A randomised comparison of the effect of haemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS in addition to standard care on quality of life and hospitalisations in patients with chronic heart failure : Design and rationale of the MONITOR HF multicentre randomised clinical trial

J J Brugts, J F Veenis, S P Radhoe, G C M Linssen, M van Gent, C J W Borleffs, J van Ramshorst, P van Pol, R Tukkie, R F Spee, M E Emans, W Kok, V van Halm, L Handoko, S L M A Beeres, M C Post, E Boersma, M J Lenzen, O C Manintveld, H Koffijberg, P van Baal, M Versteegh, T D Smilde, L van Heerebeek, M Rienstra, A Mosterd, P P H Delnoy, F W Asselbergs, H P Brunner-La Rocca, R A de Boer, J J Brugts, J F Veenis, S P Radhoe, G C M Linssen, M van Gent, C J W Borleffs, J van Ramshorst, P van Pol, R Tukkie, R F Spee, M E Emans, W Kok, V van Halm, L Handoko, S L M A Beeres, M C Post, E Boersma, M J Lenzen, O C Manintveld, H Koffijberg, P van Baal, M Versteegh, T D Smilde, L van Heerebeek, M Rienstra, A Mosterd, P P H Delnoy, F W Asselbergs, H P Brunner-La Rocca, R A de Boer

Abstract

Background: Assessing haemodynamic congestion based on filling pressures instead of clinical congestion can be a way to further improve quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcome by intervening before symptoms or weight gain occur in heart failure (HF) patients. The clinical efficacy of remote monitoring of pulmonary artery (PA) pressures (CardioMEMS; Abbott Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA) has been demonstrated in the USA. Currently, the PA sensor is not reimbursed in the European Union as its benefit when applied in addition to standard HF care is unknown in Western European countries, including the Netherlands.

Aims: To demonstrate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of haemodynamic PA monitoring in addition to contemporary standard HF care in a high-quality Western European health care system.

Methods: The current study is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised clinical trial in 340 patients with chronic HF (New York Heart Association functional class III) randomised to HF care including remote monitoring with the CardioMEMS PA sensor or standard HF care alone. Eligible patients have at least one hospitalisation for HF in 12 months before enrolment and will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Minimum follow-up will be 1 year. The primary endpoint is the change in QoL as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Secondary endpoints are the number of HF hospital admissions and changes in health status assessed by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire including health care utilisation and formal cost-effectiveness analysis.

Conclusion: The MONITOR HF trial will evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of haemodynamic monitoring by CardioMEMS in addition to standard HF care in patients with chronic HF. Clinical Trial Registration number NTR7672.

Keywords: CardioMEMS; Heart failure; Telemonitoring; Therapy; Trial; e‑Health.

Conflict of interest statement

J.J. Brugts has received speaker fees from Abbott and Vifor. M. Versteegh is a member of the EuroQoL research foundation. W. Kok: has received speaker fees from Novartis and Roche. S.L.M.A. Beeres is a medical advisor at the National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland). L. Handoko has received an educational grant from Novartis (<5kE), as well as speaker’s fees from Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheimand Vifor Pharma. F.W. Asselbergs is supported by UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The UMCG, which employs R.A. de Boer, has received research grants and/or fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Roche. R.A. de Boer is a minority shareholder of scPharmaceuticals and has received personal fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, MandalMed Inc. and Novartis. J.F. Veenis, S.P. Radhoe, G.C.M. Linssen; M. van Gent, C.J.W. Borleffs, J. van Ramshorst, P. van Pol, R. Tukkie, R.F. Spee, M.E. Emans, V. van Halm, M.C. Post, E. Boersma, M.J. Lenzen, O.C. Manintveld, H. Koffijberg, P. van Baal, T.D. Smilde, L. van Heerebeek, M. Rienstra, A. Mosterd, P.P.H. Delnoy and H.P. Brunner-La Rocca declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participating centres in the Netherlands
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a The CardioMEMS sensor (with permission of Abbott Inc.). b The CardioMEMS HF system patient unit including antenna (with permission of Abbott Inc.). c Location of the CardioMEMS sensor in the left pulmonary artery (with permission of Abbott Inc.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The MONITOR HF trial follow-up scheme. Randomisation at baseline visit

References

    1. De Boer AR, Rutten FH, Valk MJM, Brugts JJ, Deckers JW, Bots ML, Vaartjes I. Nederlandse Hartstichting 2018. Cijfers over risicofactoren, hartinterventies, ziekte en sterfte. Hartfalen in Nederland. 2018.
    1. RIVM . RIVM rapport hartfalen 2012: epidemiologie, risicofactoren en toekomst. 2012.
    1. Brugts JJ, Linssen GCM, Hoes AW, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Investigators of CHECK-HF. Real-world heart failure management in 10,910 patients with chronic heart failure in the Netherlands: design and rationale of the chronic heart failure ESC guideline-based cardiology practice quality project (CHECK-HF) registry. Neth Heart J. 2018;26:272–279. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1103-7.
    1. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Linssen GC, the CHECK-HF investigators et al. Contemporary drug treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The CHECK-HF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;7:13–21.
    1. Greene SJ, Butler J, Albert NM, et al. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CHAMP-HF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:351–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070.
    1. Angermann CE, Stork S, Gelbrich G, et al. Mode of action and effects of standardized collaborative disease management on mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic heart failure: the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure (INH) study. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:25–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962969.
    1. Koehler F, Winkler S, Schieber M, et al. Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM-HF), a randomized, controlled intervention trial investigating the impact of telemedicine on mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: study design. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:1354–1362. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq199.
    1. Lynga P, Persson H, Hagg-Martinell A, et al. Weight monitoring in patients with severe heart failure (WISH). A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:438–444. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs023.
    1. Cleland JG, Louis AA, Rigby AS, et al. Noninvasive home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure at high risk of recurrent admission and death: Trans-European Network-Home-Care Management System (TEN-HMS) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1654–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.050.
    1. Pfisterer M, Buser P, Rickli H, et al. BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy: the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients with Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301:383–392. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2.
    1. Koehler F, Koehler K, Deckwart O, et al. Efficacy of telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure (TIM-HF2): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, unmasked trial. Lancet. 2018;392:1047–1057. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31880-4.
    1. Brachmann J, Bohm M, Rybak K, et al. Fluid status monitoring with a wireless network to reduce cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure: rationale and design of the OptiLink HF Study (Optimization of Heart Failure Management using OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring and CareLink) Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:796–804. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr045.
    1. van Veldhuisen DJ, Braunschweig F, Conraads V, et al. Intrathoracic impedance monitoring, audible patient alerts, and outcome in patients with HF. Circulation. 2011;124:1719–1726. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043042.
    1. Hindricks G, Taborsky M, Glikson M, et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384:583–590. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61176-4.
    1. Bohm M, Drexler H, Oswald H, et al. Fluid status telemedicine alerts for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:3154–3163. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw099.
    1. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:658–666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60101-3.
    1. Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Bourge RC, et al. Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387:453–461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00723-0.
    1. Heywood JT, Jermyn R, Shavelle D, et al. Impact of practice-based management of pulmonary artery pressures in 2000 patients implanted with the CardioMEMS sensor. Circulation. 2017;135:1509–1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026184.
    1. Desai AS, Bhimaraj A, Bharmi R, et al. Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring reduces heart failure hospitalizations in “real-world” clinical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2357–2365. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.009.
    1. Shavelle D, Desai AS, Abraham WT, et al. Pulmonary artery pressure-guided therapy for ambulatory heart failure patients in clinical practice:1-year outcomes from the CardioMEMS post-approval study. Abstract. Am Coll Cardiol Meet. 2019.
    1. Sandhu AT, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Owens DK, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.12.015.
    1. Cowie MR, Simon M, Klein L, Thokala P. The cost-effectiveness of real-time pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure patients: a European perspective. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:661–669. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.747.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GM, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:891–975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592.
    1. Spertus J, Peterson E, Conard MW, Heidenreich PA, Krumholz HM, Jones P, McCullough PA, Pina I, Tooley J, Weintraub WS, Rumsfeld JS. Cardiovascular outcomes research consortium. Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. Am Heart J. 2005;150:707–715. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010.
    1. Walters S, Brazier J, et al. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2005;101:104–108.
    1. Bouwmans C, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Koopmanschap M, Krol M, Severens H, Brouwer W. Handleiding iMTA medical cost questionnaire (iMCQ) Rotterdam: iMTA, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; 2013.
    1. Rogers JG, et al. Palliative care in heart failure: the PAL-HF randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.030.
    1. Kanters TA, Bouwmans CA, van der Linden N, Tan SS, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. Update of the Dutch manual for costing studies in health care. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0187477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187477.
    1. Jaarsma T, van der Wal M, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with HF Coordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in HF (COACH) Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:316–324. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.83.
    1. van Baal PH, Wong A, Slobbe LC, Polder JJ, Brouwer WB, de Wit GA. Standardizing the inclusion of indirect medical costs in economic evaluations. PharmacoEconomics. 2011;29(3):175–187. doi: 10.2165/11586130-000000000-00000.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner