Prognostic Implications of Declining Hemoglobin Content in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Sergio Leonardi, Felice Gragnano, Greta Carrara, Giuseppe Gargiulo, Enrico Frigoli, Pascal Vranckx, Dario Di Maio, Vanessa Spedicato, Emanuele Monda, Luigi Fimiani, Vincenzo Fioretti, Fabrizio Esposito, Marisa Avvedimento, Fabio Magliulo, Attilio Leone, Salvatore Chianese, Michele Franzese, Martina Scalise, Alessandra Schiavo, Paolo Mazzone, Giovanni Esposito, Giuseppe Andò, Paolo Calabrò, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli, Sergio Leonardi, Felice Gragnano, Greta Carrara, Giuseppe Gargiulo, Enrico Frigoli, Pascal Vranckx, Dario Di Maio, Vanessa Spedicato, Emanuele Monda, Luigi Fimiani, Vincenzo Fioretti, Fabrizio Esposito, Marisa Avvedimento, Fabio Magliulo, Attilio Leone, Salvatore Chianese, Michele Franzese, Martina Scalise, Alessandra Schiavo, Paolo Mazzone, Giovanni Esposito, Giuseppe Andò, Paolo Calabrò, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli

Abstract

Background: Contemporary definitions of bleeding endpoints are restricted mostly to clinically overt events. Whether hemoglobin drop per se, with or without overt bleeding, adversely affects the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unclear.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine in the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox) trial the incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of in-hospital hemoglobin drop in patients with ACS managed invasively stratified by the presence of in-hospital bleeding.

Methods: Patients were categorized by the presence and amount of in-hospital hemoglobin drop on the basis of baseline and nadir hemoglobin values and further stratified by the occurrence of adjudicated in-hospital bleeding. Hemoglobin drop was defined as minimal (<3 g/dl), minor (≥3 and <5 g/dl), or major (≥5 g/dl). Using multivariate Cox regression, we modeled the association between hemoglobin drop and mortality in patients with and without overt bleeding.

Results: Among 7,781 patients alive 24 h after randomization with available hemoglobin data, 6,504 patients (83.6%) had hemoglobin drop, of whom 5,756 (88.5%) did not have overt bleeding and 748 (11.5%) had overt bleeding. Among patients without overt bleeding, minor (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 4.24; p = 0.004) and major (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 0.98 to 6.78; p = 0.054) hemoglobin drop were independently associated with higher 1-year mortality. Among patients with overt bleeding, the association of minor and major hemoglobin drop with 1-year mortality was directionally similar but had wider CIs (minor: HR: 3.53 [95% CI: 1.06 to 11.79]; major: HR: 13.32 [95% CI: 3.01 to 58.98]).

Conclusions: Among patients with ACS managed invasively, in-hospital hemoglobin drop ≥3 g/dl, even in the absence of overt bleeding, is common and is independently associated with increased risk for 1-year mortality. (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox; NCT01433627).

Keywords: acute coronary syndromes; bleeding; hemoglobin; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosures The MATRIX trial was sponsored by Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva (a nonprofit organization), which received grant support from The Medicines Company and Terumo. This substudy did not receive any direct or indirect funding. Dr. Leonardi has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Chiesi; and has received personal fees from Bayer outside the submitted work. Dr. Gragnano has received research grant support from the European Society of Cardiology outside the submitted work. Dr. Gargiulo has received consultant fees from Daiichi-Sankyo outside the submitted work. Dr. Vranckx has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Bayer Health Care outside the submitted work. Dr. Frigoli is affiliated with CTU Bern, University of Bern, which has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees. However, CTU Bern is involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of clinical studies funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations. In particular, pharmaceutical and medical device companies provide direct funding to some of these studies. For an up-to-date list of CTU Bern’s conflicts of interest, visit the University of Bern Web site (and see Research, Declaration of Interest). Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed outside the submitted work. Dr. Valgimigli has received grants and personal fees from Abbott, Terumo, AstraZeneca; has received personal fees from Chiesi, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Alvimedica, Biosensors, and Idorsia; and has received grants from Medicure outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner