A drug-eluting Balloon for the trEatment of coronarY bifurcatiON lesions in the side branch: a prospective multicenter ranDomized (BEYOND) clinical trial in China

Quan-Min Jing, Xin Zhao, Ya-Ling Han, Ling-Ling Gao, Yang Zheng, Zhan-Quan Li, Ping Yang, Hong-Liang Cong, Chuan-Yu Gao, Tie-Min Jiang, Hui Li, Jun-Xia Li, Dong-Mei Wang, Geng Wang, Zhan-Chun Cong, Zhong Zhang, Quan-Min Jing, Xin Zhao, Ya-Ling Han, Ling-Ling Gao, Yang Zheng, Zhan-Quan Li, Ping Yang, Hong-Liang Cong, Chuan-Yu Gao, Tie-Min Jiang, Hui Li, Jun-Xia Li, Dong-Mei Wang, Geng Wang, Zhan-Chun Cong, Zhong Zhang

Abstract

Background: Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging; a simple strategy has been preferred as of late, but the disadvantage is ostium stenosis or even occlusion of the side branch (SB). Only a few single-center studies investigating the combination of a drug-eluting stent in the main branch followed by a drug-eluting balloon in the SB have been reported. This prospective, multicenter, randomized study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) compared with regular balloon angioplasty (BA) in the treatment of non-left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.

Methods: Between December 2014 and November 2015, a total of 222 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions were enrolled in this study at ten Chinese centers. Patients were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to a PEB group (n = 113) and a BA group (n = 109). The primary efficacy endpoint was angiographic target lesion stenosis at 9 months. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints included target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, target lesion failure, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs), all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and thrombosis in target lesions. The main analyses performed in this clinical trial included case shedding analysis, base-value equilibrium analysis, effectiveness analysis, and safety analysis. SAS version 9.4 was used for the statistical analyses.

Results: At the 9-month angiographic follow-up, the difference in the primary efficacy endpoint of target lesion stenosis between the PEB (28.7% ± 18.7%) and BA groups (40.0% ± 19.0%) was -11.3% (95% confidence interval: -16.3% to -6.3%, Psuperiority <0.0001) in the intention-to-treat analysis, and similar results were recorded in the per-protocol analysis, demonstrating the superiority of PEB to BA. Late lumen loss was significantly lower in the PEB group than in the BA group (-0.06 ± 0.32 vs. 0.18 ± 0.34 mm, P < 0.0001). For intention-to-treat, there were no significant differences between PEB and BA in the 9-month percentages of MACCEs (0.9% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.16) or non-fatal myocardial infarctions (0 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.49). There were no clinical events of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, target lesion failure, all-cause death, cardiac death or target lesion thrombosis in either group.

Conclusions: In de novo non-left main coronary artery bifurcations treated with provisional T stenting, SB dilation with the PEB group demonstrated better angiographic results than treatment with regular BA at the 9-month follow-up in terms of reduced target lesion stenosis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325817; https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. Follow-up window: 30 days: ±7 days, 6 months: ±30 days; 9 months: ±30 days.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary endpoint of target lesion stenosis at 9 months. ∗Covariance analysis model included the factors of group, center, and pre-procedure diameter of the stenosis of target lesion. Four centers that had a small number of patients were consolidated as one center for analysis. BA: Balloon angioplasty; CI: Confidence interval; PEB: Paclitaxel-eluting balloon.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative frequency distribution of MLD determined by quantitative coronary angiography. PEB vs. BA: Pre-procedure (pre), post-procedure (post), and at 9 months (follow-up). BA: Balloon angioplasty; MLD: Minimal lumen diameters; PEB: Paclitaxel-eluting balloon.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A patient treated with the PEB for a bifurcation lesion. (A) High-grade stenosis in the proximal first diagonal branch. (B) Final result after angioplasty and PEB. (C) Angiographic control after 9 months without any signs of restenosis. PCI: Percutaneous coronary interventions; PEB: Paclitaxel-eluting balloon.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time-to-event curves for the composite endpoints of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events through 9 months in the intention-to-treat population. The event rates presented here were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared with the log-rank test. BA: Balloon angioplasty; PEB: Paclitaxel-eluting balloon.

References

    1. Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, Lefèvre T, Chieffo A, Hildick-Smith D, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. EuroIntervention 2014; 10:545–560. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A97.
    1. Banning AP, Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Lefèvre T, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2019; 15:90–98. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00144.
    1. Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q, et al. Clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter DKCRUSH-II study (randomized study on double kissing crush technique versus provisional stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:e004497.doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.
    1. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (coronary bifurcations: application of the crushing technique using sirolimus-eluting stents) study. Circulation 2009; 119:71–78. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402.
    1. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR, Jr, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004; 109:1244–1249. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118474.71662.E3.
    1. Ferenc M, Ayoub M, Büttner HJ, Gick M, Comberg T, Rothe J, et al. Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study. EuroIntervention 2015; 11:856–859. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I8A175.
    1. Bai J, Yue Y, Feng HQ, Hao SX, Peng L, Zhang M, et al. Impact of main vessel calcification on procedural and clinical outcomes of bifurcation lesion undergoing provisional single-stenting intervention: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019; 16:156–163. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.02.012.
    1. Katritsis DG, Siontis GC, Ioannidis JP. Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2:409–415. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.868091.
    1. Zhang F, Dong L, Ge J. Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart 2009; 95:1676–1681. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.168641.
    1. Lv YH, Guo C, Li M, Zhang MB, Wang ZL. Modified double-stent strategy may be an optimal choice for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13377.doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013377.
    1. Hakeem A, Khan FM, Bhatti S, Samad Z, Effat MA, Eckman MH, et al. Provisional vs. complex stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21:589–595. doi: 10.1590/S0373-55241966000100005.
    1. Speck U, Stolzenburg N, Peters D, Scheller B. How does a drug-coated balloon work? Overview about coating technologies and their impact. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2016; 57:3–11. doi: 10.2514/1.A32956.
    1. Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Böhm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation 2004; 110:810–814. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0.
    1. Gershlick AH. Treating atherosclerosis: local drug delivery from laboratory studies to clinical trials. Atherosclerosis 2002; 160:259–271. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(01)00618-9.
    1. Moses JW, Kipshidze N, Leon MB. Perspectives of drug-eluting stents: the next revolution. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2002; 2:163–172. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200202030-00004.
    1. Wolinsky H, Lin CS. Use of the perforated balloon catheter to infuse marker substances into diseased coronary artery walls after experimental postmortem angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:174B–178B. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90955-9.
    1. Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, et al. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2113–2124. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254.
    1. Sarode K, Spelber DA, Bhatt DL, Mohammad A, Prasad A, Brilakis ES, et al. Drug delivering technology for endovascular management of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:827–839. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.008.
    1. Cortese B, di Palma G, Latini RA, Elwany M, Orrego PS, Seregni RG. Immediate and short-term performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon during complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The FAtebenefratelli SIrolimus COated-balloon (FASICO) registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017; 18:487–491. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.03.025.
    1. Chen YC, Lin FY, Cheng SM, Chang CC, Chuang CL, Lin RH, et al. Wide-angle coronary bifurcation stenotic lesions treated with one drug-eluting stent and sequential balloon technique: a better strategy? Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29:437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.02.189.
    1. Mathey DG, Wendig I, Boxberger M, Bonaventura K, Kleber FX. Treatment of bifurcation lesions with a drug-eluting balloon: the PEPCAD V (paclitaxel eluting PTCA balloon in coronary artery disease) trial. EuroIntervention 2011; 7: Suppl K: K61–K65. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7SKA11.
    1. Stella PR, Belkacemi A, Dubois C, Nathoe H, Dens J, Naber C, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in bifurcation lesions treated with a single-stenting technique: six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical results of the drug-eluting balloon in bifurcations trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80:1138–1146. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23499.
    1. López Mínguez JR, Nogales Asensio JM, Doncel Vecino LJ, Sandoval J, Romany S, Martínez Romero P, et al. A prospective randomised study of the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in bifurcated coronary lesions (BABILON trial): 24-month clinical and angiographic results. EuroIntervention 2014; 10:50–57. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I1A10.
    1. Herrador JA, Fernandez JC, Guzman M, Aragon V. Drug-eluting vs. conventional balloon for side branch dilation in coronary bifurcations treated by provisional T stenting. J Interv Cardiol 2013; 26:454–462. doi: 10.1111/joic.12061.
    1. Berland J, Lefèvre T, Brenot P, Fajadet J, Motreff P, Guerin P, et al. DANUBIO - a new drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of side branches in bifurcation lesions: six-month angiographic follow-up results of the DEBSIDE trial. EuroIntervention 2015; 11:868–876. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I8A177.
    1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007; 115:2344–2351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
    1. Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Capodanno D, Barrano G, Ussia GP, Tamburino C. Mini-crush versus T-provisional techniques in bifurcation lesions: clinical and angiographic long-term outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.005.
    1. Xu B, Qian J, Ge J, Wang J, Chen F, Chen J, et al. Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 1:624–629. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26401.
    1. Kleber FX, Mathey DG, Rittger H, Scheller B. German Drug-eluting Balloon Consensus Group. How to use the drug-eluting balloon: recommendations by the German consensus group. EuroIntervention 2011; 7: Suppl K: K125–K128. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7SKA21.
    1. Kleber FX, Rittger H, Bonaventura K, Zeymer U, Wöhrle J, Jeger R, et al. Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group. Clin Res Cardiol 2013; 102:785–797. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0609-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner