Impact of antiviral AV2 in the topical treatment of HPV-associated lesions of the cervix: Results of a phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial

Alex Baleka Mutombo, Rahma Tozin, Hollande Kanyiki, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Yves Jacquemyn, Alex Baleka Mutombo, Rahma Tozin, Hollande Kanyiki, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Yves Jacquemyn

Abstract

Background: Non-surgical topical therapies have been assessed in the treatment of precancerous lesions of the cervix. Their use can offer logistical and feasibility advantages in low-resource settings. Antiviral AV2® is a mixture of natural essential oils (eugenol, carvone, nerolidol, geraniol) in olive oil, and has a broad spectrum anti-viral activity. In a phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT), AV2® proved effective in reducing the size of cervical lesions associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). The purpose of the present study was to further evaluate the efficacy of AV2 over placebo in the topical treatment of HPV-associated cervical lesions.

Methods: Women aged 25 years and older were included in this phase 3 RCT. Cytology screening, HPV testing and visual inspection of the cervix with 5% acetic acid (VIA) were performed on all participants. VIA-positive women were randomized to one of two groups to receive treatment by either AV2® or placebo. The treatment consisted of 2 puffs of spray of the investigational drug directed to the cervix. Participants were subjected to repeat examinations two months and six months later for assessment of outcomes. The primary outcome was the change of lesions on VIA at 2 months after application of the investigational drug. Secondary outcomes were: HPV clearance and cytologic regression at 2 months and 6 months, and number of participants with AEs.

Results: A total 327 VIA positive women were randomized in two groups (168 in AV2 group and 159 in placebo group). Women in the 2 groups were similar with respect to baseline demographics and clinical characteristics. At 2 months, regression of lesions on VIA was observed in 127 (89.4%) out of 142 women in AV2 group compared to 120 (91.6%) out of 131 women in placebo group (P = 0.7). On cytology, regression of lesions occurred in 14 (56%) out of 25 women in the AV2 arm and in 13 (48.1) out of 27 women in the placebo arm (p = 0.7), and HPV clearance rates were 34.1% and 35% in AV2 group and placebo group respectively (p = 0.8). At 6 months cytologic regression was observed in 64.7% of women in AV2 group and 45.8% in placebo group (p = 0.2), while HPV clearance occurred in 11 (51.9%) out of 17 women in AV2 arm versus 11 (34.4%) in placebo arm (p = 0.3).Some local side effects (burning, itching, irritation) were similarly noted in the 2 groups (p-values = 0.169, 0.623 and 0.172 respectively) but they were mild and transitory.

Conclusion: A topical application of AV2 onto the cervix can induce the regression of cervical precancerous lesions, but its efficacy does not significantly differ with that of placebo. The discrepancy between the expected and the recorded sample size as well as the huge number of lost to follow-up probably impeded the power of analyses, which could be one of the reasons for the lack of difference seen between AV2 and placebo. Further evaluation of the effects of AV2 with different diagnostic methods and treatment regimen and arms is warranted.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02346227 registered on November 8, 2014.

Keywords: Antiviral drug; Cervical precancerous lesions; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Human papillomavirus; Randomized clinical trial.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scheduling of the trial.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart showing the progress through the study.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386.
    1. Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., Jemal A. Cancer in Africa 2012. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014;23:953–966.
    1. Wallin K.L., Wiklund F., Angstrom T. Type-specific persistence of human papillomavirus DNA before the development of invasive cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;341:1633–1638.
    1. Mathew A., George P.S. Trends in incidence and mortality rates of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix--worldwide. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP. 2009;10:645–650.
    1. Organization W.H. 2013. WHO Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention. Geneva.
    1. Zhao F.H., Lewkowitz A.K., Chen F. Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012;104:178–188.
    1. Arbyn M., Kyrgiou M., Simoens C. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284.
    1. Chen C., Yang Z., Li Z., Li L. Accuracy of several cervical screening strategies for early detection of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2012;22:908–921.
    1. Luciani S., Gonzales M., Munoz S. Effectiveness of cryotherapy treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2008;101:172–177.
    1. Cinel A., Wittenberg L., Minucci D. Beta-interferon topical treatment in low and high risk cervical lesions. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991;18:91–97.
    1. Grimm C., Polterauer S., Natter C. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with topical imiquimod: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;120:152–159.
    1. Meyskens F.L., Jr., Surwit E., Moon T.E. Enhancement of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II (moderate dysplasia) with topically applied all-trans-retinoic acid: a randomized trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1994;86:539–543.
    1. Rahangdale L., Lippmann Q.K., Garcia K. Topical 5-fluorouracil for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014;210:314–318. e311.
    1. Ruffin M.T., Bailey J.M., Normolle D.P. Low-dose topical delivery of all-trans retinoic acid for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004;13:2148–2152.
    1. Van Pachterbeke C., Bucella D., Rozenberg S. Topical treatment of CIN 2+ by cidofovir: results of a phase II, double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009;115:69–74.
    1. Mutombo A.B., Tozin R., Simoens C. Efficacy of antiviral drug AV2 in the treatment of human papillomavirus-associated precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial in Kinshasa, DR Congo. (KINVAV study) Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017;8:135–139.
    1. Martinez G., Mutombo B.A., Fernandez V. A preliminary study for the treatment of cervical colposcopic lesions with the biological compound AV2. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2017;38:342–345.
    1. Sankaranarayanan R.W.R. IARC Press; Lyon, France: 2003. A Practical Manual on Visual Screening for Cervical Neoplasia.
    1. Sellors J.W.R.S.R. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2003. Colposcopy and Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Beginners' Manual.
    1. Solomon D., Davey D., Kurman R. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2002;287:2114–2119.
    1. Sankaranarayanan R., Nessa A., Esmy P.O., Dangou J.M. Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2012;26:221–232.
    1. Bonsu J.M., Frasso R., Curry A.E. Lessons from the field: the conduct of randomized controlled trials in Botswana. Trials. 2017;18:503.
    1. DeGregorio G., Manga S., Kiyang E. Implementing a fee-for-service cervical cancer screening and treatment program in Cameroon: challenges and opportunities. Oncol. 2017;22:850–859.
    1. Randall T.C., Ghebre R. Challenges in prevention and care delivery for women with cervical cancer in sub-saharan Africa. Front Oncol. 2016;6:160.
    1. Wang S.M., Qiao Y.L. Implementation of cervical cancer screening and prevention in China--challenges and reality. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;45:7–11.
    1. Sankaranarayanan R., Basu P., Wesley R.S. Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa. Int. J. Cancer. 2004;110:907–913.
    1. Sauvaget C., Fayette J.M., Muwonge R. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2011;113:14–24.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner