Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)

Mauricio F Villamar, Magdalena Sarah Volz, Marom Bikson, Abhishek Datta, Alexandre F Dasilva, Felipe Fregni, Mauricio F Villamar, Magdalena Sarah Volz, Marom Bikson, Abhishek Datta, Alexandre F Dasilva, Felipe Fregni

Abstract

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) has recently been developed as a noninvasive brain stimulation approach that increases the accuracy of current delivery to the brain by using arrays of smaller "high-definition" electrodes, instead of the larger pad-electrodes of conventional tDCS. Targeting is achieved by energizing electrodes placed in predetermined configurations. One of these is the 4x1-ring configuration. In this approach, a center ring electrode (anode or cathode) overlying the target cortical region is surrounded by four return electrodes, which help circumscribe the area of stimulation. Delivery of 4x1-ring HD-tDCS is capable of inducing significant neurophysiological and clinical effects in both healthy subjects and patients. Furthermore, its tolerability is supported by studies using intensities as high as 2.0 milliamperes for up to twenty minutes. Even though 4x1 HD-tDCS is simple to perform, correct electrode positioning is important in order to accurately stimulate target cortical regions and exert its neuromodulatory effects. The use of electrodes and hardware that have specifically been tested for HD-tDCS is critical for safety and tolerability. Given that most published studies on 4x1 HD-tDCS have targeted the primary motor cortex (M1), particularly for pain-related outcomes, the purpose of this article is to systematically describe its use for M1 stimulation, as well as the considerations to be taken for safe and effective stimulation. However, the methods outlined here can be adapted for other HD-tDCS configurations and cortical targets.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/3735368/bin/jove-77-50309-thumb.jpg

References

    1. Villamar MF, Santos Portilla A, Fregni F, Zafonte R. Noninvasive brain stimulation to modulate neuroplasticity in traumatic brain injury. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:326–338.
    1. Dos Santos MF, et al. Immediate effects of tDCS on the μ-opioid system of a chronic pain patient. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:1–6.
    1. Nitsche MA, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art. Brain Stimul. 2008;11:642–651.
    1. Datta A, et al. Gyri -precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009;2:201–207.
    1. Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2010;121:2165–2171.
    1. Nitsche MA, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2007;97:3109–3117.
    1. Dasilva AF, et al. tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine. Headache. 2012;52:1283–1295.
    1. Antal A, et al. Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain. Neuroimage. 2012.
    1. Minhas P, et al. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2010;190:188–197.
    1. Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y, Parra LC. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J. Neural Eng. 2011;8:046011.
    1. Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P, Parra LC, Bikson M. Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:91.
    1. Edwards DJ, et al. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage. 2013. Under review.
    1. Caparelli-Daquer EM, et al., editors. A pilot study on effects of 4x1 High-Definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability. 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2012. pp. 735–738.
    1. Kuo HI, et al. Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 x 1 ring tDCS: A neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul. 2012.
    1. Borckardt JJ, et al. A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. J. Pain. 2012;13:112–120.
    1. Villamar MF, et al. Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4x1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. J. Pain. 2013;14:371–383.
    1. Datta A, Bikson M, Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow. Neuroimage. 2010;52:1268–1278.
    1. Reilly EL. Ch. 7. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva FH, editors. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. pp. 139–141.
    1. DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Vis. Exp. 2011. p. e2744.
    1. Datta A, Elwassif M, Bikson M, editors. Bio-heat transfer model of transcranial DC stimulation: comparison of conventional pad versus ring electrode. Conference proceedings. 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2009. pp. 670–673.
    1. Merrill DR, Bikson M, Jefferys JG. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2005;141:171–198.
    1. Hahn C, et al. Methods for extra-low voltage transcranial direct current stimulation: Current and time dependent impedance decreases. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012.
    1. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006;117:845–850.
    1. Brunoni AR, et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14:1133–1145.
    1. Palm U, Keeser D, Schiller C, Fintescu Z, Nitsche M, Reisinger , Padberg E. Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Brain Stimul. 2008;1:386–387.
    1. Datta A, Baker JM, Bikson M, Fridriksson J. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul. 2011;4:169–174.
    1. Antal A TD, Poreisz C, Paulus W. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;26:2687–2691.
    1. Datta A, Elwassif M, Battaglia F, Bikson M. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis. J. Neural Eng. 2008;5:163–174.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner