Randomized Phase II Study of Two Doses of Pixantrone in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (NCCTG N1031, Alliance)

Kostandinos Sideras, David W Hillman, Karthik Giridhar, Brenda F Ginos, Richard C Tenglin, Heshan Liu, Beiyun Chen, Winston Tan, Gerald G Gross, Rex B Mowat, Amylou C Dueck, Edith A Perez, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Kostandinos Sideras, David W Hillman, Karthik Giridhar, Brenda F Ginos, Richard C Tenglin, Heshan Liu, Beiyun Chen, Winston Tan, Gerald G Gross, Rex B Mowat, Amylou C Dueck, Edith A Perez, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia

Abstract

Background: Anthracycline use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is hindered by cumulative exposure limits and risk of cardiotoxicity. Pixantrone, a novel aza-anthracenedione with structural similarities to mitoxantrone and anthracyclines, is theorized to exhibit less cardiotoxicity, mainly due to lack of iron binding. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing schedules of pixantrone in patients with refractory HER2-negative MBC.

Methods: Intravenous pixantrone was administered at 180 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (group A) versus 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (group B). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), median 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, quality of life, and serial assessment of circulating tumor cells. A 20% ORR was targeted as sufficient for further testing of pixantrone in this patient population.

Results: Forty-five patients were evaluable, with 2 confirmed partial responses in group A and 1 in group B. The trial was terminated due to insufficient activity. Overall median PFS and OS were 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.1) and 16.8 (95% CI: 8.9-21.6) months, respectively. Notable overall grade 3-4 adverse events were the following: neutrophil count decrease (62%), fatigue (16%), and decrease in ejection fraction (EF) (4%).

Conclusion: Pixantrone has insufficient activity in the second- and third-line MBC setting. It appears, however, to have limited cardiotoxicity. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01086605).

Keywords: anthracycline; breast cancer; cardiotoxicity; pixantrone; randomized phase II.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free and overall survival by dosing schedule. Group A received pixantrone at 180 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and group B received pixantrone 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 4-week cycles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change in ejection fraction at the end of treatment as compared to baseline.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival by CTC cut-off (negative <5 CTCs, positive ≥5 CTCs). (B) Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival (OS) and overall survival by CTC cut-off (negative <5 CTCs, positive ≥5 CTCs).

References

    1. Smith LA, Cornelius VR, Plummer CJ, et al. . Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:337.
    1. Ryberg M, Nielsen D, Cortese G, Nielsen G, Skovsgaard T, Andersen PK.. New insight into epirubicin cardiac toxicity: competing risks analysis of 1097 breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(15):1058-1067.
    1. Salvatorelli E, Menna P, Paz OG, et al. . The novel anthracenedione, pixantrone, lacks redox activity and inhibits doxorubicinol formation in human myocardium: insight to explain the cardiac safety of pixantrone in doxorubicin-treated patients. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;344(2):467-478.
    1. Cavalletti E, Crippa L, Mainardi P, et al. . Pixantrone (BBR 2778) has reduced cardiotoxic potential in mice pretreated with doxorubicin: comparative studies against doxorubicin and mitoxantrone. Invest New Drugs. 2007;25(3):187-195.
    1. Pettengell R, Coiffier B, Narayanan G, et al. . Pixantrone dimaleate versus other chemotherapeutic agents as a single-agent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(7):696-706.
    1. Péan E, Flores B, Hudson I, et al. . The European Medicines Agency review of pixantrone for the treatment of adult patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphomas: summary of the scientific assessment of the committee for medicinal products for human use. Oncologist. 2013;18(5):625-633.
    1. Buchanan DR, O’Mara AM, Kelaghan JW, Minasian LM.. Quality-of-life assessment in the symptom management trials of the National Cancer Institute-supported Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(3):591-598.
    1. Sloan JA, Aaronson N, Cappelleri JC, Fairclough DL, Varricchio C; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):479-487.
    1. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, et al. . Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4249-4255.
    1. Blum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM, et al. . Multicenter, phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2001;92(7):1759-1768.
    1. Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C, et al. . Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(4):536-542.
    1. Gasparini G, Caffo O, Barni S, et al. . Vinorelbine is an active antiproliferative agent in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(10):2094-2101.
    1. Perez EA, Lerzo G, Pivot X, et al. . Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a phase II study of patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(23):3407-3414.
    1. Reichardt P, Von Minckwitz G, Thuss-Patience PC, et al. . Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(“)) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(8):1227-1233.
    1. Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. . Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5210-5217.
    1. Menna P, Salvatorelli E, Minotti G.. Rethinking drugs from chemistry to therapeutic opportunities: pixantrone beyond anthracyclines. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;29(8):1270-1278.
    1. Hasinoff BB, Wu X, Patel D, Kanagasabai R, Karmahapatra S, Yalowich JC.. Mechanisms of action and reduced cardiotoxicity of pixantrone; a topoisomerase ii targeting agent with cellular selectivity for the topoisomerase IIα isoform. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016;356(2):397-409.
    1. Beggiolin G, Crippa L, Menta E, et al. . Bbr 2778, an AZA-anthracenedione endowed with preclinical anticancer activity and lack of delayed cardiotoxicity. Tumori. 2001;87(6):407-416.
    1. Ignatiadis M, Perraki M, Apostolaki S, et al. . Molecular detection and prognostic value of circulating cytokeratin-19 messenger RNA-positive and HER2 messenger RNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of women with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7(11):883-889.
    1. Reinholz MM, Nibbe A, Jonart LM, et al. . Evaluation of a panel of tumor markers for molecular detection of circulating cancer cells in women with suspected breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(10):3722-3732.
    1. Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, et al. . Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(8):781-791.
    1. Riethdorf S, Fritsche H, Müller V, et al. . Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a validation study of the CellSearch system. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(3):920-928.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner