HbA1c as a predictor of diabetes and as an outcome in the diabetes prevention program: a randomized clinical trial

Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group

Abstract

Objective: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), a standard measure of chronic glycemia for managing diabetes, has been proposed to diagnose diabetes and identify people at risk. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) was a 3.2-year randomized clinical trial of preventing type 2 diabetes with a 10-year follow-up study, the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS). We evaluated baseline HbA1c as a predictor of diabetes and determined the effects of treatments on diabetes defined by an HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol).

Research design and methods: We randomized 3,234 nondiabetic adults at high risk of diabetes to placebo, metformin, or intensive lifestyle intervention and followed them for the development of diabetes as diagnosed by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h postload glucose (2hPG) concentrations (1997 American Diabetes Association [ADA] criteria). HbA1c was measured but not used for study eligibility or outcomes. We now evaluate treatment effects in the 2,765 participants who did not have diabetes at baseline according to FPG, 2hPG, or HbA1c (2010 ADA criteria).

Results: Baseline HbA1c predicted incident diabetes in all treatment groups. Diabetes incidence defined by HbA1c ≥6.5% was reduced by 44% by metformin and 49% by lifestyle during the DPP and by 38% by metformin and 29% by lifestyle throughout follow-up. Unlike the primary DPP and DPPOS findings based on glucose criteria, metformin and lifestyle were similarly effective in preventing diabetes defined by HbA1c.

Conclusions: HbA1c predicted incident diabetes. In contrast to the superiority of the lifestyle intervention on glucose-defined diabetes, metformin and lifestyle interventions had similar effects in preventing HbA1c-defined diabetes. The long-term implications for other health outcomes remain to be determined.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00004992 NCT00038727.

© 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of diabetes (new cases/100 person-years) by baseline HbA1c, where diabetes was determined by 1997 ADA criteria using FPG and 2hPG concentrations or by HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Results are shown for the original masked treatment phase (DPP with mean follow-up of 3.0 years) (A and C) and for the DPP plus long-term follow-up (total follow-up with median follow-up of 9.9 years) (B and D). Met, metformin; Plac, placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of treatment effects on the incidence of diabetes diagnosed by glucose criteria or by HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Results are shown for the original masked treatment phase (DPP) (A) and for the total follow-up period (B). Met, metformin; Plac, placebo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incidence of diabetes diagnosed by glucose criteria or by HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) by baseline age and treatment assignment in men (AD) and women (EH). Results are shown for the original masked treatment phase (DPP) and for the total follow-up period. Met, metformin; Plac, placebo.

References

    1. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:623–634
    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393–403
    1. Knowler WC, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet 2009;374:1677–1686
    1. American Diabetes Association . Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1183–1197
    1. International Expert Committee . International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1327–1334
    1. American Diabetes Association . Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S62–S69
    1. Pajunen P, Peltonen M, Eriksson JG, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study . HbA(1c) in diagnosing and predicting type 2 diabetes in impaired glucose tolerance: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabet Med 2011;28:36–42
    1. Saito T, Watanabe M, Nishida J, et al. Zensharen Study for Prevention of Lifestyle Diseases Group . Lifestyle modification and prevention of type 2 diabetes in overweight Japanese with impaired fasting glucose levels: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1352–1360
    1. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Samith Shetty A, Nanditha A. Predictive value of HbA1c for incident diabetes among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance—analysis of the Indian Diabetes Prevention Programmes. Diabet Med 2012;29:94–98
    1. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, et al. . Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006. Diabetes Care 2010;33:562–568
    1. Kitabchi AE, Temprosa M, Knowler WC, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Role of insulin secretion and sensitivity in the evolution of type 2 diabetes in the diabetes prevention program: effects of lifestyle intervention and metformin. Diabetes 2005;54:2404–2414
    1. Hundal RS, Krssak M, Dufour S, et al. . Mechanism by which metformin reduces glucose production in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2000;49:2063–2069
    1. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Charles M-A, et al. . Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations as diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ 1994;308:1323–1328
    1. Tapp RJ, Tikellis G, Wong TY, Harper CA, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE, Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle Study Group . Longitudinal association of glucose metabolism with retinopathy: results from the Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1349–1354
    1. Colagiuri S, Lee CMY, Wong TY, Balkau B, Shaw JE, Borch-Johnsen K; DETECT-2 Collaboration Writing Group. Glycemic thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy: implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:145–150
    1. Selvin E, Ning Y, Steffes MW, et al. . Glycated hemoglobin and the risk of kidney disease and retinopathy in adults with and without diabetes. Diabetes 2011;60:298–305
    1. Haffner S, Temprosa M, Crandall J, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin on inflammation and coagulation in participants with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2005;54:1566–1572
    1. Orchard TJ, Temprosa M, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study Research Group . Long-term effects of the Diabetes Prevention Program interventions on cardiovascular risk factors: a report from the DPP Outcomes Study. Diabet Med 2013;30:46–55
    1. Hivert MF, Jablonski KA, Perreault L, et al. DIAGRAM Consortium. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Updated genetic score based on 34 confirmed type 2 diabetes loci is associated with diabetes incidence and regression to normoglycemia in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes 2011;60:1340–1348
    1. Franks PW, Jablonski KA, Delahanty LM, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Assessing gene-treatment interactions at the FTO and INSIG2 loci on obesity-related traits in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetologia 2008;51:2214–2223
    1. Pan Q, Delahanty LM, Jablonski KA, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Variation at the melanocortin 4 receptor gene and response to weight-loss interventions in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:E520–E526
    1. Crandall J, Schade D, Ma Y, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . The influence of age on the effects of lifestyle modification and metformin in prevention of diabetes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:1075–1081
    1. Herman WH, Ma Y, Uwaifo G, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2453–2457
    1. Ziemer DC, Kolm P, Weintraub WS, et al. . Glucose-independent, black-white differences in hemoglobin A1c levels: a cross-sectional analysis of 2 studies. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:770–777
    1. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Coresh J, Brancati FL. Racial differences in glycemic markers: a cross-sectional analysis of community-based data. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:303–309
    1. Tsugawa Y, Mukamal KJ, Davis RB, Taylor WC, Wee CC. Should the hemoglobin A1c diagnostic cutoff differ between blacks and whites? A cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:153–159
    1. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, et al. . Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. N Engl J Med 2010;362:800–811
    1. Maruthur NM, Kao WHL, Clark JM, et al. . Does genetic ancestry explain higher values of glycated hemoglobin in African Americans? Diabetes 2011;60:2434–2438
    1. Grimsby JL, Porneala BC, Vassy JL, et al. MAGIC Investigators . Race-ethnic differences in the association of genetic loci with HbA1c levels and mortality in U.S. adults: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). BMC Med Genet 2012;13:30.
    1. Knowler WC. Prevention of type 2 diabetes: comment on “Lifestyle Modification and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Overweight Japanese With Impaired Fasting Glucose Levels.” Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1361–1362

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner