. Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):555–565.
    1. Penttila M, Jaaskelainen E, Hirvonen N, Isohanni M, Miettunen J. Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(2):88–94.
    1. Harrison G, Hopper K, Craig T et al. Recovery from psychotic illness: a 15- and 25-year international follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178(6):506–517.
    1. Shah JL, Crawford A, Mustafa SS, Iyer SN, Joober R, Malla AK. Is the clinical high-risk state a valid concept? Retrospective examination in a first-episode psychosis sample. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(10):1046–1052.
    1. Addington D, Birchwood M, Jones P et al. Fidelity scales and performance measures to support implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(6):1235–1242.
    1. Hastrup LH, Kronborg C, Bertelsen M et al. Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in first-episode psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial (the OPUS study) Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(1):35–41.
    1. McGorry PD, Ratheesh A, O’Donoghue B. Early Intervention—an implementation challenge for 21st century mental health care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(6):545–546.
    1. Kirkbride JB, Jackson D, Perez J et al. A population-level prediction tool for the incidence of first-episode psychosis: translational epidemiology based on cross-sectional data. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2):e001998.
    1. Guidance to Support the Introduction of Access and Waiting Time Standards for Mental Health Services in 2015/16. London, UK: National Health Service; 2015.
    1. Cotter J, Zabel E, French P, Yung AR. Prolonged duration of untreated psychosis: a problem that needs addressing. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(3):263–268.
    1. McGorry PD, Edwards J, Mihalopoulos C, Harrigan SM, Jackson HJ. EPPIC: an evolving system of early detection and optimal management. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):305–326.
    1. Melle I, Larsen TK, Haahr U et al. Reducing the duration of untreated first-episode psychosis: effects on clinical presentation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(2):143–150.
    1. Kane JM, Robinson DG, Schooler NR et al. Comprehensive versus usual community care for first episode psychosis: two-year outcomes from The NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(4):362–372.
    1. Bertolote J, McGorry P. Early intervention and recovery for young people with early psychosis: consensus statement. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2005;48:s116–s119.
    1. Norman RM, Malla AK, Verdi MB, Hassall LD, Fazekas C. Understanding delay in treatment for first-episode psychosis. Psychol Med. 2004;34(2):255–266.
    1. Malla A, Iyer S, McGorry P et al. From early intervention in psychosis to youth mental health reform: a review of the evolution and transformation of mental health services for young people. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(3):319–326.
    1. Anderson KK, Norman R, MacDougall A et al. Effectiveness of early psychosis intervention: comparison of service users and nonusers in population-based health administrative data. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(5):443–452.
    1. Malla A, Joober R, Iyer S et al. Comparing three‐year extension of early intervention service to regular care following two years of early intervention service in first‐episode psychosis: a randomized single blind clinical trial. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):278–286.
    1. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R et al. On the HORYZON: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2013;143(1):143–149.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner