Combating information chaos: a case for collaborative clinical guidelines in a pandemic

C Lee Cohen, Katherine H Walker, Mina Hsiang, Paul D Sonenthal, Elisabeth D Riviello, Shada A Rouhani, Michael S Lipnick, Louis T Merriam, Edy Y Kim, C Lee Cohen, Katherine H Walker, Mina Hsiang, Paul D Sonenthal, Elisabeth D Riviello, Shada A Rouhani, Michael S Lipnick, Louis T Merriam, Edy Y Kim

Abstract

The speed and scale of new information during the COVID-19 pandemic required a new approach toward developing best practices and evidence-based clinical guidance. To address this need, we produced COVIDProtocols.org, a collaborative, evidence-based, digital platform for the development and dissemination of COVID-19 clinical guidelines that has been used by over 500,000 people from 196 countries. We use a Collaborative Writing Application (CWA) to facilitate an expedited expert review process and a web platform that deploys content directly from the CWA to minimize any delays. Over 200 contributors have volunteered to create open creative-commons content that spans over 30 specialties and medical disciplines. Multiple local and national governments, hospitals, and clinics have used the site as a key resource for their own clinical guideline development. COVIDprotocols.org represents a model for efficiently launching open-access clinical guidelines during crisis situations to share expertise and combat misinformation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04389671.

Conflict of interest statement

Covidprotocols.org has been financially supported by USAID, USAID’s Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) project, and the John Doerr Family Foundation. The remaining authors have no disclosures or conflicts of interest relevant to this work. E.Y.K. is a co-investigator in NCT04389671 (Windtree Therapeutics) testing lucinactant (surfactant-like treatment) in COVID-19 patients. E.Y.K. has received unrelated research funding from Bayer, the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, and the American Thoracic Society.

© 2021 The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COVIDprotocols.org models a continuously updated collaborative clinical guideline process (A) Collaborative guidelines process; CWA, collaborative writing application (i.e., Google Docs). (B) COVIDprotocols.org homepage and key features.

References

    1. Gianola S., Jesus T.S., Bargeri S., Castellini G. Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240123.
    1. Kang M., Gurbani S.S., Kempker J.A. The Published Scientific Literature on COVID-19: An Analysis of PubMed Abstracts. J. Med. Syst. 2020;45:3.
    1. Fraser N., Brierley L., Dey G., Polka J.K., Pálfy M., Coates J.A. Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.22.111294.
    1. Horbach S.P.J.M. Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020;1:1056–1067.
    1. Sachs J.D., Horton R., Bagenal J., Ben Amor Y., Karadag Caman O., Lafortune G. The Lancet COVID-19 Commission. Lancet. 2020;396:454–455.
    1. Kouzy R., Abi Jaoude J., Kraitem A., El Alam M.B., Karam B., Adib E., Zarka J., Traboulsi C., Akl E.W., Baddour K. Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter. Cureus. 2020;12:e7255.
    1. Galvão J. COVID-19: the deadly threat of misinformation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:e114.
    1. Tangcharoensathien V., Calleja N., Nguyen T., Purnat T., D’Agostino M., Garcia-Saiso S., Landry M., Rashidian A., Hamilton C., AbdAllah A. Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020;22:e19659.
    1. McMillan S.S., King M., Tully M.P. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2016;38:655–662.
    1. Archambault P.M., van de Belt T.H., Grajales F.J., 3rd, Faber M.J., Kuziemsky C.E., Gagnon S., Bilodeau A., Rioux S., Nelen W.L., Gagnon M.P. Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013;15:e210.
    1. Brulet A., Llorca G., Letrilliart L. Medical wikis dedicated to clinical practice: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015;17:e48.
    1. Archambault P.M., van de Belt T.H., Kuziemsky C., Plaisance A., Dupuis A., McGinn C.A., Francois R., Gagnon M.P., Turgeon A.F., Horsley T. Collaborative writing applications in healthcare: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017;5:CD011388.
    1. Wiles L.K., Hooper T.D., Hibbert P.D., Molloy C., White L., Jaffe A., Cowell C.T., Harris M.F., Runciman W.B., Schmiede A. Clinical indicators for common paediatric conditions: Processes, provenance and products of the CareTrack Kids study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0209637.
    1. Neuhaus S.J., Thomas D., Desai J., Vuletich C., von Dincklage J., Olver I. Wiki-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult onset sarcoma: a new paradigm in sarcoma evidence. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:614179.
    1. Damaske J., Walsh W., McKay J. CME in the Time of COVID-19: Educating Healthcare Professionals at the Point-of-care and Improving Performance Outcomes. J Eur CME. 2020;9:1832798.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner