Circulating tumor cells correlate with patterns of recurrence in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Giandomenico Roviello, Silvia Paola Corona, Alberto Bonetta, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Daniele Generali, Giandomenico Roviello, Silvia Paola Corona, Alberto Bonetta, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Daniele Generali

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and patterns of recurrence in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The study involved patients with histologically confirmed, advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma, who were tested for CTCs (Veridex®) when they developed recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation between 2008 and 2014. Forty-two prostate cancer patients were evaluated. CTCs were detected in 14 out of 42 (33.3%) patients (Group A), while the remaining 28 (66.7%) showed undetectable levels of CTCs (Group B). The mean prostate-specific antigen value was higher in Group A in comparison to Group B (6.2 vs 3.3 ng/dL) (P=0.48). Presence of bone metastases alone or along with nodal metastases was more common in Group A (57.1%) in comparison to Group B (25%) (P=0.04). In a univariate analysis, the presence of CTCs at diagnosis correlated with the development of bone recurrence (OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.0-15.9; P=0.05). Even if the study enrolled only a small number of patients, the detection of CTCs in the blood appears to correlate with the pattern of progression in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, suggesting a possible role in anticipating recurrence at the bone in men with higher tumor load. Further prospective studies are warranted in this setting.

Keywords: CTCs; biochemical failure; bone metastasis; prostate cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interests in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Occurrence of CTCs. Note: Red bars indicate the CTC-positive patients; blue bars indicate the CTC-negative patients. Abbreviation: CTC, circulating tumor cell.

References

    1. Amling CL, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Seay TM, Slezak J, Zincke H. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. J Urol. 2000;164(1):101–105.
    1. Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostatecancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1358–1367.
    1. Chism DB, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, Feigenberg SJ, Pollack A. A comparison of the single and double factor high risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(2):380–385.
    1. Lee AK, D’Amico AV. Utility of prostate-specific antigen kinetics in addition to clinical factors in the selection of patients for salvage local therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(32):8192–8197.
    1. Mason MD, Sydes MR, Glaholm J, et al. Oral sodium clodronate for nonmetastatic prostate cancer – results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial: Medical Research Council PR04 (ISRCTN61384873) J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(10):765–776.
    1. Zhang T, Armstrong AJ. Clinical utility of circulating tumor cells in advanced prostate cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18(1):3.
    1. de Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, et al. Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(19):6302–6309.
    1. Strijbos MH, Gratama JW, Schmitz PI, et al. Circulating endothelial cells, circulating tumour cells, tissue factor, endothelin-1 and overall survival in prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(11):2027–2035.
    1. Goodman OB, Jr, Symanowski JT, Loudyi A, Fink LM, Ward DC, Vogelzang NJ. Circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2011;9(1):31–38.
    1. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2106–2131.
    1. Roach M, Hanks G, Thames H, Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(4):965–974.
    1. Slovin SF, Wilton AS, Heller G, Scher HI. Time to detectable metastatic disease in patients with rising prostate specific antigen values following surgery or radiation therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(24):8669–8673.
    1. Scher HI, Heller G, Molina A, et al. Circulating tumor cell biomarker panel as an individual-level surrogate for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(12):1348–1355.
    1. Goldkorn A, Ely B, Quinn DI, et al. Circulating tumor cell counts are prognostic of overall survival in SWOG S0421: a phase III trial of docetaxel with or without atrasentan for metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1136–1142.
    1. Briganti A, Suardi N, Gallina A, et al. Predicting the risk of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(1):3–11.
    1. Francini E, Petrioli R, Rossi G, Laera L, Roviello G. PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of 22 trials. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(11):10601–10607.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner