Antenatal education and the birthing experience of Brazilian women: a qualitative study

Maria Amelia Miquelutti, José Guilherme Cecatti, Maria Yolanda Makuch, Maria Amelia Miquelutti, José Guilherme Cecatti, Maria Yolanda Makuch

Abstract

Background: Information is still scarce on the birthing experience of women who participate in antenatal systematic education programs. The objective of the study was to report the experience of labor as described by nulliparous women who participated and who did not in a systematic Birth Preparation Program (BPP).

Method: A qualitative study was conducted with eleven women who participated in a BPP and ten women attending routine prenatal care selected through purposeful sampling. The BPP consisted of systematized antenatal group meetings structured to provide physical exercise and information on pain prevention during pregnancy, the role of the pelvic floor muscles, the physiology of labor, and pain relief techniques. A single, semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analyses performed. The relevant themes were organized in the following categories of analysis: control of labor, positions adopted during labor, and satisfaction with labor.

Results: Women who participated in the systematic educational activities of the BPP reported they maintained self-control during labor and used breathing exercises, exercises on the ball, massage, baths and vertical positions to control pain. Also they reported satisfaction with their birthing experience. Women who did not participate in systematic educational activities referred to difficulties in maintaining control during labor and almost half of them reported lack of control. Also they were more likely to report dissatisfaction with labor.

Conclusions: Women who participated in the BPP reported self-control during labor and used non-pharmacological techniques to control pain and facilitate labor and expressed satisfaction with the birthing experience.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01155804.

References

    1. Ho I, Holroyd E. Chinese women's perceptions of the effectiveness of antenatal education in the preparation for motherhood. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:74–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02148.x.
    1. Spiby H, Henderson B, Slade P, Escott D, Fraser RB. Strategies for coping with labour: does antenatal education translate into practice? J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:388–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00900.x.
    1. Stamler LL. The participant’s views of childbirth education: is there congruency with an enablement framework for patient education? J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:939–47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00812.x.
    1. Escott D, Slade P, Spiby H, Fraser RB. Preliminary evaluation of a coping strategy enhancement method of preparation for labor. Midwifery. 2005;21:278–91. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.009.
    1. Nolan ML. Information giving and education in pregnancy: a review of qualitative studies. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18:21–30. doi: 10.1624/105812409X474681.
    1. McCrea H, Wright ME, Stringer M. Psychosocial factors influencing personal control in pain relief. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000;37:493–503. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00029-8.
    1. Perla L. Patient compliance and satisfaction with nursing care during delivery and recovery. J Nurs Care Qual. 2002;16:60–6.
    1. Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Johnston C, Hatem M. Predictors of women's perceptions of the childbirth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:24–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00203.x.
    1. McCrea BH. Satisfaction in childbirth and perceptions of personal control in pain relief during labour. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:877–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00961.x.
    1. Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med. 2008;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-7.
    1. Bergström M, Kieler H, Waldenström U. Psychoprophylaxis during labor: associations with labor-related outcomes and experience of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:794–800. doi: 10.3109/00016341003694978.
    1. Kimber L, McNabb M, Mc Court C, Haines A, Brocklehurst P. Massage or music for pain relief in labour: a pilot randomised placebo controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:961–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.004.
    1. Gau M-L, Chang CY, Tian SH, Lin KC. Effects of birth ball exercise on pain and self-efficacy during childbirth: a randomised controlled trial in Taiwan. Midwifery. 2011;27:e293–e300. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.004.
    1. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. California: Thousand Oaks; 2002. Qualitative Designs and Data Collection; pp. 143–98.
    1. Turato ER. Tratado da metodologia da pesquisa clínico-qualitativa: construção teórico-epistemológica, discussão comparada e aplicação nas áreas da saúde e humanas. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes; 2003.
    1. Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:212–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x.
    1. Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Rådestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth. 2004;31:17–27. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x.
    1. Hardin AM, Buckner EB. Characteristics of a positive experience for women who have unmedicated childbirth. J Perinat Educ. 2004;13:10–6.
    1. Cheung W, Ip WY, Chan D. Maternal anxiety and feelings of control during labour: a study of Chinese first-time pregnant women. Midwifery. 2007;23:123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.05.001.
    1. Miquelutti MA, Cecatti JG, Makuch MY. Upright position during the first stage of labor: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:553–8. doi: 10.1080/00016340601185251.
    1. Victora CG, Aquino EML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwaldet CL. Saúde de mães e crianças no Brasil: progressos e desafios. Lancet. 2011;377:2042–53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60055-X.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner